06.12.2012 Views

ILCD Handbook: Framework and requirements for LCIA models and ...

ILCD Handbook: Framework and requirements for LCIA models and ...

ILCD Handbook: Framework and requirements for LCIA models and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>ILCD</strong> <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong>: <strong>Framework</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>requirements</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>LCIA</strong> <strong>models</strong> <strong>and</strong> indicators First edition<br />

For the calculation of endpoint (damage) factors, it is recommended to use the WMO<br />

2003 scenario A1, which predicts that the Equivalent Effective Stratospheric Chlorine (EESC)<br />

concentration will drop in 2044 to below a threshold value (EESC0), when UV damage to<br />

Human Health will equal the natural background. Any ODS emitted after 2040 can be<br />

considered as not contributing to any additional damage.<br />

4.2.1.1 Environmental Mechanism (cause-effect chain)<br />

The picture below illustrates the cause-effect chain used by most <strong>models</strong>. It is similar to<br />

that of the climate model. The link to cataract is becoming more disputed (de Gruijl 2002 <strong>and</strong><br />

Sasaki 1999) <strong>and</strong> the link to immune suppression has not been implemented. NB: this link is<br />

not completely clear.<br />

Wood<br />

production<br />

Effects on ecosystems<br />

<strong>and</strong> productivity<br />

Crop<br />

production<br />

Emissions into the atmosphere<br />

Time integrated concentration of Halons<br />

Decreased ozone concentration<br />

Fish<br />

production<br />

Increased UV-B level<br />

Immune<br />

suppression<br />

Effects on<br />

humans<br />

Midpoint (WMO)<br />

Skin<br />

cancer<br />

Cataract<br />

Figure 4-2 Causality chain of the model to assess impacts of ODS. The link to ecosystems is<br />

generally not modelled in terms of biodiversity losses.<br />

4.2.2 Criteria <strong>for</strong> Evaluation of this impact category<br />

Next to the general criteria described in Chapter 2, the main criteria ‗Environmental<br />

relevance‘ <strong>and</strong> ‗Scientific robustness‘ have been specified by the following sub criteria:<br />

Atmospheric fate <strong>and</strong> transport is considered.<br />

For damages on ecosystems, all relevant effects are considered.<br />

For damages on Human Health, all relevant effects are considered.<br />

All category indicators <strong>and</strong> characterisation <strong>models</strong> linking midpoint to damage fulfil the<br />

science-based <strong>requirements</strong>.<br />

The coverage of the impacts in the modelling from midpoint to endpoint is complete.<br />

The fate <strong>and</strong> transport model reflects the latest state of knowledge.<br />

The human damage model is scientifically robust.<br />

The ecosystem damage model with loss of species is scientifically robust.<br />

4 Requirements <strong>for</strong> specific impact categories 34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!