12.12.2012 Views

Selected papers~ SPECIAL EDITION - Index of

Selected papers~ SPECIAL EDITION - Index of

Selected papers~ SPECIAL EDITION - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

change)<br />

Terms <strong>of</strong> trade<br />

(percentage<br />

change)<br />

Nominal GDP<br />

(in mil. lei)<br />

Nominal GDP<br />

(in mil. Euro)<br />

2008 2009 2010<br />

Est.<br />

2011<br />

Project.<br />

21<br />

2012<br />

Project<br />

2013<br />

Project.<br />

2014<br />

Project.<br />

2015<br />

Project.<br />

2016<br />

Project.<br />

2.8 -0.4 -1.8 -0.7 0.6 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.1<br />

514,700 498,008 513,641 542,035 590,247 643,816 703,827 770,546 843,680<br />

139,666 117,558 122,062 127,237 140,658 156,307 174.317 194.107 216.339<br />

Source: Estimates and projects <strong>of</strong> the Romanian authorities and the IMF staff.<br />

1/ Real fiscal balance adjusted for the automatic effects <strong>of</strong> the internal imbalances (output gap) and external<br />

imbalances (absorption gap) in the fiscal position.<br />

The analysis <strong>of</strong> data on the economic and financial indicators in Table 2.1 highlights some<br />

challenging issues <strong>of</strong> major significance.<br />

It is that economic growth in Romania has gone from relatively high values in 2008, to sudden<br />

and major slumps in 2009 and 2010, the real GDP moving from a growth <strong>of</strong> 7.3% to decreases<br />

<strong>of</strong> -7.1% and, respectively,-1.3% for 2011, the forecast having been 1.5%.<br />

These large and sudden changes in amplitude indicators show a case <strong>of</strong> strong shock that<br />

Romania went through, with severe enough consequences on short, medium and long term.<br />

From these shock cases we should draw lessons in the sense that the way economic decline<br />

occurs is important as well and one must always be prepared. Statements <strong>of</strong> decision makers in<br />

Romania in September 2008, that the international financial crisis "will not have direct<br />

effects" on the Romanian economy, showed how far they were from the truth:<br />

- Projections for the years 2012-2016 show rather relatively equal annual developments, which<br />

<strong>of</strong> course is only a desirable perception <strong>of</strong> quite variable future developments;<br />

- External debt as weight in GDP increased from 51.4% in 2008 to 78.9% in 2011, and in the<br />

next four years until 2016 it should stay at a high level, although with a downward trend,<br />

without reaching the level <strong>of</strong> 2008, which means that the decline triggered by the crisis, in<br />

some cases, will not have been recovered even by 2016;<br />

- Inflation is at relatively high rates in 2008-2010 and then stays quasi-constant at an annual<br />

level <strong>of</strong> 3% which by far cannot be considered as a convenient (comfortable) one;<br />

- The ICOR (incremental capital - output ratio) shows a decrease <strong>of</strong> expected economic<br />

performance and efficiency which is contrary to the sustainability <strong>of</strong> external debt and the<br />

ability to meet external debt service. Added to this is the continuation <strong>of</strong> chronicization <strong>of</strong> the<br />

deficits <strong>of</strong> the trade, services and income balances, during 2011-2016;<br />

- The gross international reserves are expected to increase to 47.3 billion euros as compared to<br />

36 billion euros in 2010. The sources <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> such reserves if they consist <strong>of</strong> new<br />

borrowings are not a factor <strong>of</strong> the strengthening <strong>of</strong> sustainability.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!