20.09.2016 Views

HF The History of Photography 600pág

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> history <strong>of</strong> the camera obscura 29<br />

that Bruce and Balugani drew with these two instruments at the same time and<br />

within talking distance <strong>of</strong> each other.<br />

Edward Dodwell relates in his Classical and Topographical Tour through Gm·tc 50 an<br />

amusing experience he had while sketching with the camera obscura on the Acropolis<br />

in 1805. <strong>The</strong> Turkish governor (Disdar) constantly put difficulties in Dodwell's way,<br />

which could only be overcome by 'gifts' until one day he got rid <strong>of</strong> this mercenary<br />

Turk in a most extraordinary manner. When Dodwell tried to explain the camera<br />

obscura<br />

<strong>The</strong> Disdar no sooner saw the temple instantaneously reflected on the paper in<br />

all its lines and colours, than he imagined that I had produced the effect by some<br />

magical process; his astonishment appeared mingled with alarm . . . . He again<br />

looked into the camera obscura. At that moment, some <strong>of</strong> his soldiers happening<br />

to pass before the reflecting glass, were beheld by the astonished Disdar walking<br />

upon the paper: he now became outrageous, and after calling me pig, devil and<br />

Buonaparte he told me that if I chose I might take away the temple and all the<br />

stones in the Citadel, but that he would never permit me to conjure his soldiers<br />

into my box. When I found that it was in vain to reason with his ignorance, I<br />

changed my tone, and told him that if he did not leave me unmolested, I would<br />

put him into my box, and that he should find it a very difficult matter to get out<br />

agam.<br />

Visibly alarmed, the Disdar immediately retired discomfited, and henceforth carefully<br />

avoided Dodwell and his dangerous box.<br />

Before leaving this chapter we should mention an important improvement respecting<br />

the optics <strong>of</strong> the camera obscura. <strong>The</strong> English optician JOHN DOLLOND in 1758<br />

made public57 a new lens system by means <strong>of</strong> which chromatic aberration was<br />

avoided. A similar invention had actually been made, though not published, by<br />

Chester Moor Hall in 1733. Both his and Dollond's improvements were designed<br />

for the telescope. Zacharias Traber, Rector <strong>of</strong> the Jesuit College in Vienna, in his<br />

Nervus Opticus (1675), credits the Neapolitan Eustachio Divinus with the invention<br />

<strong>of</strong> an achromatic telescope. This had nineteen convex lenses enclosed in a tube 19<br />

cubits long, and being made <strong>of</strong> very fine glass, prevented the discoloration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

image. Dollond combined two lenses <strong>of</strong> different dispersive powers, i.e. one <strong>of</strong> flint<br />

glass and one <strong>of</strong> crown glass, and such achromatic lenses have been employed in<br />

good optical instruments ever since.<br />

WILLIAM HYDE WOLLASTON ' s camera lucida, introduced in 1807,58 is not a camera Pl 14<br />

at all-as is <strong>of</strong>ten mistakenly assumed, perhaps because Fox Talbot at one time drew<br />

with its aid-but a small optical instrument for drawing in broad daylight. By means<br />

<strong>of</strong> a prism, the artist saw a virtual image on his paper which facilitated the delineation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the object or view, but the image was not visible to anyone but the user <strong>of</strong> the<br />

instrument. It will be evident that there is no connection between this instrument<br />

and Dr Hooke's camera lucida already referred to ; and in Wollaston's the name<br />

'camera' was certainly misapplied.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!