Illiquid assets
Unwrapping alternative returns Global Investor, 01/2015 Credit Suisse
Unwrapping alternative returns
Global Investor, 01/2015
Credit Suisse
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
GLOBAL INVESTOR 1.15 — 45<br />
Hints for investors<br />
1 / Adopt a long investment<br />
horizon. Transaction costs<br />
are best absorbed by having a<br />
long investment horizon.<br />
2 / Mind the leverage. Sufficient<br />
own funds help to avoid<br />
fire sales as price and liquidity<br />
cycles can be long.<br />
3 / Know your product.<br />
Legis lation is very different for<br />
distinct types of real estate<br />
funds and country-dependent.<br />
Some setups are more<br />
exposed to liquidity problems.<br />
4 / Take your time. Avoid<br />
making your decision to buy<br />
or sell too quickly. This could<br />
turn out to be very costly.<br />
5 / Add real estate to your<br />
port folio. Do not be frightened<br />
of illiquidity. Real estate is<br />
a good diversifier in portfolios.<br />
01_Allocation to property in<br />
UHNWI investment portfolios<br />
While residential property (main residence and<br />
any second homes) makes up almost 30% of<br />
the total net worth of UHNWIs, real estate also<br />
plays an important role when it comes to making<br />
investments. On average, property accounts<br />
for 24% of UHNWI investment portfolios.<br />
In over 40% of all cases, this share has even<br />
increased in recent years.<br />
Source: Knight Frank, The Wealth Report 2014<br />
in percent<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
Australasia<br />
Asia<br />
Russia/CIS<br />
Africa<br />
Global<br />
Europe<br />
Middle East<br />
North America<br />
Latin America<br />
When talking about illiquid <strong>assets</strong>,<br />
real estate is at the forefront as<br />
it belongs to the most prominent<br />
of illiquid <strong>assets</strong>. In developed<br />
markets, real estate is the most important<br />
wealth contributor in household portfolios and<br />
adds up to enormous amounts of wealth. It is<br />
not surprising that regulators and central<br />
banks pay a lot of attention to real estate<br />
markets. Residential real estate accounts<br />
for almost 30% of net worth in portfolios of<br />
ultrahigh-net-worth individuals (UHNWIs) (see<br />
Figure 1), and pension funds also have a substantial<br />
share of their allocation in real estate<br />
(see Figure 2).<br />
Causes of illiquidity of real estate <strong>assets</strong><br />
The illiquidity feature of real estate results<br />
from a combination of several characteristics.<br />
To begin with, real estate <strong>assets</strong> are always<br />
tied to a certain location. The combination of<br />
a particular location and a specific object<br />
quality creates a unique tangible asset. Consequently,<br />
every building requires a one-off<br />
analysis and, on a microlevel, prices can even<br />
differ heavily on the basis of, for example,<br />
exposure to noise or view. All this is reflected<br />
in the valuation of a property: there is no true<br />
02_Asset allocation of<br />
Swiss pension funds as<br />
of September 2014<br />
Swiss pension funds traditionally have a substantial<br />
allocation to real estate. As of September<br />
2014, almost 20% of their funds were invested<br />
in real estate. This number typically decreases to<br />
some degree when equity markets are doing<br />
particularly well and therefore make up a larger<br />
part of the asset allocation.<br />
Source: Credit Suisse Swiss Pension Fund Index, Q3 2014<br />
2.1%<br />
19.7%<br />
4.9%<br />
31.3%<br />
Liquidity Bonds Equities<br />
Alternative investments Real estate<br />
Mortgages Rest<br />
1.2%<br />
7.0%<br />
33.7%<br />
or objective price. Target prices depend on the<br />
type of valuation model used and on investorspecific<br />
preferences. Finding a price becomes<br />
even more difficult when there is only limited<br />
data available on similar transactions and if<br />
<strong>assets</strong> have rare characteristics. This often<br />
makes price negotiations time-consuming, and<br />
adds to illiquidity. Determining a fair price is<br />
especially important when one considers the<br />
large size of the transaction.<br />
Several other real estate characteristics<br />
contribute to illiquidity, mostly from a cost<br />
perspective. For example, the design and, to<br />
some degree, the location of a building predetermine<br />
its suitability for certain activities.<br />
The conversion of a big department store<br />
into many small retail units is relatively costly,<br />
and regulation must also be taken into account.<br />
Changing the use of a property from<br />
a legal point of view, such as the conversion<br />
of apartments into shops and vice versa, may<br />
be difficult or even impossible. Investors must<br />
bear this in mind and should therefore have a<br />
clear strategy when investing in real estate.<br />
Other costs include legal expenses and taxes<br />
at the transaction stage. In total, there are<br />
five steps in the acquisition of a commercial<br />
building (see Figure 3). At each step, different<br />
types of costs occur. Purchasing a commercial<br />
real estate building typically needs a<br />
negotiation time of about three months, plus<br />
several months to conclude the transaction.<br />
One last reason for the illiquidity of real estate<br />
is simply the state of the market, which can<br />
dry up quickly in periods of excess demand<br />
(when nobody wants to sell a property) or,<br />
more seriously, in a situation of weak demand.<br />
Investors are facing difficult decisions<br />
The main question for investors is whether it<br />
is worth accepting this disadvantage from<br />
a risk-return perspective. This depends on<br />
the time horizon. As high transaction costs<br />
associated with illiquidity are fixed costs,<br />
it makes sense to hold such an asset for a<br />
longer period. Therefore, pension funds and<br />
other institutional or private investors with<br />
a long time horizon are typical real estate investors.<br />
In addition, these investors need to<br />
accept that their real estate positions may not<br />
be 100% liquid at any time. For wealthy investors,<br />
these constraints are easier to cope with<br />
(a fact that is reflected in the higher real estate<br />
allocations of UHNWIs, see Figure 1). For<br />
these investors, it makes sense to accept the<br />
illiquidity and be compensated for it. For example,<br />
the historical average premium to the<br />
intrinsic net asset value (NAV) for listed >