11.05.2016 Views

Collapse

JSOU16-1_Barrett_IraqSyria_final

JSOU16-1_Barrett_IraqSyria_final

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

JSOU Report 16-1<br />

Populations were increasingly dependent on local rulers or notables to navigate<br />

the labyrinth of obstacles that accompanied these shifts in imperial<br />

fortunes. In addition, the wars brought shifts in populations that tended<br />

to add an even more complex social and cultural mix to the region. It also<br />

promoted ‘march lords’ whose loyalty often became an important part of<br />

imperial security as they formed a buffer between empires but a barrier<br />

against more local forces of instability. To the point, stability and security<br />

required an imperial or overarching structure that enforced a more or less<br />

reliable political and administrative construct; however, underneath that<br />

structure there existed a highly diverse heterogeneous society.<br />

One of the better illustrations of how these developments affected a longterm<br />

conflict was the struggle for control between the Christian Byzantine<br />

Empire, including what is also referred to as the Eastern Roman Empire<br />

(330-1453 CE), and the Persian Zoroastrian Sassanian Empire (224-651 CE).<br />

It was a long-term struggle that ebbed and flowed for centuries. The battleground<br />

was what this monograph describes as the Greater Levant. At any<br />

given point, it might appear that one side or the other would win the contest.<br />

It was a very complex struggle, and it also required empires to protect<br />

their southern flanks from each other and from tribal raiders originating in<br />

Arabia using semi-independent tribal vassals. The Byzantines employed the<br />

Ghassanids, originally a Yemeni tribal grouping of Azd that migrated into<br />

the Levant, became Christianized and formed a tribal buffer covering the<br />

southern and eastern flanks of the Byzantine Empire. The Lakhmids were<br />

another Yemeni tribe that migrated into the edges of Mesopotamia and the<br />

Sassanian Empire; while at times problematic for the Sassanians, their rivalry<br />

with Ghassanids made them a buffer against Byzantium to the West and the<br />

Arabian tribes to the south.<br />

Despite the utility of the tribes, the Byzantines and the Sassanians<br />

attempted to impose a level of control over both that undermined the symbiotic<br />

relationship. Although Christian, the Ghassanids belonged to a Jacobite<br />

sect that the Byzantine Church viewed as heretical—the resulting persecution<br />

opened fissures in that alliance. The Sassanians became increasingly<br />

concerned with the military and economic power accumulated by Lakhmids,<br />

and in the early 7th century, the Sassanians annexed the Lakhmid buffer<br />

state. Thus, in an attempt to extend control, both empires stepped over the<br />

line with their vassals in attempting to impose conformity. It proved fatal<br />

to one and severely damaged the other.<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!