11.12.2012 Views

Report - Social Watch Philippines

Report - Social Watch Philippines

Report - Social Watch Philippines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Box 2. Education budget tracking (2008-2009)<br />

The DepEd is the biggest government agency, employing<br />

over half a million teachers and non- teaching<br />

personnel and serving more than 20 million students.<br />

Every year, billions of pesos worth of inputs and services<br />

are procured such as textbooks, armchairs, teaching materials<br />

and food, and the construction of school buildings<br />

and even the hiring of consultants for various projects.<br />

Being a centralized bureaucracy faced with immense<br />

work, the DepEd has diffi culty in ensuring effi cient use<br />

of resources and quality of services. Ineffi ciencies and<br />

wastages were observed in the budget tracking initiative<br />

undertaken by E-Net <strong>Philippines</strong> jointly with <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Watch</strong><br />

<strong>Philippines</strong>.<br />

A case in point is in teacher hiring. While the government<br />

devotes funds for additional teachers to lower the<br />

pupil-teacher ratio, delays in the hiring of new teachers are<br />

usual. Based on the budget tracking, teachers were hired<br />

only towards the end of the year. The school administrators<br />

explained that this was due to the long 11-step process<br />

in hiring teachers. Sometimes, the delay in the hiring was<br />

done deliberately to generate savings from the unspent<br />

salaries of teachers yet to be hired. These savings could<br />

then be used to augment teachers’ end-of-year bonuses.<br />

Similarly, the DepEd has been questioned in the past<br />

years for controversial procurements of textbooks. One<br />

alleged irregularity involved the purchase of erroneous<br />

textbooks for Filipino and <strong>Social</strong> Studies for grades 1-5,<br />

which was part of the 12 million textbooks purchased with<br />

funds from the World Bank.<br />

References<br />

ADB Statistical Data Base System & IMF Government Finance.<br />

January 2008.<br />

ASPBAE (Asia South Pacifi c Association for Basic and Adult Education).<br />

2007. Mapping Out Disadvantaged Groups in Education.<br />

Education <strong>Watch</strong> <strong>Report</strong>s, <strong>Philippines</strong> summary report.<br />

Dakar Framework for Action. 2000. Education for All: Meeting<br />

our Collective Commitments. Adopted by the World Education<br />

Forum. Dakar, Senegal, 26-28 April. http://www.unesco.<br />

org/education/wef/en-conf/dakframeng.shtm.<br />

Delors, J., In’am, A. M., Amagi, I., et al. 1996. Learning: The<br />

Treasure Within. <strong>Report</strong> to UNESCO of the International Commission<br />

on Education for the Twenty-First Century. Paris. www.<br />

unesco.org/delors/.<br />

DepEd (Department of Education). Factsheet, Basic Education<br />

Statistics (School Years 1990/1991 – 2007/2008).<br />

IDMC. October 2009. Cycle of confl ict and neglect. Mindanao’s<br />

displacement and protection crisis. Internal Displacement<br />

Monitoring Centre, Norwegian Refugee Council. www.internaldisplacement.org<br />

Manasan, R. G. 2007. Financing the Millennium Development<br />

Goals: The <strong>Philippines</strong> (Final <strong>Report</strong>). United Nations Development<br />

Programme.<br />

NSCB – Child Development Index www.nscb.gov.ph<br />

National Statistics Offi ce and ORC Macro. 2004. National Demographic<br />

and Health Survey 2003. Calverton, Maryland.<br />

National Statistics Offi ce and ICF Macro. 2009. National Demographic<br />

and Health Survey 2008. Calverton, Maryland.<br />

52 SOCIAL WATCH PHILIPPINES<br />

The food for school program is another case of a<br />

wasted initiative that had a large fund allocation but was<br />

poorly conceptualized and badly implemented with many<br />

irregularities, thus, rendering the project ineffective. School<br />

nutritionists doubted the effectiveness of the program given<br />

the short duration of implementation, irregular rice delivery<br />

schedules and the limited quantity of rice distributed to the<br />

pupils. In several cases, rice deliveries occurred late in the<br />

school year when pupils had already dropped out of school.<br />

The impact of the program in terms of improving nutrition<br />

and pupil performance and in reducing drop-out rates is<br />

questionable particularly because of the absence of a monitoring<br />

system. These noted weaknesses of the program led<br />

the new administration to cancel the program, but only after<br />

wasting several billions in much needed resources.<br />

The School Based Management (SBM) grant aims<br />

to support efforts of schools and divisions towards<br />

improvement as part of the decentralization efforts and<br />

school empowerment process. However, delays in the<br />

release of funds from the SBM grant amounting to a<br />

total of Php 500 million were also monitored by E-Net.<br />

For example, the SBM funds for 2007 were released<br />

only in the last week of December 2007. Considering<br />

the processes involved, paper requirements in government<br />

purchasing and the corresponding time needed<br />

in disbursing funds, all these made utilization of the<br />

SBM within the fi scal year very diffi cult. Problems in the<br />

management funds are threatening the implementation<br />

of the plan to empower schools.<br />

These are but a few examples that refl ect ineffi ciencies<br />

and the poor governance of the education in the country.<br />

NSO, LCC, and DepEd. 2005. 2003 Functional Literacy,<br />

Education and Mass Media Survey (FLEMMS) Final <strong>Report</strong>.<br />

Manila.<br />

“<strong>Philippines</strong> Fourth Progress <strong>Report</strong> on the Millennium Development<br />

Goals (MDGs).” Third Draft, July 2010 (n.p.)<br />

Raya, R. 2010. “Investing in the Out-of-School.” Philippine Institutions:<br />

growth and Prosperity for All. Sta. Ana III, Filomeno (Ed.).<br />

Action for Economic Reforms. Quezon City.<br />

Republic of the <strong>Philippines</strong>. 2009. Republic Act No. 9524, General<br />

Appropriations Act Fiscal Year 2009. http://www.dbm.gov.<br />

ph/index.php?pid=8&xid=28&id=989.<br />

Republic of the <strong>Philippines</strong>. 2008. Republic Act No. 9498, General<br />

Appropriations Act Fiscal Year 2008. http://www.dbm.gov.<br />

ph/index.php?pid=8&xid=28&id=461<br />

Republic of the <strong>Philippines</strong>. 2007. Republic Act No. 9401, General<br />

Appropriations Act Fiscal Year 2007.http://www.dbm.gov.<br />

ph/index.php?pid=8&xid=28&id=38&page=<br />

Republic of the <strong>Philippines</strong>. 2005. Republic Act No. 9336, General<br />

Appropriations Act Fiscal Year 2005.http://www.dbm.gov.<br />

ph/index.php?pid=8&xid=28&id=39&page=<br />

UNESCO. 2007. EFA Global Monitoring <strong>Report</strong> 2008. Education for<br />

All by 2015: Will We Make It? Paris.<br />

UNESCO. 2008. EFA Global Monitoring <strong>Report</strong> 2009. Overcoming<br />

Inequality: Why Governance Matters. Paris.<br />

UNESCO. 2009. EFA Global Monitoring <strong>Report</strong> 2010. Reaching the<br />

marginalized. Paris.<br />

UNESCO and UNICEF. 2005. Children Out of School, Measuring<br />

Exclusion from Primary Education. Montreal: UNESCO Institute<br />

for Statistics.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!