Edited by Moe Meyer - Get a Free Blog
Edited by Moe Meyer - Get a Free Blog
Edited by Moe Meyer - Get a Free Blog
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
NARCISSUS IN THE WILDE 47<br />
meanings and influences throughout the brief text, it is also true that we cannot<br />
avoid the fact that the text remakes these meanings, succinctly inverting the<br />
received morality of the myth <strong>by</strong> turning the gazer into the gazed, the subject into<br />
the object. The received moral of Narcissus typically is related to the dangers of<br />
being attracted to oneself. The moral of “The Disciple,” on the other hand, seems<br />
to relate to the dangers of assuming an ability to know who is attracted to what.<br />
The overt embrace of inversion as a textual principle has been recognized as an<br />
exemplary trait of Wilde’s writings. In “A Few Maxims for the Instruction of the<br />
Over-Educated,” for example, Wilde tells us that “Art is the only serious thing in<br />
the world, and the artist is the only person who is never serious” (1989a: 1203).<br />
In “Phrases and Philosophies for the Use of the Young,” we are told that “The<br />
ages live in history through their anachronisms” (1894:434) This type of<br />
inversion, in which dominant relations between certain terms become flippantly<br />
overturned, seemed to signal something far greater than textual stylistics to<br />
Victorian society. An editorial in the London Evening News written about the<br />
announcement of Wilde’s sodomy conviction berates the writer’s ability to enact<br />
it as a principle of social intercourse:<br />
To him and such as him we owe the spread of moral degeneration amongst<br />
young men with abilities sufficient to make them a credit to their country.<br />
At the feet of Wilde they have learned to gain notoriety <strong>by</strong> blatant conceit,<br />
<strong>by</strong> despising the emotions of healthy humanity and the achievements of<br />
wholesome talent.<br />
(qtd in Hyde 12)<br />
What is clearly at stake here is the association between textual inversion and<br />
sexual inversion, 3 the “new” invention of fin-de-siècle sexology that initiated the<br />
construction of the modern “homosexual.” 4 Jonathan Dollimore has eloquently<br />
summarized this associative pattern:<br />
One of the many reasons why people were terrified <strong>by</strong> Wilde was because<br />
of a perceived connection between his aesthetic transgression and his<br />
sexual transgression. “Inversion” was being used increasingly to define a<br />
specific kind of deviant sexuality inseparable from a deviant personality…<br />
<strong>by</strong> the time of Wilde, homosexuality could be regarded as rooted in a<br />
person’s identity and as pathologically pervading all aspects of his being.<br />
As such the expression of homosexuality might be regarded as the more<br />
intentionally insidious and subversive. Hence in part the animosity and<br />
hysteria directed at Wilde during and after his trial.<br />
(67)<br />
“The Disciple” obviously participates in the prolonged program of inversion that<br />
typifies Wilde’s canon, but it also reinforces the associations between textuality<br />
and sexuality in a number of ways that further support and finesse Dollimore’s