08.12.2012 Views

Edited by Moe Meyer - Get a Free Blog

Edited by Moe Meyer - Get a Free Blog

Edited by Moe Meyer - Get a Free Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

172 TAKING OUT THE TRASH<br />

the process. We need richness, fullness, a sense of life’s possibilities, a sense that<br />

includes the truth of Camp, if we are to create a truly popular radical culture.<br />

NOTES<br />

Portions of this essay appeared earlier as: Kleinhans 1976; and Kleinhans 1979.<br />

A summer fellowship from the Oregon Humanities Center, University of Oregon,<br />

provided time to revise. I would like to thank Sara Blair, Gabriel Gomez, Julia<br />

Lesage, Martha Vicinus, and Tom Waugh for their critical responses.<br />

1 That is, if one is aesthetically receptive to the work to begin with. Which is to say<br />

that the particular and peculiar context of reception is absolutely crucial to<br />

understanding and appreciating Camp, which presents itself initially as a marginal,<br />

outré, and deviant experience, which itself is part of its attraction for its actual<br />

audience.<br />

2 Kuchar, George (dir.). 1975. The Devil’s Cleavage.<br />

3 Ibid.<br />

4 Let’s name names: at the best end, Michel Foucault; at the worst: Philippe Sollers<br />

and Julia Kristeva; with Jean Baudrillard playing the Nutty Professor who bounces<br />

back and forth between these extremes.<br />

BIBLIOGRAPHY<br />

Babuscio, Jack. 1984. “Camp and the Gay Sensibility.” In Richard Dyer (ed.). Gays and<br />

Film. New York: Zoetrope, 40–57.<br />

Barthes, Roland. 1986. “Writers, Intellectuals, Teachers.” The Rustle of Language. Trans.<br />

Richard Howard. New York: Hill and Wang, 309–331.<br />

Cawelti, John. 1976. Adventure, Mystery, and Romance: Formula Stories as Art and<br />

Popular Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.<br />

Dorfles, Gillo. 1970: Kitsch: The World of Bad Taste. New York: Universe Books.<br />

Dyer, Richard. 1977. “It’s Being So Camp as Keeps Us Going.” Body Politic 10: 11–13.<br />

Fassbinder, Rainer Werner. 1972. “Six Films <strong>by</strong> Douglas Sirk.” Trans. Thomas Elsaesser.<br />

In Jon Halliday and Laura Mulvey (eds). Douglas Sirk. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Film<br />

Festival, 95–107.<br />

Feuer, Jane. 1989. “Reading Dynasty: Television and Reception Theory.” South Atlantic<br />

Quarterly 88/2:443–460.<br />

Fiske, John. 1989. Comments at a Northwestern University seminar, Evanston, Illinois,<br />

April.<br />

Greenberg, Clement. 1961. “Avant Garde and Kitsch.” Art and Culture: Critical Essays.<br />

Boston: Beacon Press, 3–21.<br />

Hutcheon, Linda. 1985. A Theory of Parody: The Teachings of Twentieth-Century Art<br />

Forms. New York: Methuen.<br />

Kleinhans, Chuck. 1976. “The Devil’s Cleavage.” Film Quarterly 30/1:62–64.<br />

——1979. “The Actor as Actress: Holly Woodlawn in Trash and Divine in Multiple<br />

Maniacs.” The Actress on Film/Chicago. Chicago: School of the Art Institute of<br />

Chicago, 17–18.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!