Connecting Global Priorities Biodiversity and Human Health
1ZcgwtN
1ZcgwtN
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>and</strong> the evolution of a more suitable habitat for<br />
invasive alien species.<br />
eiht of the eidene <strong>and</strong> further<br />
researh needs<br />
• Research to date has shown strong evidence<br />
for the overlapping drivers of disease emergence<br />
<strong>and</strong> biodiversity loss. Anthropogenic activities<br />
are rapidly altering ecological <strong>and</strong> evolutionary<br />
systems under which hosts <strong>and</strong> pathogens<br />
operate, creating new dynamics <strong>and</strong> opportunities<br />
for disease transmission <strong>and</strong> spread.<br />
• Further investigation is needed around the<br />
ecological factors (e.g. community composition,<br />
abundance, etc.) affecting disease risks for humans<br />
<strong>and</strong> other species in ecosystems. Disease ecology<br />
studies can provide insight on both host <strong>and</strong><br />
pathogen dynamics. Underst<strong>and</strong>ing of disease<br />
in an ecosystem can be best served through<br />
One <strong>Health</strong> approaches that consider the links<br />
between humans, animals <strong>and</strong> the environment,<br />
thus providing a more integrated <strong>and</strong> broader<br />
underst<strong>and</strong>ing of disease risks as well as<br />
prevention <strong>and</strong> control strategies.<br />
• Environmental impact assessments (EIAs)<br />
provide useful tools to guide risk prevention <strong>and</strong><br />
mitigation. Incorporating health risks into EIA<br />
processes can provide a more robust evaluation of<br />
risks, including the high financial cost of potential<br />
disease emergence <strong>and</strong> outbreaks. Disease may<br />
also have significant impacts on ecosystems (e.g.<br />
to wild species <strong>and</strong> their provision of ecosystem<br />
services) in addition to human health.<br />
3.2 One <strong>Health</strong> approach to drivers of<br />
infectious diseases<br />
The integral infectious disease connections<br />
between domestic animals, humans <strong>and</strong><br />
ecosystems are exemplified by the highly<br />
pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1<br />
panzootic. Evolving from a low-pathogenic<br />
strain, intensive poultry production, paired with<br />
inadequate biosecurity, enabled the emergence<br />
<strong>and</strong> spread of H5N1 among poultry flocks,<br />
geographies, <strong>and</strong> species, including infection<br />
of wild birds <strong>and</strong> humans (Karesh et al. 2012)<br />
Similarly, many neglected infectious diseases<br />
have an animal link. For example, echinococcosis,<br />
a zoonotic pathogen transmitted from a dog<br />
tapeworm, causes 200 000 human cases each year,<br />
costs an estimated US$ 2 billion in losses annually<br />
to the global livestock industry, <strong>and</strong> infects a range<br />
of wild species (Cardona et al. 2013; Karesh et al.<br />
2012). These examples highlight the importance<br />
of disease surveillance across the species spectrum<br />
to enable early detection or early warning systems.<br />
While in some cases disease control measures may<br />
be harmful to biodiversity, they can also yield<br />
benefits for wildlife. Mass vaccination of cattle<br />
for rinderpest boosted wildebeest population<br />
numbers after large drops attributed to rinderpest<br />
infection. Surveillance in wildlife has subsequently<br />
been used to monitor rinderpest circulation<br />
(Couacy-Hymann et al. 2005). Surveillance <strong>and</strong><br />
reporting employing a One <strong>Health</strong> approach<br />
may provide sentinel benefits to enable early<br />
detection of pathogens potentially transmissible<br />
between humans, wild species, <strong>and</strong> livestock.<br />
This is especially important given chronic underreporting<br />
of disease in animals, including in food<br />
production, as well as changing ecological factors<br />
from climate change (de Balogh et al. 2013; Pinto<br />
et al. 2008).<br />
In order to move from the currently reactive<br />
response to infectious disease emergence <strong>and</strong><br />
spread, we must also go a step further to address<br />
the underlying drivers of disease emergence, many<br />
which also overlap with drivers of biodiversity loss<br />
(FAO 2013; Karesh et al. 2012; CBD 2012). This<br />
requires an integrated effort around ecosystems,<br />
human, <strong>and</strong> animal health, rather than a siloed<br />
one-species or one-discipline perspective. A One<br />
<strong>Health</strong> or ecohealth approach that considers<br />
the links between humans, animals (domestic<br />
<strong>and</strong> wild), <strong>and</strong> the environment can improve<br />
underst<strong>and</strong>ing of infectious disease drivers <strong>and</strong><br />
dynamics <strong>and</strong> move from response to prevention<br />
measures (FAO 2013; Karesh et al. 2012). Given<br />
the high costs of disease emergence events (for<br />
example, the 2003 outbreak of SARS cost the<br />
global economy an estimated US$ 30 billion) <strong>and</strong><br />
significant public health impacts (over one billion<br />
cases of infectious diseases annually), both the<br />
economic <strong>and</strong> health arguments for tackling root<br />
<strong>Connecting</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Priorities</strong>: <strong>Biodiversity</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Health</strong><br />
145