11.05.2016 Views

Collapse

JSOU16-1_Barrett_IraqSyria_final

JSOU16-1_Barrett_IraqSyria_final

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Barrett: The <strong>Collapse</strong> of Iraq and Syria<br />

had no intention of continuing to support the Sons of Iraq program that<br />

armed Sunni elements in the fight against terrorists and al-Qaeda. There<br />

was concern at the time that strategically the ‘Surge policy’ was reinstituting<br />

tribalization in Iraq and thus further fracturing what was left of the Iraqi<br />

state and assuring it could not be reconstituted. It also served to heighten<br />

sectarianism across the board. 176 By this time, the U.S. was trapped. The goal<br />

was to stabilize the situation and enable a withdrawal, but for all intents<br />

and purposes without large numbers of U.S. troops to prop it up, Iraq as a<br />

state had already ceased to exist. The Shi’a, now with Iranian backing, were<br />

creating a sectarian state in which the Sunnis were second-class citizens or<br />

worse—enemies of the state.<br />

This had an interesting effect. It erased what was left of the border between<br />

Iraq and Syria; the line on the map became meaningless. In a 2010 discussion<br />

with Lieutenant General Talib al-Kenanai, the director of counterterrorism<br />

in the Maliki government, on security issues for Iraq, Syria and the lack of<br />

control in the border regions was the paramount concern. 177 The U.S. invasion,<br />

the destruction of the Iraqi army, the removal of Sunnis from positions<br />

of responsibility, and then the campaigns to subdue the Sunni insurrection<br />

had linked Sunni resistance in Iraq to the Sunnis of Syria in a manner that<br />

had not existed since the Ottomans. Smuggling routes from Iraq to Syria to<br />

support sectarian brothers in the Alawite-dominated state now moved from<br />

Syria to Iraq to support the insurgency. Designed to elude Syrian government<br />

control, Damascus could impede but not stop the flow, particularly in light<br />

of the fact that from 2005 to 2007, there was little control on the border. The<br />

surge reinstituted control but only through the aggressive forward posture<br />

of U.S. troops, and then not completely.<br />

After the surge and the withdrawal of U.S. forces at the behest of the<br />

Iraqi government, control on the border<br />

collapsed again. This not only affected the<br />

security situation in Iraq, but it also created<br />

problems in Syria as well. By 2010-<br />

2011, the failure of the Shi’a government<br />

in Baghdad and the Alawite government<br />

in Damascus to address fundamental<br />

political, economic, and social issues with<br />

The Shi’a, now with Iranian<br />

backing, were creating a<br />

sectarian state in which the<br />

Sunnis were second-class<br />

citizens or worse—enemies<br />

of the state.<br />

their Sunni populations turned eastern Syria and western Iraq into a Sunni<br />

powder keg requiring little to set it off. In Syria, the growing affluence of the<br />

85

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!