28.11.2016 Views

The Joint Force in a Contested and Disordered World

JCS-JOE-2035

JCS-JOE-2035

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section 2 - Contexts of Future Conflict<br />

“Context decodes the orig<strong>in</strong>s, mean<strong>in</strong>g, character, <strong>and</strong> consequences of warfare.” 12<br />

Conflict <strong>and</strong> war <strong>in</strong> 2035 cannot be understood by the simple identification of a set of <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

trends <strong>and</strong> conditions. Instead, the <strong>in</strong>tersection <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>teraction of many discrete trends <strong>and</strong><br />

conditions will ultimately change the character of future conflict <strong>and</strong> illum<strong>in</strong>ate the reasons why<br />

the <strong>Jo<strong>in</strong>t</strong> <strong>Force</strong> may be called on to address threats to U.S. national <strong>in</strong>terests. In fact, conflict <strong>in</strong><br />

2035 is likely to be driven by six specific <strong>and</strong> unique comb<strong>in</strong>ations of trends <strong>and</strong> conditions. 13<br />

Each of these Contexts of Future Conflict creates a troubl<strong>in</strong>g problem space for the <strong>Jo<strong>in</strong>t</strong> <strong>Force</strong>.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />

1. Violent Ideological Competition. Irreconcilable ideas communicated <strong>and</strong> promoted by<br />

identity networks through violence.<br />

2. Threatened U.S. Territory <strong>and</strong> Sovereignty. Encroachment, erosion, or disregard of U.S.<br />

sovereignty <strong>and</strong> the freedom of its citizens from coercion.<br />

3. Antagonistic Geopolitical Balanc<strong>in</strong>g. Increas<strong>in</strong>gly ambitious adversaries maximiz<strong>in</strong>g their<br />

own <strong>in</strong>fluence while actively limit<strong>in</strong>g U.S. <strong>in</strong>fluence.<br />

4. Disrupted Global Commons. Denial or compulsion <strong>in</strong> spaces <strong>and</strong> places available to all but<br />

owned by none.<br />

5. A Contest for Cyberspace. A struggle to def<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> credibly protect sovereignty <strong>in</strong><br />

cyberspace.<br />

6. Shattered <strong>and</strong> Reordered Regions. States unable to cope with <strong>in</strong>ternal political fractures,<br />

environmental stressors, or deliberate external <strong>in</strong>terference.<br />

Each context <strong>in</strong>cludes elements of both contested norms <strong>and</strong> persistent disorder. However, their<br />

relative importance will vary depend<strong>in</strong>g on the objectives of potential adversaries <strong>and</strong> the<br />

capabilities available to them. Dissatisfaction with the current set of <strong>in</strong>ternational rules, norms,<br />

<strong>and</strong> agreements will cause revisionist actors to make their own – <strong>and</strong> attempt to enforce them.<br />

Meanwhile, the loss of legitimacy or strength by govern<strong>in</strong>g authorities will permit other actors to<br />

effectively employ coercion <strong>and</strong> violence <strong>in</strong> pursuit of power or to further their beliefs.<br />

Furthermore, the Contexts of Future Conflict should not be viewed <strong>in</strong> isolation. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Jo<strong>in</strong>t</strong> <strong>Force</strong><br />

will almost certa<strong>in</strong>ly operate with<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> across multiple contexts at any given time. Additionally,<br />

it is likely to encounter escalat<strong>in</strong>g situations characterized by sudden <strong>and</strong> rapid transitions between<br />

contexts. Thus, as a group, the contexts support the development of <strong>in</strong>tegrated operational<br />

approaches to specific military problems – particularly as actual adversaries develop <strong>and</strong> execute<br />

strategies that pose challenges across several contexts.<br />

<strong>The</strong> challenges described with<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> across the Contexts of Future Conflict are not necessarily<br />

preferred nor are they <strong>in</strong>evitable. Through its strategic decisions, the United States will actively,<br />

<strong>and</strong> sometimes <strong>in</strong>advertently, <strong>in</strong>fluence how trends <strong>and</strong> conditions unfold – <strong>and</strong> thus the severity<br />

or probability of conflict <strong>and</strong> war with<strong>in</strong> these contexts. <strong>The</strong>refore, the successful application of<br />

12<br />

Col<strong>in</strong> Gray, Another Bloody Century, (2005), p. 55.<br />

13<br />

This section of JOE 2035 was derived from a <strong>Jo<strong>in</strong>t</strong> Staff J-7 study titled Contexts of Future Conflict:<br />

Opportunities <strong>and</strong> Challenges for the Future <strong>Jo<strong>in</strong>t</strong> <strong>Force</strong> (September 2015).<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!