Smart Industry 1/2016
Smart Industry 1/2016 - The IoT Business Magazine - powered by Avnet Silica
Smart Industry 1/2016 - The IoT Business Magazine - powered by Avnet Silica
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Setting Standards<br />
for <strong>Smart</strong> Chips<br />
■ Industrie 4.0<br />
The German industry is getting serious<br />
about “Industrie 4.0”, as the Industrial<br />
Internet is called in that country. At<br />
the recent Hanover Industrial Fair, a<br />
group consisting of virtually all the<br />
major industry associations involved<br />
in manufacture and electronics got<br />
together to found the “Standardization<br />
Council Industrie 4.0” which will be<br />
tasked with helping to create national<br />
and international standards and reference<br />
architectures for IoT applications.<br />
Recognizing that Germany lags behind<br />
others in IoT readiness, the Council will<br />
seek to establish working groups with<br />
associations in other European countries<br />
to create a counterbalance to U.S. domination<br />
in this fi eld. Members include the<br />
Society of German Engineers (VDE), the<br />
IT industry association Bitkom, as well as<br />
the Electronics <strong>Industry</strong> Association ZVEI<br />
and the standards body DIN.<br />
Michael Scholles, who also works for<br />
Fraunhofer’s IPMS. According to him,<br />
the high cost of more powerful <strong>Smart</strong><br />
Sensors is still prohibitive in many<br />
cases, but they are necessary for most<br />
high-value projects in the realm of<br />
IoT. “We need to see a substantial reduction<br />
in sensors’ prices sometime<br />
soon”, he believes. Since wafer space<br />
in semiconductor manufacturing is<br />
limited, the best way to make sensors<br />
cheaper, he believes, is to reduce their<br />
size so you can fit more them on each<br />
substrate. Adding extra technology<br />
to the silicon is not the best idea, he<br />
thinks; a better way would be to try<br />
and combine existing chips in order<br />
to avoid the high costs of developing<br />
new ones.<br />
Dr. Gunther Kegel, the vice president<br />
of the German Engineering Society<br />
(VDE) and CEO of Peperl+Fuchs, an<br />
SME specializing in factory automation<br />
systems, agrees. “The large investment<br />
necessary to create more highly<br />
integrated chips is self-defeating”, he<br />
believes. His solution is to “borrow”<br />
existing technology from other fields.<br />
“Sensors can be made universally<br />
adaptable”, says KIT’s Prof. Beigl, “the<br />
subsequent production steps can’t.”<br />
In order to be integrated into complex<br />
manufacturing processes, systems<br />
need to be easily customized. And in<br />
order to keep the number-crunching<br />
costs as low as possible, reference<br />
architectures and know-how transfer<br />
will be necessary, he believes, if SMEs<br />
are to be able to become the future<br />
champions in a world of IoT. If not,<br />
they will be priced out of the market.<br />
Security is the other big issue companies<br />
worry about when considering<br />
whether to move to <strong>Smart</strong> Sensors.<br />
This is especially true for smaller companies,<br />
especially since most sensors<br />
are manufactured in the Far East or in<br />
America where data protection and<br />
privacy rules are perceived as less<br />
strict than in Europe. They fear that<br />
the quality of their products could sink<br />
and they themselves be swamped by<br />
legal suits brought against them by<br />
irate customers.<br />
“IoT must be fully protected against<br />
shoddy sensors and manipulated<br />
data”, says Oliver Winzenried, CEO of<br />
Wibu Systems, a cybersecurity company.<br />
Sensors should be able to au-<br />
In order to be<br />
integrated into<br />
complex manufacturing<br />
processes,<br />
smart<br />
sensors need<br />
to be easily<br />
customized.<br />
Prof. Michael Beigl<br />
Karlsruhe Institute of<br />
Technology (KIT)<br />
Keeping in touch<br />
<strong>Smart</strong> Sensors with<br />
wireless capability use a<br />
wide range of communications<br />
standards<br />
communicate with other<br />
applications via the Cloud.<br />
thenticate themselves, he believes,<br />
automatically providing proof of their<br />
origin and the integrity of their data<br />
transmission systems. Appropriate<br />
symmetrical and asymmetrical encryption<br />
solutions are available today,<br />
he maintains, but sensor manufacturers<br />
often fail to use them due to cost<br />
concerns. The best way to go about,<br />
Winzenried feels, is to move the authentication<br />
and security functions<br />
to a separate chip, which shouldn’t<br />
cost more than 10 Cents or so. Even<br />
cheaper are pure software solutions,<br />
for which Wibu charges a flat 0.5 percent<br />
of the total price of the systems<br />
they sell. “A sensor that costs 2 Euros<br />
needn’t cost more than one cent extra,”<br />
he says. And software offers the<br />
best possible way of securing a “naked”<br />
sensor, be it ever so smart.<br />
BLE-Link<br />
APP<br />
Sensors<br />
Cloud<br />
Server<br />
APP, IT<br />
application<br />
TCP/IP-Link<br />
SRWN-Link<br />
75