Connecting Global Priorities Biodiversity and Human Health
1ZcgwtN
1ZcgwtN
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
disease concern for humans as well a mammalian<br />
domestic animals <strong>and</strong> wildlife, killing over 50 000<br />
people annually worldwide, necessitating ongoing<br />
vaccination <strong>and</strong>/or population control methods<br />
in domestic animals, <strong>and</strong> causing major declines<br />
in some wild canid populations (e.g. African<br />
Wild Dog <strong>and</strong> Ethiopian Bale Wolf populations).<br />
Moreover, disease spill-over is not one-directional;<br />
wild <strong>and</strong> domestic animal populations may acquire<br />
disease directly from human contact. Integrated<br />
surveillance <strong>and</strong> control campaigns may be costeffective<br />
means for the early identification of<br />
threats before they harm humans, domestic<br />
animals, or wild species (Machalaba <strong>and</strong> Karesh<br />
2012).<br />
3.4 Systems approach <strong>and</strong> collaboration<br />
While most emerging diseases originate in<br />
wildlife, sustained infections are commonly<br />
transmitted among humans or through a domestic<br />
animal connection (Kock 2014). For example,<br />
HIV originated in non-human primates, but<br />
its principal ongoing transmission source for<br />
new infections is human–human. However,<br />
given the population impacts of HIV <strong>and</strong> other<br />
diseases that have emerged from wildlife, there<br />
are opportunities to move upstream toward<br />
more preventive efforts for future disease while<br />
still focusing on mitigating impacts of current<br />
ones. Vector-borne disease will always be a<br />
challenge for control from ongoing movement<br />
across boundaries (but it is the vector, <strong>and</strong> not<br />
wild host, which matters here) <strong>and</strong> attempts to<br />
eliminate vectors are frequently ineffective or<br />
lead to unintended <strong>and</strong> detrimental ecological<br />
consequences. Despite this, the main concern<br />
related to biodiversity <strong>and</strong> emerging disease<br />
remains the spill-over of microorganisms from<br />
wildlife into human-modified l<strong>and</strong>scapes where<br />
the organisms occasionally evolve into pathogens<br />
(e.g. corona <strong>and</strong> influenza viruses). Importantly,<br />
the evolution of these pathogens is largely driven<br />
by the human system itself (l<strong>and</strong>scape, domestic<br />
animals, artificial habitats, behaviour) <strong>and</strong> through<br />
peri-domestic wild species that have adapted to<br />
the modified l<strong>and</strong>scape (Kock 2013; Jones et al.<br />
2013). Infectious disease funding streams are<br />
currently heavily directed toward human–human<br />
prevention of new cases, but dedicating a small<br />
portion of funds to preventing future disease<br />
emergence could yield downstream cost savings.<br />
To tackle the issues described above requires a<br />
highly collaborative <strong>and</strong> interdisciplinary, systems<br />
approach. But, the big question is, where to start?<br />
There is currently no reliable toolkit to accurately<br />
determine which of the c<strong>and</strong>idate infectious agents<br />
will emerge as pathogens. Given limited resources<br />
<strong>and</strong> millions of potential species <strong>and</strong> billions of<br />
potential strains of micro-organisms, starting<br />
efforts might be targeted to detecting pathogen<br />
families that are known to be highly pathogenic to<br />
humans <strong>and</strong> other species <strong>and</strong> taking preventive<br />
measures, <strong>and</strong> refining risk analyses for wider<br />
pathogen pools as more knowledge is generated.<br />
In light of this evidence, measures <strong>and</strong> policies to<br />
reduce risk of spill-over should include:<br />
• On a precautionary principle, avoidance of<br />
high-density monoculture agriculture <strong>and</strong> human<br />
activity/settlement adjacent to highly biodiverse<br />
ecosystems (especially urban centres, mining,<br />
industrial <strong>and</strong> intensive livestock systems).<br />
• Utilization of an ecological or “One <strong>Health</strong>”<br />
approach to disease, rather than a simplistic “one<br />
germ, one disease” approach to provide a richer<br />
underst<strong>and</strong>ing of human, animal <strong>and</strong> environment<br />
health links.<br />
• High biosecurity of all industrial <strong>and</strong> intensive<br />
animal <strong>and</strong> plant agriculture, <strong>and</strong> more judicious<br />
or prudent use of antimicrobial agents in both<br />
human <strong>and</strong> animal medicine <strong>and</strong> food production<br />
systems to reduce selection pressure for evolution<br />
of resistant strains.<br />
• More resilient diverse agriculture <strong>and</strong><br />
sustainable harvesting systems. In the case of the<br />
latter some species are high risk for pathogens<br />
<strong>and</strong> should not be included in the human diet,<br />
e.g. non-human primates given their high<br />
genetic relatedness to humans (additionally, they<br />
constitute an unsustainable protein source). For<br />
example, the origin of the 2014 human Ebola<br />
outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo<br />
was linked to the butchering of an infected<br />
148 <strong>Connecting</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Priorities</strong>: <strong>Biodiversity</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Health</strong>