02.06.2016 Views

Connecting Global Priorities Biodiversity and Human Health

1ZcgwtN

1ZcgwtN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>and</strong> the evolution of a more suitable habitat for<br />

invasive alien species.<br />

eiht of the eidene <strong>and</strong> further<br />

researh needs<br />

• Research to date has shown strong evidence<br />

for the overlapping drivers of disease emergence<br />

<strong>and</strong> biodiversity loss. Anthropogenic activities<br />

are rapidly altering ecological <strong>and</strong> evolutionary<br />

systems under which hosts <strong>and</strong> pathogens<br />

operate, creating new dynamics <strong>and</strong> opportunities<br />

for disease transmission <strong>and</strong> spread.<br />

• Further investigation is needed around the<br />

ecological factors (e.g. community composition,<br />

abundance, etc.) affecting disease risks for humans<br />

<strong>and</strong> other species in ecosystems. Disease ecology<br />

studies can provide insight on both host <strong>and</strong><br />

pathogen dynamics. Underst<strong>and</strong>ing of disease<br />

in an ecosystem can be best served through<br />

One <strong>Health</strong> approaches that consider the links<br />

between humans, animals <strong>and</strong> the environment,<br />

thus providing a more integrated <strong>and</strong> broader<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of disease risks as well as<br />

prevention <strong>and</strong> control strategies.<br />

• Environmental impact assessments (EIAs)<br />

provide useful tools to guide risk prevention <strong>and</strong><br />

mitigation. Incorporating health risks into EIA<br />

processes can provide a more robust evaluation of<br />

risks, including the high financial cost of potential<br />

disease emergence <strong>and</strong> outbreaks. Disease may<br />

also have significant impacts on ecosystems (e.g.<br />

to wild species <strong>and</strong> their provision of ecosystem<br />

services) in addition to human health.<br />

3.2 One <strong>Health</strong> approach to drivers of<br />

infectious diseases<br />

The integral infectious disease connections<br />

between domestic animals, humans <strong>and</strong><br />

ecosystems are exemplified by the highly<br />

pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1<br />

panzootic. Evolving from a low-pathogenic<br />

strain, intensive poultry production, paired with<br />

inadequate biosecurity, enabled the emergence<br />

<strong>and</strong> spread of H5N1 among poultry flocks,<br />

geographies, <strong>and</strong> species, including infection<br />

of wild birds <strong>and</strong> humans (Karesh et al. 2012)<br />

Similarly, many neglected infectious diseases<br />

have an animal link. For example, echinococcosis,<br />

a zoonotic pathogen transmitted from a dog<br />

tapeworm, causes 200 000 human cases each year,<br />

costs an estimated US$ 2 billion in losses annually<br />

to the global livestock industry, <strong>and</strong> infects a range<br />

of wild species (Cardona et al. 2013; Karesh et al.<br />

2012). These examples highlight the importance<br />

of disease surveillance across the species spectrum<br />

to enable early detection or early warning systems.<br />

While in some cases disease control measures may<br />

be harmful to biodiversity, they can also yield<br />

benefits for wildlife. Mass vaccination of cattle<br />

for rinderpest boosted wildebeest population<br />

numbers after large drops attributed to rinderpest<br />

infection. Surveillance in wildlife has subsequently<br />

been used to monitor rinderpest circulation<br />

(Couacy-Hymann et al. 2005). Surveillance <strong>and</strong><br />

reporting employing a One <strong>Health</strong> approach<br />

may provide sentinel benefits to enable early<br />

detection of pathogens potentially transmissible<br />

between humans, wild species, <strong>and</strong> livestock.<br />

This is especially important given chronic underreporting<br />

of disease in animals, including in food<br />

production, as well as changing ecological factors<br />

from climate change (de Balogh et al. 2013; Pinto<br />

et al. 2008).<br />

In order to move from the currently reactive<br />

response to infectious disease emergence <strong>and</strong><br />

spread, we must also go a step further to address<br />

the underlying drivers of disease emergence, many<br />

which also overlap with drivers of biodiversity loss<br />

(FAO 2013; Karesh et al. 2012; CBD 2012). This<br />

requires an integrated effort around ecosystems,<br />

human, <strong>and</strong> animal health, rather than a siloed<br />

one-species or one-discipline perspective. A One<br />

<strong>Health</strong> or ecohealth approach that considers<br />

the links between humans, animals (domestic<br />

<strong>and</strong> wild), <strong>and</strong> the environment can improve<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of infectious disease drivers <strong>and</strong><br />

dynamics <strong>and</strong> move from response to prevention<br />

measures (FAO 2013; Karesh et al. 2012). Given<br />

the high costs of disease emergence events (for<br />

example, the 2003 outbreak of SARS cost the<br />

global economy an estimated US$ 30 billion) <strong>and</strong><br />

significant public health impacts (over one billion<br />

cases of infectious diseases annually), both the<br />

economic <strong>and</strong> health arguments for tackling root<br />

<strong>Connecting</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Priorities</strong>: <strong>Biodiversity</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Health</strong><br />

145

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!