05.12.2012 Views

To download as a PDF click here - US Army Center Of Military History

To download as a PDF click here - US Army Center Of Military History

To download as a PDF click here - US Army Center Of Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In T R o d u c T Io n : Th e so u R c e s o f we a p o n s In n o v a T Io n 9<br />

facilities, working in collaboration with industrial contractors, played major roles<br />

in the development of nuclear-powered propulsion systems for submarines and<br />

surface ships, the Sidewinder air-to-air missile, and Polaris, the first submarinelaunched<br />

nuclear missile.<br />

In 1923, the Navy established the Naval Research Laboratory in W<strong>as</strong>hington,<br />

D.C., to pursue a broader and more diversified R&D program independent of<br />

the immediate technical support functions handled by the bureaus. This type of<br />

institution w<strong>as</strong> unique to the Navy; its equivalent did not exist in the <strong>Army</strong> and<br />

the Air Force. The Navy did, however, establish a contracting unit—the <strong>Of</strong>fice<br />

of Naval Research (ONR)—in 1946 to fund academic and industrial research<br />

unrelated to specific weapons requirements. Moreover, ONR served <strong>as</strong> the<br />

model for the <strong>Army</strong> and the Air Force, both of which set up similar contracting<br />

organizations—the <strong>Army</strong> Research <strong>Of</strong>fice and the <strong>Of</strong>fice of Air Research—to<br />

support long-term research in private-sector institutions. The founding of ONR<br />

(and its counterparts in the <strong>Army</strong> and the Air Force) also signaled the beginning<br />

of a larger shift of Defense Department resources for R&D from the in-house<br />

service laboratories to outside contractors.<br />

Chapter 4 examines the growth and diversification of the Air Force’s inhouse<br />

R&D facilities after World War II. Because its primary technology<br />

of choice—the airplane—is a more recent innovation, the Air Force h<strong>as</strong> a<br />

history of research and development that lacks the long, deep institutional<br />

legacies found in the <strong>Army</strong> and the Navy. Originally an organizational<br />

element of the <strong>Army</strong>, the Air Force did not achieve status <strong>as</strong> an independent<br />

service until 1947. Prior to separation, research and development had been<br />

dispersed among a diverse group of public and private-sector institutions:<br />

the domestic aircraft manufacturers, the National Advisory Committee<br />

for Aeronautics, the National Bureau of Standards, and the air arm’s own<br />

in-house R&D facilities. Major internal R&D operations were located at<br />

Wright Field in Ohio. After the war, however, the scale of Air Force R&D<br />

grew rapidly to include new electronics and communications programs<br />

at Rome Air Development <strong>Center</strong> near Syracuse, New York, and the<br />

Cambridge Research Laboratories outside Boston. The Arnold Engineering<br />

Development <strong>Center</strong> in Tennessee handled testing and development of all<br />

types of aircraft engines and rocket motors, while the evaluation centers at<br />

Edwards (California), Kirtland (New Mexico), Holloman (New Mexico), and<br />

Patrick (Florida) Air Force b<strong>as</strong>es supported similar functions on complete<br />

aircraft and ballistic missile delivery systems. In addition to supporting these<br />

ongoing technical activities, the Air Force laboratories also diversified—both<br />

internally and through external contracts—into more speculative fields of<br />

science and technology, such <strong>as</strong> artificial intelligence and l<strong>as</strong>er and particlebeam<br />

weapons.<br />

Finally, it is necessary to include a brief note on the source materials and the<br />

research methodology used to produce this monograph. T<strong>here</strong> is no synthetic<br />

history of research and development in the Department of Defense or in the<br />

individual military services during the Cold War. The published secondary<br />

literature, most of which is cited in the chapters that follow, focuses on specific

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!