14.10.2016 Views

in the 21st Century

hTOE305aYVW

hTOE305aYVW

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Formal F<strong>in</strong>ancial Inclusion <strong>in</strong> Kenya: Understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Demand-Side Constra<strong>in</strong>ts 127<br />

awareness and attitudes towards f<strong>in</strong>ancial products. In analys<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> role of<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancial literacy as a demand-side determ<strong>in</strong>ant, this chapter uses f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

numeracy skills and f<strong>in</strong>ancial product awareness as a proxy for f<strong>in</strong>ancial literacy.<br />

Figure 12: Formal bank access and f<strong>in</strong>ancial numeracy, 2009 and 2013<br />

50<br />

48%<br />

Percent formally banked<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

9%<br />

11%<br />

24%<br />

29%<br />

34%<br />

0<br />

No f<strong>in</strong>ancial numeracy Some f<strong>in</strong>ancial numeracy F<strong>in</strong>ancial numeracy<br />

Source: F<strong>in</strong>Access 2009 and 2013 data.<br />

2009 2013<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ancial numeracy skills affect <strong>the</strong> probability of a person be<strong>in</strong>g formally<br />

banked. From Figure 12 we see that 48% of <strong>the</strong> survey respondents who<br />

answered <strong>the</strong> two numeracy questions correctly <strong>in</strong> 2013 were formally banked,<br />

compared to only 11% of those who got both questions wrong. S<strong>in</strong>ce 2009,<br />

<strong>the</strong> biggest <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> formal bank<strong>in</strong>g has been among those with f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

numeracy skills – an <strong>in</strong>crease of 15 percentage po<strong>in</strong>ts. Among those with little<br />

or no f<strong>in</strong>ancial numeracy skills, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease from 2009 was only 2 percentage<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ts. K<strong>in</strong>g (2012c), build<strong>in</strong>g on Beck and de la Torre (2007), shows how<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancial literacy can change a person’s <strong>in</strong>difference curve such that <strong>the</strong>y have<br />

an <strong>in</strong>creased preference for f<strong>in</strong>ancial services. This may help expla<strong>in</strong> why we see<br />

this <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> percentage banked among those with f<strong>in</strong>ancial numeracy<br />

skills. Claessens’ (2006) analysis of voluntary exclusion also po<strong>in</strong>ts to <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

awareness and understand<strong>in</strong>g result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased demand.<br />

Aga<strong>in</strong>, regardless of <strong>in</strong>come, people with f<strong>in</strong>ancial numeracy skills are more<br />

likely to be banked. This is confirmed by <strong>the</strong> probit regression. Controll<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

everyth<strong>in</strong>g else, answer<strong>in</strong>g one of <strong>the</strong> numeracy questions correctly <strong>in</strong>creases<br />

<strong>the</strong> likelihood of be<strong>in</strong>g banked by 5.3 percentage po<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />

Similarly, when analys<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> relationship between awareness of formal<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancial terms (or 'term<strong>in</strong>ology') and be<strong>in</strong>g formally banked, Figure 13 shows<br />

that <strong>the</strong> greater <strong>the</strong> awareness, <strong>the</strong> more likely a person is to have a formal

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!