To download as a PDF click here - US Army Center Of Military History
To download as a PDF click here - US Army Center Of Military History
To download as a PDF click here - US Army Center Of Military History
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ReseaRch a n d developmenT In T h e na v y 65<br />
Although the merger resolved jurisdictional tensions over missile development,<br />
it created difficulties with regard to managerial organization and effectiveness.<br />
M<strong>as</strong>sive and unwieldy, the new bureau controlled 60 percent of the <strong>as</strong>sets of the<br />
Naval Material Support Establishment, itself founded in 1963 through a merger<br />
of the bureaus of Yards and Docks, Supplies and Accounts, and Ships. <strong>To</strong> avoid<br />
the likelihood of future jurisdictional conflicts arising from the development of<br />
new weapon systems, the Navy leadership reorganized the bureau structure in<br />
1965 into six separate functional commands administered by a new umbrella<br />
organization—the Naval Material Command (headed by the Chief of Naval<br />
Material). Each command w<strong>as</strong> b<strong>as</strong>ed on an integrated systems approach (for<br />
ships, air, ordnance, electronics, facilities engineering, and supply) that cut across<br />
the once-rigid institutional boundaries that had defined the old bureau system.<br />
The Navy reorganized the in-house laboratories in response to the formation<br />
of the Naval Material Command. In line with this transformation, the Navy<br />
established late in 1965 the dual position of Director of Naval Laboratories<br />
(reporting to the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research and Development)<br />
and Director of Laboratory Programs (reporting to the Chief of Naval Material)<br />
to coordinate the programs and functions of the laboratories managed by the<br />
new command structure. This realignment placed direct management of the<br />
laboratories and technical programs under the control of a civilian scientist, who<br />
no longer reported to the individual bureau chiefs. Like the bureaus, several of the<br />
in-house laboratories were reorganized into major centers along functional lines.<br />
In 1967, the Navy established the first center—the Naval Ship Research and<br />
Development <strong>Center</strong>—followed by the Naval Weapons <strong>Center</strong>, Naval Undersea<br />
Research and Development <strong>Center</strong>, Navy Electronics Laboratory <strong>Center</strong>, and<br />
the Naval Air Development <strong>Center</strong>. 85<br />
The transformation of the independent bureaus into centralized system<br />
commands illustrates the extent to which the introduction of new weapons<br />
technologies upset traditional roles and missions. The Special Projects <strong>Of</strong>fice,<br />
Lead Bureau Concept, and other ad hoc me<strong>as</strong>ures initially e<strong>as</strong>ed jurisdictional<br />
tensions between the bureaus, but naval leaders sought a better and more l<strong>as</strong>ting<br />
85 Booz Allen, Review of Navy R&D Management, 85–90. The Naval Ship Research and Development<br />
<strong>Center</strong> comprised the David Taylor Model B<strong>as</strong>in, Marine Engineering Laboratory, and the former Mine<br />
Defense Laboratory (Panama City, Florida). The Naval Ordnance Test Station at China Lake and the<br />
Naval Ordnance Laboratory (Corona) merged to form the Naval Weapons <strong>Center</strong>. The P<strong>as</strong>adena annex<br />
of the Naval Ordnance Test Station and the Undersea Technology Directorate of the Naval Electronics<br />
Laboratory combined to form the Naval Undersea Research and Development <strong>Center</strong> (San Diego). The<br />
Naval Air Development <strong>Center</strong> at Johnsville, Pennsylvania, acquired the Aerospace Crew Equipment<br />
Department, the Aeronautical Materials Department, and the Aeronautical Structures Department<br />
previously <strong>as</strong>signed to the Naval Air Engineering Station at Philadelphia. The Naval Electronics Laboratory<br />
<strong>Center</strong> (San Diego), Naval Weapons Laboratory (formerly the Naval Proving Ground at Dahlgren), and<br />
the Naval Ordnance Laboratory (White Oak) remained intact. In addition to the major weapons centers<br />
and laboratories, several smaller R&D facilities were either established outright or reorganized through<br />
mergers and divestitures: the Naval Underwater Weapons Research and Engineering Station (formerly<br />
the Naval <strong>To</strong>rpedo Station; Newport, Rhode Island); the Underwater Sound Laboratory (New London);<br />
Naval Applied Science Laboratory (Brooklyn); Naval Radiological Defense Laboratory (San Francisco);<br />
and the Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory (Port Huenene, California). “R&D <strong>Center</strong>s/Laboratories,”<br />
Armed Forces Journal 106 (17 May 1969): 30–31; “Navy Establishes R&D <strong>Center</strong>,” Journal of the Armed<br />
Forces 104 (8 April 1967): 2.