08.12.2012 Views

Edited by Moe Meyer - Get a Free Blog

Edited by Moe Meyer - Get a Free Blog

Edited by Moe Meyer - Get a Free Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE CAMP TRACE IN CORPORATE AMERICA 151<br />

Male symbolism was also encoded in their machine-gun taps and their military<br />

drills. The Rockettes were phallic, impersonal women performing tasks normally<br />

associated with the masculine. What happens to our understanding of the<br />

fetishization of the female body when the signifier is a gay man? Fetishism or<br />

transvestism? Or both?<br />

Once the signified is attached to a gay signifier, then the Rockettes can be<br />

understood as trans-transvestites. Gender codes were in this way disrupted as<br />

women became boys in what might be conceptualized as cross-cross-dressing,<br />

that is, women cast as men—complete with phalluses and military moves—yet<br />

devoid of any personality in their veiled womanhood. I suggest that, like<br />

Liberace, the Rockettes were unmarked transvestites. Until today, gay men often<br />

remain closeted in order to secure work, and thus they must mask their object of<br />

desire. Phallic women can then stand for men masquerading as women in<br />

perpetual displacements of sexual identity. The only way gay desire can be<br />

signified within a heterosexual frame is in the guise of heterosexuality itself. Few<br />

scholars writing on fetishism have interrogated the sexual identity of the socalled<br />

“fetishizer” and what effect that would have on signification. I cannot but<br />

read one of Liberace’s reported encounters with Mae West as just this kind of<br />

displacement of identity and desire:<br />

Finally, the big question came. One of the reporters asked, “Miss West,<br />

where are you and Liberace going after this reception?”<br />

She smiled and said, as only she could, “I’m going over to Liberace’s<br />

home to see his gold organ. I’ve seen every other kind, but I’ve never seen<br />

a gold one before.”<br />

…When it was over she did come back to my home and she loved it. As<br />

she walked into one room after another, she kept repeating, “It’s me. It’s me.”<br />

“No,” I said, “It’s me.”<br />

…And for the finish I showed her my gold organ. I not only showed it to<br />

her… I played it for her.<br />

(Liberace 150–151).<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

The disruption of social hierarchies was a common leitmotif running throughout<br />

the Easter Show. Both Liberace and the Rockettes in their own ways served to<br />

disrupt gender codes. And Liberace consistently undermined the construction of<br />

value and taste, particularly in his blending of popular and classical music, but<br />

also in other ways as well. As America’s blue-collar royalty Liberace worked<br />

hard for what he got and, with what he got, he was privileged to hobnob with the<br />

likes of Queen Elizabeth and Baron Hilton, confounding class structures. As a<br />

kitsch Rockefeller, he was a capitalist of exaggerated style and little substance. His<br />

style was his substance, but as Dick Hebdige has shown us style is a form of refusal<br />

(3, passim). With his own philanthropies, foundation, museum, and material

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!