20.09.2016 Views

HF The History of Photography 600pág

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

l 3 8<br />

<strong>The</strong> early years <strong>of</strong> photography<br />

Worked <strong>of</strong>f in celestial and strange mezzotint<br />

A little resembling an elderly print.<br />

'Well, I never!' all cry ; 'it is cruelly like you !'<br />

But Truth is unpleasant<br />

To prince and to peasant.<br />

You recollect Lawrence, and think <strong>of</strong> the graces<br />

That Chalon and Company give to their faces;<br />

<strong>The</strong> face you have worn fifty years doesn't strike you!<br />

Excited though the crowds were, Beard was still more so. Business was beyond his<br />

wildest dreams; the average takings each day are said to have amounted to something<br />

like £150.26 This figure, however, in all probability refers only to the enthusiastic<br />

onrush <strong>of</strong> the first few months, when a daguerreotype portrait was a great<br />

novelty, for N. P. Lerebours in November 1841 remarked27 that the receipts at<br />

Beard's and Claudet's establishments in the early days 'several times amounted to<br />

£60 in one day'. Whatever the exact amount, the takings were undoubtedly very<br />

high, and Beard, realizing the fortune that lay within his grasp if he could secure a<br />

monopoly in photographing 'the human face divine', on 23 June 1841 purchased<br />

from Miles Berry the whole <strong>of</strong> the daguerreotype patent for £800, thus becoming<br />

the sole patentee in England, Wales, and the Colonies. £800 for the right to hold a<br />

monopoly <strong>of</strong> the daguerreotype for the remaining twelve years <strong>of</strong> the patent seems<br />

a trifling sum when we remember that only the year before Daguerre had expected<br />

to obtain five times that amount, and considering that Beard had paid over £7,000<br />

for the right to use Wolcott's camera, which was in fact abandoned within only<br />

two years.<br />

In accordance with the arrangement made between Daguerre and Claudet in 1839,<br />

the patent was first <strong>of</strong>fered to Claudet, but he could not afford it, and his partner,<br />

sceptical about the value <strong>of</strong> the investment, could not be persuaded to finance the<br />

project. In the years to follow, George Houghton must have greatly regretted his<br />

decision, for Beard is said to have taken between £25,00028 and £36,00029 in the<br />

second business year alone from the sale <strong>of</strong> licences and fees from his pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

studios.<br />

Since the summer <strong>of</strong> 1840 Claudet, like Beard, had busied himself trying to find<br />

a means <strong>of</strong> accelerating the daguerreotype process; but, unable to avail himself <strong>of</strong><br />

either Wolcott's camera or Goddard's accelerator bromine, Claudet found a solution<br />

to the problem only two months after Beard had started business. It was in May 1841<br />

that he made the discovery that a combination <strong>of</strong> chlorine and iodine vapour greatly<br />

increased the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the plate. He communicated this accelerating process to<br />

the Royal Society on IO June, a report to the Academie des Sciences in Paris having<br />

been read three days earlier.30 <strong>The</strong> exposure was comparable with Beard's, varying<br />

between IO seconds and 2 minutes according to the strength <strong>of</strong> the sunlight, the time<br />

<strong>of</strong> day, and the season <strong>of</strong> the year. It is astonishing how greatly the exposure varied<br />

from month to month : 'In June I operated in l

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!