01.10.2015 Views

CONSERVATIVE

eurocon_12_2015_summer-fall

eurocon_12_2015_summer-fall

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

John was widely believed to be behind the sudden<br />

disappearance of his twelve-year old nephew and<br />

pretender to the throne, Arthur of Brittany. His second<br />

marriage to Isabelle d’Angoulême set in motion various<br />

events which would lead to John’s loss of territories in<br />

France and Normandy. He then developed plans for a<br />

re-conquest of these territories and taxed his subjects<br />

heavily in order to finance such a venture. However,<br />

these military campaigns ended in defeat. And soon his<br />

many misdemeanours became widely known.<br />

Vincent chronicles a number of these misdeeds:<br />

taking his sons and nephews as hostages, offering a<br />

bounty for the murder of Welsh outlaws, his numerous<br />

mistresses, his love for beer, and his perceived Christian<br />

impiety. Indeed, John’s relationship with the church was<br />

tumultuous. His reign coincided with the papacy of<br />

Innocent III, a formidable canon lawyer, and the author<br />

of numerous treatises on liturgy and asceticism. He was<br />

also immovable in his belief that he had power over all<br />

the crowned heads of Europe.<br />

The first clash came over the appointment of<br />

the Archbishop of Canterbury. Innocent III favoured<br />

Stephen Langton, a noted scholar and lecturer at the<br />

University of Paris; John favoured his counsellor, John<br />

de Gray, Bishop of Norwich. Innocent proceeded<br />

in consecrating Langton. John, however, refused<br />

to recognise Langton’s new position and he exiled<br />

Langton. Innocent III responded by placing an interdict<br />

on England. Langton used his time in exile well. He<br />

cemented the alliance between rebel barons and the<br />

Church, and his exile became one of the rallying points<br />

of resistance to royal tyranny.<br />

In the medieval mind, these setbacks cemented<br />

two widely held perceptions. First, the military defeats<br />

enhanced the perception that John was losing God’s<br />

favour. Second, arbitrary high taxation cemented<br />

discontent among landowners. The standoff between<br />

throne and altar led to various rumours of plots and<br />

insurgencies; and there was wild speculation about<br />

imminent Divine retribution and a sudden end to the<br />

King’s reign.<br />

John could ill afford such dissent. He was planning<br />

yet another campaign for the re-conquest of lost<br />

territory in France and needed all the support he could<br />

muster. In 1213, a settlement between the Pope and the<br />

King was negotiated; England and Ireland were declared<br />

to be papal fiefs and Stephen Langton was installed at<br />

Canterbury.<br />

However, as John planned to go into battle, he<br />

discovered that he had little support among the barons<br />

who signalled their disapproval by either rejecting the<br />

King’s call to arms or refusing to pay a tax to fund the<br />

army. The barons also had the support of Londoners. In<br />

essence, the King was now dealing with an open revolt.<br />

TIM EVANSON/CC BY-SA 2.0<br />

A close-up of one of the panels of the Canterbury Pulpit at the National Cathedral in Washington, D.C. It depicts the<br />

Magna Carta, King John, and the Archbishop of Canterbury Stephen Langton. The stone pulpit was given as a gift by the<br />

Archbishop of Canterbury, Randall Davidson, in 1907.<br />

The European Conservative 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!