14.10.2016 Views

in the 21st Century

hTOE305aYVW

hTOE305aYVW

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

98 Kenya’s F<strong>in</strong>ancial Transformation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>21st</strong> <strong>Century</strong><br />

to capture differences <strong>in</strong> terms of <strong>in</strong>dividuals’ f<strong>in</strong>ancial access, and to relate<br />

<strong>the</strong>se differences to <strong>the</strong> ATM segment that <strong>in</strong>dividuals live closest to.<br />

Columns (3) and (4) report estimates us<strong>in</strong>g as dependent variable transactions<br />

usage i , which <strong>in</strong>dicates whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> respondent currently has a Postbank<br />

account, a current account with a cheque book, a current account for everyday<br />

needs without a cheque book, an ATM/debit card, or a registered mobile<br />

money account. Surpris<strong>in</strong>gly, we do not detect any significant effect of different<br />

ownership of bank branches. Instead, <strong>in</strong>dividuals with a foreign-owned ATM as<br />

<strong>the</strong> closest ATM are more likely to hold one of <strong>the</strong> above-mentioned products<br />

than those liv<strong>in</strong>g close to an ATM owned by a large privately owned bank.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, columns (5) and (6) look at <strong>the</strong> likelihood of <strong>the</strong> respondent hold<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a sav<strong>in</strong>gs product. The results show that <strong>in</strong>dividuals liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> proximity of an<br />

ATM owned by an MFI or a SACCO are more likely to be us<strong>in</strong>g a sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

product than those with a foreign-owned ATM as <strong>the</strong> closest ATM to <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

place of residency.<br />

The f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from Table 7 show that ATMs owned by large privately owned<br />

banks are more likely to be <strong>in</strong> proximity to less f<strong>in</strong>ancially <strong>in</strong>cluded populations<br />

than ATMs of any o<strong>the</strong>r bank segment, although this effect is significant only<br />

when we compare large privately owned banks to foreign-owned banks. In<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r words, large privately owned banks are correlated to a greater extent with<br />

lower levels of f<strong>in</strong>ancial access, of transaction product usage and of sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

product usage than o<strong>the</strong>r bank segments.<br />

While we f<strong>in</strong>d that <strong>the</strong> presence of foreign-owned banks is associated with<br />

higher levels of f<strong>in</strong>ancial access and usage of transaction products, our f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

also show, <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>gly, that ATMs owned by SACCOs and MFIs are positively<br />

correlated with sav<strong>in</strong>gs usage. A potential explanation for this result is that<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividuals liv<strong>in</strong>g closer to MFIs and SACCOs, who are likely to get credit<br />

from <strong>the</strong>se <strong>in</strong>stitutions (as shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 7), are also likely to rely on <strong>the</strong> same<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutions for sav<strong>in</strong>gs purposes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!