11.05.2016 Views

Collapse

JSOU16-1_Barrett_IraqSyria_final

JSOU16-1_Barrett_IraqSyria_final

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Barrett: The <strong>Collapse</strong> of Iraq and Syria<br />

agreement as a tactical arrangement to protect Ottoman interests in the<br />

Gulf and reiterating that he would abide by his agreements with the Porte. 19<br />

The negotiations with Hussein ibn Ali al-Hashimi (1854-1931), the Grand<br />

Sharif of Mecca, were even more vexing for the British. There was a large<br />

Ottoman garrison in Medina, and Sharif Hussein had even more reason to be<br />

cautious about his secret negotiations with the British. In addition, between<br />

1914 and 1916, the war in general and particularly in the Middle East was<br />

not going well for the British. The Ottoman system in the Greater Levant<br />

was proving more durable than anyone had anticipated. The Sunni Arabs<br />

of Mesopotamia and the Levant had remained for the most part loyal to the<br />

Porte and had accounted well for themselves particularly in defensive battles.<br />

The Gallipoli campaign began in April 1915 against Istanbul ended in a<br />

humiliating disaster for the Allies in January 1916. What the British believed<br />

would be a lightning Mesopotamian<br />

campaign aimed at Baghdad<br />

was a study in incompetence. Their<br />

1916 attempt to capture Baghdad<br />

met with disaster. In April, the<br />

The Ottoman system in the Greater<br />

Levant was proving more durable<br />

than anyone had anticipated.<br />

invasion force surrounded by Turkish troops at Kut al-Amara was forced<br />

to surrender—most of the prisoners either died in a death march north or<br />

in captivity. Given the stalemate on the Western Front and missteps in the<br />

Middle East, it was unclear whether the British would win. From the point<br />

of view of the Arabs in the Levant and Mesopotamia, the lines of starving<br />

British prisoners streaming north up the Tigris valley put an exclamation<br />

point on the risks of revolting against the Turks.<br />

Then there was the other war—the bureaucratic war being fought between<br />

the Arab Bureau in Cairo supporting the Hashemites and the Viceroy of<br />

India and his advisors, including Sir Percy Cox and Major Shakespeare, who<br />

believed that the Sauds were a far stronger candidate to upend the Turks<br />

and their supporters in the region. Officials in India believed that between<br />

the jihad declared by the Ottomans in Istanbul against the British and the<br />

prickly demands by Sharif Hussein for a new Hashemite Caliphate, a Muslim<br />

movement could be created that would threaten the British position in India.<br />

Fromkin summed it up succinctly:<br />

As the war progressed, British officials who ruled India increasingly<br />

came to believe that their most dangerous adversaries were<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!