You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
JSOU Report 16-1<br />
Populations were increasingly dependent on local rulers or notables to navigate<br />
the labyrinth of obstacles that accompanied these shifts in imperial<br />
fortunes. In addition, the wars brought shifts in populations that tended<br />
to add an even more complex social and cultural mix to the region. It also<br />
promoted ‘march lords’ whose loyalty often became an important part of<br />
imperial security as they formed a buffer between empires but a barrier<br />
against more local forces of instability. To the point, stability and security<br />
required an imperial or overarching structure that enforced a more or less<br />
reliable political and administrative construct; however, underneath that<br />
structure there existed a highly diverse heterogeneous society.<br />
One of the better illustrations of how these developments affected a longterm<br />
conflict was the struggle for control between the Christian Byzantine<br />
Empire, including what is also referred to as the Eastern Roman Empire<br />
(330-1453 CE), and the Persian Zoroastrian Sassanian Empire (224-651 CE).<br />
It was a long-term struggle that ebbed and flowed for centuries. The battleground<br />
was what this monograph describes as the Greater Levant. At any<br />
given point, it might appear that one side or the other would win the contest.<br />
It was a very complex struggle, and it also required empires to protect<br />
their southern flanks from each other and from tribal raiders originating in<br />
Arabia using semi-independent tribal vassals. The Byzantines employed the<br />
Ghassanids, originally a Yemeni tribal grouping of Azd that migrated into<br />
the Levant, became Christianized and formed a tribal buffer covering the<br />
southern and eastern flanks of the Byzantine Empire. The Lakhmids were<br />
another Yemeni tribe that migrated into the edges of Mesopotamia and the<br />
Sassanian Empire; while at times problematic for the Sassanians, their rivalry<br />
with Ghassanids made them a buffer against Byzantium to the West and the<br />
Arabian tribes to the south.<br />
Despite the utility of the tribes, the Byzantines and the Sassanians<br />
attempted to impose a level of control over both that undermined the symbiotic<br />
relationship. Although Christian, the Ghassanids belonged to a Jacobite<br />
sect that the Byzantine Church viewed as heretical—the resulting persecution<br />
opened fissures in that alliance. The Sassanians became increasingly<br />
concerned with the military and economic power accumulated by Lakhmids,<br />
and in the early 7th century, the Sassanians annexed the Lakhmid buffer<br />
state. Thus, in an attempt to extend control, both empires stepped over the<br />
line with their vassals in attempting to impose conformity. It proved fatal<br />
to one and severely damaged the other.<br />
14