Report - Social Watch Philippines
Report - Social Watch Philippines
Report - Social Watch Philippines
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
In the world’s tropical regions, Asia and the Pacifi c<br />
show the highest rate of deforestation, the fastest rate of<br />
commercial logging and the highest rate of fuel wood<br />
removal. The major causes of forest cover loss are attributed<br />
to the expansion of farming, large economic<br />
development programs involving resettlement, agriculture,<br />
and infrastructure. Add to this overharvesting for<br />
industrial use and fuel wood, pollution and extreme<br />
climate events like storms.<br />
Asia and the Pacifi c has been losing its water resources<br />
fast due to ever rising demands of its growing<br />
population, agriculture, industry, and homes. Water for<br />
irrigation accounts for the largest withdrawal from both<br />
surface and ground water sources. Excessive abstraction<br />
of groundwater has been depleting aquifers, lowering<br />
water tables, and inducing sea water and salt intrusion.<br />
Degradation through pollution of river systems, lakes,<br />
wetlands and marshes have aggravated over extraction.<br />
The coastal and marine environments of Asia and<br />
the Pacifi c are being stressed by ever growing demands<br />
for fi sh and marine resources, for expansion of industry,<br />
tourism and human settlements. Open access to these<br />
supposedly common property resources is rapidly<br />
transforming the region’s coasts and seas into a classic<br />
tragedy of the commons.<br />
Asia and the Pacifi c is losing its biodiversity fast.<br />
Though the region is still the home of seven of the<br />
18 mega-diversity nations (Australia, China, India,<br />
Indonesia, Malaysia, the <strong>Philippines</strong>, and Papua New<br />
Guinea) its plant and animal species are being destroyed<br />
at a rate that threatens extinction. The obvious causes<br />
are clear cutting of forests and mangroves, diminishing<br />
agro-biodiversity, destruction of corals, and over-fi shing.<br />
Not as obvious are the impacts of biotechnology,<br />
genetic modifi cation and mono-culture.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The chances of our country achieving its MDG<br />
commitments by 2015 are high, mainly because we<br />
are favored by a stable political environment. The new<br />
regime has come to power in a smooth transition and<br />
enjoys a high level of trust across the whole nation.<br />
Very few regimes had such fortune. In contrast, its immediate<br />
predecessor was born of turbulence, governed<br />
in turbulence, and left with many outstanding issues<br />
demanding urgent closure.<br />
But our advantage in political stability stands on<br />
vulnerable grounds. The problems left behind by the<br />
previous PGMA regime are many and the solutions<br />
14 SOCIAL WATCH PHILIPPINES<br />
not easy. There are more poor Filipinos now than<br />
when we started on the MDGs. The damage caused<br />
by natural disasters in 2009 threw us back to a baseline<br />
of reconstruction.<br />
The country is so vulnerable to the impacts of<br />
climate change and variability. Our adaptive capacity is<br />
at a low level, considering the poverty situation and our<br />
country’s geography. The resilience of our communities<br />
and our natural environments has yet to be tested<br />
against the worst-case climate change scenarios.<br />
We are also confronted with increasing uncertainties<br />
within the Asian region and worldwide. China is<br />
the leading success story of the MDGs without which<br />
there would be little or no reduction at all in global<br />
poverty. There is much to learn about how it achieved<br />
a high level of prosperity with universal social protection.<br />
However, the China model is not only hard to<br />
replicate, its claim to success has come about at great<br />
costs to the environment.<br />
Not everything is lost despite our failure to bring the<br />
MDG progress up to a high probability level of achievement<br />
with only fi ve years remaining. It simply means that<br />
the new regime has a lot of catching up to do.<br />
The MDGs is not an impossible dream, just a set<br />
of minimum goals.<br />
References<br />
Brown, L. R, 2001. Eco-Economy: Building an Economy for the<br />
Earth. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.<br />
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) 2010.<br />
The Philippine Strategy on Climate Change Adaptation 2010-<br />
2022.<br />
Jacobs, Michael, 1991. The Green Economy: environment, sustainable<br />
development and the politics of the future London: Pluto<br />
Press.<br />
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human<br />
Wellbeing Synthesis. Island Press. World Resources Institute.<br />
Pearce, D.W., Markandya, A. and Barbier, E.B. 1989. Blueprint for a<br />
Green Economy. London: Earthscan.<br />
Serrano, I. R. 1994. Pay Now, Not Later: essays on the environment<br />
and development. Philippine Rural Reconstruction Movement<br />
(PRRM).<br />
Stern, N., 7 December 2009. Business must champion low-carbon<br />
growth. Financial Times. p.13.<br />
The <strong>Philippines</strong> Fourth Progress <strong>Report</strong> on the MDGs, Third Draft,<br />
07/12/2010.<br />
Typhoons Ondoy and Pepeng: Post Disaster Needs Assessment<br />
(PDNA), November 26, 2009.<br />
United Nations. 2009. Global MDG <strong>Report</strong>.<br />
UNESCAP, 2005. State of the Environment in the Asia and the<br />
Pacifi c 2005 report.<br />
UNFCCC COP15, December 2010. Copenhagen Accord.<br />
UN Millennium Campaign (UNMC) and Global Call to Action Against<br />
Poverty (GCAP). ‘Making poverty history’ Banner slogan.<br />
WB-NDCC, 2008. Estimated Damage of Disasters.<br />
World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland<br />
Commission). 1987. Our Common Future. <strong>Report</strong> to the UN.