Diversity
2oskrKE
2oskrKE
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Tax<br />
59<br />
entrepreneurial and favouring higher<br />
self-employed earners at the expense<br />
of low-middle income earners<br />
etc. Following pressure from the<br />
press and their own backbenchers,<br />
the Government subsequently<br />
announced on 15 March that it would<br />
not proceed with the NIC changes. As<br />
a result, the only substantive change<br />
from a tax-raising perspective<br />
announced in the March 2017 Budget<br />
is the reduction in the Dividend<br />
Allowance from April 2018 to £2,000.<br />
So, was there merit to the<br />
Chancellor’s argument that the selfemployed<br />
are not paying their fair<br />
share of tax? If we take an example<br />
of a self-employed individual with<br />
profits of £45,000 per annum and<br />
compare this against an individual<br />
who runs a company and also makes<br />
a profit of £45,000 but extracts the<br />
profits by mixture of salary and<br />
dividend in the most tax-efficient<br />
manner (but sufficient to give him<br />
a national insurance record), the<br />
results are quite revealing. Based<br />
upon the proposed changes to the<br />
dividend allowance, but keeping<br />
all other rates and allowances the<br />
same (which includes ignoring<br />
the potential introduction of the<br />
Northern Ireland corporate tax rate<br />
from April 2018), the results are as<br />
outlined in Table 1 above.<br />
This table shows that it is possible<br />
for self-employed individuals to pay<br />
less tax by being employed through<br />
their own companies and extracting<br />
funds in a tax-efficient manner.<br />
They are, meanwhile, entitled to<br />
the full range of benefits to which<br />
employees are entitled, although the<br />
reduction in the Dividend Allowance<br />
will reduce the differential from<br />
next year. The example ignores<br />
other issues around deductibility<br />
of expenses and costs of being<br />
Tax Year 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20<br />
Self employed<br />
Profits<br />
Income tax<br />
National insurance<br />
- Class II<br />
-Class IV<br />
Net income after tax<br />
Company owner<br />
Profits<br />
Salary<br />
Profit before Tax<br />
Corporation Tax<br />
Profit after Tax<br />
Dividend<br />
Retained Reserves<br />
Salary<br />
Dividend<br />
Income Tax<br />
National Insurance<br />
Net income after tax<br />
45,000<br />
(6,700)<br />
(148)<br />
(3,315)<br />
34,837<br />
45,000<br />
(8,164)<br />
36,836<br />
(6,999)<br />
29,837<br />
(29,837)<br />
Nil<br />
8,164<br />
29,837<br />
(1,613)<br />
-<br />
36,388<br />
incorporated, but it clearly destroys<br />
the myth that individuals set up as<br />
self-employed solely to pay less tax.<br />
So what is the Chancellor going<br />
to announce in his Autumn Budget<br />
to replace the additional £2.2<br />
billion of Class IV NIC revenue no<br />
longer coming his way next year?<br />
Any proposed tax-raising policy<br />
will now be first cross-referenced<br />
with the Conservative Election<br />
Manifesto to make sure it passes<br />
that test. That means no increases<br />
in the headline rates of income<br />
tax, national insurance and VAT.<br />
This will inevitably lead to further<br />
tinkering of the tax system and more<br />
complexity as the Chancellor finds<br />
a way to tinker with various reliefs<br />
and allowances. Future changes<br />
45,000<br />
(6,700)<br />
-<br />
(3,315)<br />
34,985<br />
45,000<br />
(8,164)<br />
36,836<br />
(6,999)<br />
29,837<br />
(29,837)<br />
Nil<br />
8,164<br />
29,837<br />
(1,838)<br />
-<br />
36,163<br />
could include a further reduction<br />
in (or removal of) the Dividend<br />
Allowance, which received very<br />
little negative press, despite raising<br />
more tax than the proposed national<br />
insurance tax rises; a change in the<br />
dividend tax rate; and higher rate<br />
tax relief restrictions for pension<br />
contributions. As ever, the Chancellor<br />
of the day will have to walk the<br />
tightrope between balancing the<br />
books and maintaining political<br />
credibility and popularity. The loser<br />
in all this will most likely be tax<br />
simplification.<br />
SEAN LAVERY<br />
Sean Lavery FCA is Tax Partner<br />
at BDO Northern Ireland.<br />
45,000<br />
(6,700)<br />
-<br />
(3,315)<br />
34,985<br />
45,000<br />
(8,164)<br />
36,836<br />
(6,999)<br />
29,837<br />
(29,837)<br />
Nil<br />
8,164<br />
29,837<br />
(1,838)<br />
-<br />
36,163<br />
Additional tax paid<br />
by self-employed<br />
worker 1,551 1,178 1,178<br />
www.accountancyireland.ie