03.04.2017 Views

Diversity

2oskrKE

2oskrKE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Tax<br />

59<br />

entrepreneurial and favouring higher<br />

self-employed earners at the expense<br />

of low-middle income earners<br />

etc. Following pressure from the<br />

press and their own backbenchers,<br />

the Government subsequently<br />

announced on 15 March that it would<br />

not proceed with the NIC changes. As<br />

a result, the only substantive change<br />

from a tax-raising perspective<br />

announced in the March 2017 Budget<br />

is the reduction in the Dividend<br />

Allowance from April 2018 to £2,000.<br />

So, was there merit to the<br />

Chancellor’s argument that the selfemployed<br />

are not paying their fair<br />

share of tax? If we take an example<br />

of a self-employed individual with<br />

profits of £45,000 per annum and<br />

compare this against an individual<br />

who runs a company and also makes<br />

a profit of £45,000 but extracts the<br />

profits by mixture of salary and<br />

dividend in the most tax-efficient<br />

manner (but sufficient to give him<br />

a national insurance record), the<br />

results are quite revealing. Based<br />

upon the proposed changes to the<br />

dividend allowance, but keeping<br />

all other rates and allowances the<br />

same (which includes ignoring<br />

the potential introduction of the<br />

Northern Ireland corporate tax rate<br />

from April 2018), the results are as<br />

outlined in Table 1 above.<br />

This table shows that it is possible<br />

for self-employed individuals to pay<br />

less tax by being employed through<br />

their own companies and extracting<br />

funds in a tax-efficient manner.<br />

They are, meanwhile, entitled to<br />

the full range of benefits to which<br />

employees are entitled, although the<br />

reduction in the Dividend Allowance<br />

will reduce the differential from<br />

next year. The example ignores<br />

other issues around deductibility<br />

of expenses and costs of being<br />

Tax Year 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20<br />

Self employed<br />

Profits<br />

Income tax<br />

National insurance<br />

- Class II<br />

-Class IV<br />

Net income after tax<br />

Company owner<br />

Profits<br />

Salary<br />

Profit before Tax<br />

Corporation Tax<br />

Profit after Tax<br />

Dividend<br />

Retained Reserves<br />

Salary<br />

Dividend<br />

Income Tax<br />

National Insurance<br />

Net income after tax<br />

45,000<br />

(6,700)<br />

(148)<br />

(3,315)<br />

34,837<br />

45,000<br />

(8,164)<br />

36,836<br />

(6,999)<br />

29,837<br />

(29,837)<br />

Nil<br />

8,164<br />

29,837<br />

(1,613)<br />

-<br />

36,388<br />

incorporated, but it clearly destroys<br />

the myth that individuals set up as<br />

self-employed solely to pay less tax.<br />

So what is the Chancellor going<br />

to announce in his Autumn Budget<br />

to replace the additional £2.2<br />

billion of Class IV NIC revenue no<br />

longer coming his way next year?<br />

Any proposed tax-raising policy<br />

will now be first cross-referenced<br />

with the Conservative Election<br />

Manifesto to make sure it passes<br />

that test. That means no increases<br />

in the headline rates of income<br />

tax, national insurance and VAT.<br />

This will inevitably lead to further<br />

tinkering of the tax system and more<br />

complexity as the Chancellor finds<br />

a way to tinker with various reliefs<br />

and allowances. Future changes<br />

45,000<br />

(6,700)<br />

-<br />

(3,315)<br />

34,985<br />

45,000<br />

(8,164)<br />

36,836<br />

(6,999)<br />

29,837<br />

(29,837)<br />

Nil<br />

8,164<br />

29,837<br />

(1,838)<br />

-<br />

36,163<br />

could include a further reduction<br />

in (or removal of) the Dividend<br />

Allowance, which received very<br />

little negative press, despite raising<br />

more tax than the proposed national<br />

insurance tax rises; a change in the<br />

dividend tax rate; and higher rate<br />

tax relief restrictions for pension<br />

contributions. As ever, the Chancellor<br />

of the day will have to walk the<br />

tightrope between balancing the<br />

books and maintaining political<br />

credibility and popularity. The loser<br />

in all this will most likely be tax<br />

simplification.<br />

SEAN LAVERY<br />

Sean Lavery FCA is Tax Partner<br />

at BDO Northern Ireland.<br />

45,000<br />

(6,700)<br />

-<br />

(3,315)<br />

34,985<br />

45,000<br />

(8,164)<br />

36,836<br />

(6,999)<br />

29,837<br />

(29,837)<br />

Nil<br />

8,164<br />

29,837<br />

(1,838)<br />

-<br />

36,163<br />

Additional tax paid<br />

by self-employed<br />

worker 1,551 1,178 1,178<br />

www.accountancyireland.ie

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!