08.06.2016 Views

DESIGNING PROJECTS IN A RAPIDLY CHANGING WORLD

srun3013fp1

srun3013fp1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Options and<br />

Pathways<br />

Learning<br />

A primary RAPTA activity in this phase.<br />

Work with multi-stakeholder processes to<br />

ensure on-ground actions consistent with<br />

implementation pathways<br />

A primary RAPTA activity in this phase.<br />

Revise and implement Learning plan<br />

developed Phase 2<br />

Project outputs and outcomes meeting project<br />

requirements for: “scaling up”, cross-scale integration<br />

and mainstreamed capacity for beyond the project<br />

Outputs for Learning reporting (e.g. indicators elicited<br />

by RAPTA in Phases 1 and 2, RAPTA meta-indicators<br />

for quality of stakeholder engagement, quality of<br />

assessment process)<br />

4.5 PHASE 4: POST-PROJECT<br />

A precondition for GEF funding is that the beneficiary<br />

country is already heavily invested in the project<br />

goal, while GEF’s objective in funding projects is to<br />

ensure that their actions and impacts will be sustained<br />

beyond the life of the project. Any enduring system<br />

change and ultimate achievement of the project goal<br />

will depend upon maintaining and mobilizing the<br />

stakeholder capacity established in earlier phases.<br />

This may be evidenced by new institutions, policies,<br />

funding and partnerships, and enhanced human and<br />

ecosystem well-being.<br />

This phase remains within the project’s sphere of<br />

interest but outside its sphere of control and influence<br />

(Figure 21). As emphasized in Section 3.1, the<br />

intention of the RAPTA process is to build capacity<br />

for systemic change – but not to prescribe or enforce<br />

this. Hence, it is possible that stakeholders will choose<br />

not to implement change, and the outcomes from<br />

Phases 1, 2 and 3 will recede. As a consequence,<br />

the knowledge, processes and networks established<br />

in these phases will also unravel with time and with<br />

them, stakeholders’ capacity for change will recede.<br />

While not an objective of RAPTA, periodic evaluation<br />

in Phase 4 is useful to assess the long-term impacts<br />

of the project, and the reasons for the ultimate trajectory<br />

of stakeholders’ capacity. Such Learning provides<br />

valuable insights for the future design of similar programs<br />

based on a multi-stakeholder RAPTA process.<br />

The GEF investment builds on an existing baseline of<br />

activities by ministries and agencies, which demonstrate<br />

an existing interest and investment in the<br />

project idea. The GEF seeks to unlock barriers (e.g.<br />

capacity, markets, etc.) to that idea being realized at<br />

scale and so ensure global environmental benefits.<br />

The importance of RAPTA in this case is to help the<br />

project design and monitor implementation pathways<br />

to unlock barriers and increase likelihood of<br />

sustained impact beyond the project.<br />

RAPTA in the GEF project cycle 91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!