Connecting Global Priorities Biodiversity and Human Health
1ZcgwtN
1ZcgwtN
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
7. Shaping behaviour <strong>and</strong><br />
engaging communities for<br />
transformational change<br />
<strong>Human</strong> behaviour is central to the biodiversityhuman<br />
health nexus: our actions, as producers<br />
<strong>and</strong> consumers of energy, natural resources <strong>and</strong><br />
manufactured products, are prime determinants<br />
of both the ability to conserve biodiversity <strong>and</strong><br />
to promote human health. Therefore, managing,<br />
<strong>and</strong> benefiting from, the interlinkages between<br />
biodiversity, ecosystems services <strong>and</strong> human<br />
health increasingly dem<strong>and</strong>s broad-scale<br />
interventions that effectively <strong>and</strong> sustainably<br />
influence human behaviour (Freya et al. 2010;<br />
Fulton et al. 2011; The Lancet 2015).<br />
The social sciences can assist us to motivate<br />
choices consistent with health <strong>and</strong> biodiversity<br />
objectives <strong>and</strong> to develop new approaches through,<br />
inter alia, better underst<strong>and</strong>ing of behavioural<br />
change, production <strong>and</strong> consumption patterns,<br />
policy development, <strong>and</strong> the use of non-market<br />
tools (CBD 2013a). Accordingly, the development<br />
of work on values, institutions <strong>and</strong> behaviour is<br />
needed (CBD 2013b; Duraiappah et al 2014).² It<br />
has been argued that intervention efforts that also<br />
seek to modify the physical, social, political, <strong>and</strong><br />
economic environments in which people live <strong>and</strong><br />
make health <strong>and</strong> environment related decisions<br />
can jointly deliver health, environmental <strong>and</strong><br />
social benefits (e.g. Allegr<strong>and</strong>e 2015 <strong>and</strong> references<br />
therein; Pons-Vigués et al. 2014).³ Core elements<br />
to promote behaviour change on a global scale<br />
include:<br />
i) Underst<strong>and</strong>ing the drivers of human<br />
behaviour <strong>and</strong> the role of micro- <strong>and</strong> macrolevel<br />
processes (including political, social,<br />
environmental <strong>and</strong> economic institutions <strong>and</strong><br />
structures) in mediating positive change;<br />
ii) Recognizing that influencing human behaviour<br />
can take many forms but that strategies should<br />
be tailored to specific contexts <strong>and</strong> issues; <strong>and</strong><br />
iii) Addressing the significant gap in knowledge<br />
on what works, how <strong>and</strong> why, in order to<br />
develop evidence-based best practices that can<br />
be scaled-up for sustainability.<br />
Tackling these <strong>and</strong> other aspects of human<br />
behaviour change can have far-reaching<br />
implications for poverty alleviation, human health<br />
<strong>and</strong> biodiversity conservation (Allegrante 2015;<br />
Barrett et al. 2011). Each of these is relevant to<br />
building a culture of health that is in line with social<br />
<strong>and</strong> environmental objectives, including those<br />
embedded in the Strategic Plan for <strong>Biodiversity</strong><br />
2011–2020 <strong>and</strong> its Aichi biodiversity targets, <strong>and</strong><br />
the emerging sustainable development goals.<br />
Underst<strong>and</strong>ing the drivers of human behaviour<br />
requires moving beyond rational individualistic<br />
behaviour models in order to appreciate the<br />
complexities of daily life, social <strong>and</strong> economic<br />
incentives for change, <strong>and</strong> actual processes of<br />
change (Hargreaves 2011; Pons-Vigués et al.<br />
2014). Social, cultural <strong>and</strong> psychological factors<br />
interact in complex ways with broader economic,<br />
political <strong>and</strong> environmental processes (Marmot et<br />
al. 2008; Waylen et al. 2010). Designing effective<br />
<strong>and</strong> sustainable behaviour change interventions<br />
also dem<strong>and</strong>s that we account for the perceptions,<br />
needs, capacities, heterogeneity <strong>and</strong> constraints<br />
of communities. Engaging with human behaviour<br />
change also involves underst<strong>and</strong>ing complexity at<br />
different scales, which requires multi-disciplinary<br />
approaches. In addition to the need to further<br />
strengthen the scientific base of a broad range<br />
of issues at the intersect of biodiversity <strong>and</strong><br />
health, there is also a need for policymakers<br />
<strong>and</strong> practitioners to draw deeply from the social<br />
sciences (psychology, anthropology, sociology,<br />
political science <strong>and</strong> other fields) in order to<br />
inform strategies (Glanz <strong>and</strong> Bishop 2010).<br />
Moreover, the traditional values of indigenous<br />
<strong>and</strong> local communities can sometimes provide<br />
critical foundations for positive behaviour change;<br />
recognizing these values <strong>and</strong> working with these<br />
groups to develop more sustainable production<br />
² UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/17/INF/1<br />
³ The effectiveness of such approaches in addressing ethical considerations or reducing health disparities has also been<br />
questioned (Lieberman et al. 2013).<br />
<strong>Connecting</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Priorities</strong>: <strong>Biodiversity</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Health</strong><br />
269