02.06.2016 Views

Connecting Global Priorities Biodiversity and Human Health

1ZcgwtN

1ZcgwtN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

disease concern for humans as well a mammalian<br />

domestic animals <strong>and</strong> wildlife, killing over 50 000<br />

people annually worldwide, necessitating ongoing<br />

vaccination <strong>and</strong>/or population control methods<br />

in domestic animals, <strong>and</strong> causing major declines<br />

in some wild canid populations (e.g. African<br />

Wild Dog <strong>and</strong> Ethiopian Bale Wolf populations).<br />

Moreover, disease spill-over is not one-directional;<br />

wild <strong>and</strong> domestic animal populations may acquire<br />

disease directly from human contact. Integrated<br />

surveillance <strong>and</strong> control campaigns may be costeffective<br />

means for the early identification of<br />

threats before they harm humans, domestic<br />

animals, or wild species (Machalaba <strong>and</strong> Karesh<br />

2012).<br />

3.4 Systems approach <strong>and</strong> collaboration<br />

While most emerging diseases originate in<br />

wildlife, sustained infections are commonly<br />

transmitted among humans or through a domestic<br />

animal connection (Kock 2014). For example,<br />

HIV originated in non-human primates, but<br />

its principal ongoing transmission source for<br />

new infections is human–human. However,<br />

given the population impacts of HIV <strong>and</strong> other<br />

diseases that have emerged from wildlife, there<br />

are opportunities to move upstream toward<br />

more preventive efforts for future disease while<br />

still focusing on mitigating impacts of current<br />

ones. Vector-borne disease will always be a<br />

challenge for control from ongoing movement<br />

across boundaries (but it is the vector, <strong>and</strong> not<br />

wild host, which matters here) <strong>and</strong> attempts to<br />

eliminate vectors are frequently ineffective or<br />

lead to unintended <strong>and</strong> detrimental ecological<br />

consequences. Despite this, the main concern<br />

related to biodiversity <strong>and</strong> emerging disease<br />

remains the spill-over of microorganisms from<br />

wildlife into human-modified l<strong>and</strong>scapes where<br />

the organisms occasionally evolve into pathogens<br />

(e.g. corona <strong>and</strong> influenza viruses). Importantly,<br />

the evolution of these pathogens is largely driven<br />

by the human system itself (l<strong>and</strong>scape, domestic<br />

animals, artificial habitats, behaviour) <strong>and</strong> through<br />

peri-domestic wild species that have adapted to<br />

the modified l<strong>and</strong>scape (Kock 2013; Jones et al.<br />

2013). Infectious disease funding streams are<br />

currently heavily directed toward human–human<br />

prevention of new cases, but dedicating a small<br />

portion of funds to preventing future disease<br />

emergence could yield downstream cost savings.<br />

To tackle the issues described above requires a<br />

highly collaborative <strong>and</strong> interdisciplinary, systems<br />

approach. But, the big question is, where to start?<br />

There is currently no reliable toolkit to accurately<br />

determine which of the c<strong>and</strong>idate infectious agents<br />

will emerge as pathogens. Given limited resources<br />

<strong>and</strong> millions of potential species <strong>and</strong> billions of<br />

potential strains of micro-organisms, starting<br />

efforts might be targeted to detecting pathogen<br />

families that are known to be highly pathogenic to<br />

humans <strong>and</strong> other species <strong>and</strong> taking preventive<br />

measures, <strong>and</strong> refining risk analyses for wider<br />

pathogen pools as more knowledge is generated.<br />

In light of this evidence, measures <strong>and</strong> policies to<br />

reduce risk of spill-over should include:<br />

• On a precautionary principle, avoidance of<br />

high-density monoculture agriculture <strong>and</strong> human<br />

activity/settlement adjacent to highly biodiverse<br />

ecosystems (especially urban centres, mining,<br />

industrial <strong>and</strong> intensive livestock systems).<br />

• Utilization of an ecological or “One <strong>Health</strong>”<br />

approach to disease, rather than a simplistic “one<br />

germ, one disease” approach to provide a richer<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of human, animal <strong>and</strong> environment<br />

health links.<br />

• High biosecurity of all industrial <strong>and</strong> intensive<br />

animal <strong>and</strong> plant agriculture, <strong>and</strong> more judicious<br />

or prudent use of antimicrobial agents in both<br />

human <strong>and</strong> animal medicine <strong>and</strong> food production<br />

systems to reduce selection pressure for evolution<br />

of resistant strains.<br />

• More resilient diverse agriculture <strong>and</strong><br />

sustainable harvesting systems. In the case of the<br />

latter some species are high risk for pathogens<br />

<strong>and</strong> should not be included in the human diet,<br />

e.g. non-human primates given their high<br />

genetic relatedness to humans (additionally, they<br />

constitute an unsustainable protein source). For<br />

example, the origin of the 2014 human Ebola<br />

outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo<br />

was linked to the butchering of an infected<br />

148 <strong>Connecting</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Priorities</strong>: <strong>Biodiversity</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Health</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!