Report - Social Watch Philippines
Report - Social Watch Philippines
Report - Social Watch Philippines
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
elationship between plants and pollinators that may<br />
affect the survival of plant species. Most vulnerable are<br />
those species that have diffi culties in migrating as a form<br />
of survival. Further increase in temperature to 50 o C or<br />
60 o C may cause a number of animals and plant species<br />
to die out and become extinct while critical habitats<br />
may be lost. Many research studies claim that coastal<br />
ecosystems have higher vulnerability to climate change<br />
compared to terrestrial ecosystems.<br />
On the other hand, sea level rise of one meter is<br />
predicted to inundate many coastal towns and cities in<br />
the <strong>Philippines</strong> while practically submerging many small<br />
islands (defi ned as those with areas of less than 1,000<br />
hectares) especially during high tides. Sea level rise will<br />
also affect sea grass beds and mangroves and cause saline<br />
intrusion into groundwater, lakes and rivers.<br />
Acidifi cation of coastal waters due to increased<br />
carbon dioxide threatens the survival of plankton at<br />
the base of the food chain and then the productivity<br />
of fi sheries.<br />
A baseline for the new millennium 9<br />
1990 is the reference year for the MDGs and other international<br />
agreements like the Agenda 21, the UN Framework<br />
Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the<br />
UN Framework Convention on Biodiversity (UNCBD),<br />
and the UN Convention to Combat Desertifi cation and<br />
Land Degradation (UNCCD). The UNFCCC baseline<br />
covers the greenhouse gas emissions inventory obtained<br />
from national communications (NatComs or NCs) and<br />
assessment of vulnerability and adaptation. The climate<br />
convention’s scientifi c body, the Interagency Panel on<br />
Climate Change (IPCC) makes the regular assessments<br />
reports (ARs). The fourth and last assessment report in<br />
2007, which made headlines and won the IPCC a Nobel<br />
Prize, gave a more defi nitive conclusion about human<br />
responsibility for global warming (GW) and consequent<br />
destabilization of the climate system.<br />
Succeeding reviews and assessments provide updated<br />
baselines.<br />
One of these was the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment<br />
9 (MA), carried out under the auspices of the<br />
UN between 2001 and 2005. The MA aimed to assess<br />
the consequences of ecosystem change for human wellbeing<br />
and set a baseline for needed actions for enhancing<br />
the conservation and sustainable use of ecosystems<br />
and their contribution to human well-being.<br />
12 SOCIAL WATCH PHILIPPINES<br />
The MA, which involved around 1,360 experts<br />
from 95 countries, was a multilateral response to the<br />
request for science-based information by state parties to<br />
the four international conventions—the UNCBD, the<br />
UNCCD, the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, and<br />
the Convention on Migratory Species. It also responded<br />
to needs expressed by the business community, NGOs,<br />
health sector, and Indigenous Peoples.<br />
The MA focused on ecosystem services, defi ned as<br />
benefi ts people obtain from ecosystems. An ecosystem<br />
is a dynamic complex of plant, animal, and microorganism<br />
communities and the non-living environment<br />
interacting as a functional unit. These include provisioning<br />
services such as food, water, timber, and fi ber;<br />
regulating services that affect climate, fl oods, disease,<br />
wastes, and water quality; cultural services that that<br />
provide recreational, aesthetic, and spiritual benefi ts;<br />
and supporting services such as soil formation, photosynthesis,<br />
and nutrient cycling.<br />
Human well-being includes security, basic material<br />
for a good life, health, good social relations, and<br />
freedom of choice and action.<br />
The MA has come up with four main fi ndings.<br />
One, over the past 50 years humans have changed<br />
ecosystems more rapidly and extensively than in any<br />
comparable period of time in human history, largely<br />
to meet rapidly growing demands for food, fresh<br />
water, timber, fi ber, and fuel. This has resulted in a<br />
substantial and largely irreversible loss in biodiversity<br />
of life on Earth.<br />
Two, the changes have contributed to human<br />
well-being for the present generation. But the growing<br />
costs in terms of the degradation of many ecosystem<br />
services, increased risks, and worsening of poverty for<br />
some groups of people will put at risk the well-being<br />
of future generations.<br />
Three, the degradation of ecosystem services could<br />
grow signifi cantly worse during the fi rst half of this<br />
century and is a barrier to achieving the Millennium<br />
Development Goals.<br />
Four, the challenge of reversing the degradation of<br />
ecosystems, while meeting increasing demands for their<br />
services, can be partially met under some scenarios that<br />
the MA has considered. But this assumes signifi cant<br />
changes in governance.<br />
These fi ndings confi rm what many believed was<br />
already happening. Together, the MA and the IPCC<br />
9 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing Synthesis. Island Press 2005 World Resources Institute.