08.12.2012 Views

Edited by Moe Meyer - Get a Free Blog

Edited by Moe Meyer - Get a Free Blog

Edited by Moe Meyer - Get a Free Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NARCISSUS IN THE WILDE 47<br />

meanings and influences throughout the brief text, it is also true that we cannot<br />

avoid the fact that the text remakes these meanings, succinctly inverting the<br />

received morality of the myth <strong>by</strong> turning the gazer into the gazed, the subject into<br />

the object. The received moral of Narcissus typically is related to the dangers of<br />

being attracted to oneself. The moral of “The Disciple,” on the other hand, seems<br />

to relate to the dangers of assuming an ability to know who is attracted to what.<br />

The overt embrace of inversion as a textual principle has been recognized as an<br />

exemplary trait of Wilde’s writings. In “A Few Maxims for the Instruction of the<br />

Over-Educated,” for example, Wilde tells us that “Art is the only serious thing in<br />

the world, and the artist is the only person who is never serious” (1989a: 1203).<br />

In “Phrases and Philosophies for the Use of the Young,” we are told that “The<br />

ages live in history through their anachronisms” (1894:434) This type of<br />

inversion, in which dominant relations between certain terms become flippantly<br />

overturned, seemed to signal something far greater than textual stylistics to<br />

Victorian society. An editorial in the London Evening News written about the<br />

announcement of Wilde’s sodomy conviction berates the writer’s ability to enact<br />

it as a principle of social intercourse:<br />

To him and such as him we owe the spread of moral degeneration amongst<br />

young men with abilities sufficient to make them a credit to their country.<br />

At the feet of Wilde they have learned to gain notoriety <strong>by</strong> blatant conceit,<br />

<strong>by</strong> despising the emotions of healthy humanity and the achievements of<br />

wholesome talent.<br />

(qtd in Hyde 12)<br />

What is clearly at stake here is the association between textual inversion and<br />

sexual inversion, 3 the “new” invention of fin-de-siècle sexology that initiated the<br />

construction of the modern “homosexual.” 4 Jonathan Dollimore has eloquently<br />

summarized this associative pattern:<br />

One of the many reasons why people were terrified <strong>by</strong> Wilde was because<br />

of a perceived connection between his aesthetic transgression and his<br />

sexual transgression. “Inversion” was being used increasingly to define a<br />

specific kind of deviant sexuality inseparable from a deviant personality…<br />

<strong>by</strong> the time of Wilde, homosexuality could be regarded as rooted in a<br />

person’s identity and as pathologically pervading all aspects of his being.<br />

As such the expression of homosexuality might be regarded as the more<br />

intentionally insidious and subversive. Hence in part the animosity and<br />

hysteria directed at Wilde during and after his trial.<br />

(67)<br />

“The Disciple” obviously participates in the prolonged program of inversion that<br />

typifies Wilde’s canon, but it also reinforces the associations between textuality<br />

and sexuality in a number of ways that further support and finesse Dollimore’s

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!