DESIGNING PROJECTS IN A RAPIDLY CHANGING WORLD
srun3013fp1
srun3013fp1
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Options and<br />
Pathways<br />
Learning<br />
A primary RAPTA activity in this phase.<br />
Work with multi-stakeholder processes to<br />
ensure on-ground actions consistent with<br />
implementation pathways<br />
A primary RAPTA activity in this phase.<br />
Revise and implement Learning plan<br />
developed Phase 2<br />
Project outputs and outcomes meeting project<br />
requirements for: “scaling up”, cross-scale integration<br />
and mainstreamed capacity for beyond the project<br />
Outputs for Learning reporting (e.g. indicators elicited<br />
by RAPTA in Phases 1 and 2, RAPTA meta-indicators<br />
for quality of stakeholder engagement, quality of<br />
assessment process)<br />
4.5 PHASE 4: POST-PROJECT<br />
A precondition for GEF funding is that the beneficiary<br />
country is already heavily invested in the project<br />
goal, while GEF’s objective in funding projects is to<br />
ensure that their actions and impacts will be sustained<br />
beyond the life of the project. Any enduring system<br />
change and ultimate achievement of the project goal<br />
will depend upon maintaining and mobilizing the<br />
stakeholder capacity established in earlier phases.<br />
This may be evidenced by new institutions, policies,<br />
funding and partnerships, and enhanced human and<br />
ecosystem well-being.<br />
This phase remains within the project’s sphere of<br />
interest but outside its sphere of control and influence<br />
(Figure 21). As emphasized in Section 3.1, the<br />
intention of the RAPTA process is to build capacity<br />
for systemic change – but not to prescribe or enforce<br />
this. Hence, it is possible that stakeholders will choose<br />
not to implement change, and the outcomes from<br />
Phases 1, 2 and 3 will recede. As a consequence,<br />
the knowledge, processes and networks established<br />
in these phases will also unravel with time and with<br />
them, stakeholders’ capacity for change will recede.<br />
While not an objective of RAPTA, periodic evaluation<br />
in Phase 4 is useful to assess the long-term impacts<br />
of the project, and the reasons for the ultimate trajectory<br />
of stakeholders’ capacity. Such Learning provides<br />
valuable insights for the future design of similar programs<br />
based on a multi-stakeholder RAPTA process.<br />
The GEF investment builds on an existing baseline of<br />
activities by ministries and agencies, which demonstrate<br />
an existing interest and investment in the<br />
project idea. The GEF seeks to unlock barriers (e.g.<br />
capacity, markets, etc.) to that idea being realized at<br />
scale and so ensure global environmental benefits.<br />
The importance of RAPTA in this case is to help the<br />
project design and monitor implementation pathways<br />
to unlock barriers and increase likelihood of<br />
sustained impact beyond the project.<br />
RAPTA in the GEF project cycle 91