10.08.2017 Views

Illiquid assets

Unwrapping alternative returns Global Investor, 01/2015 Credit Suisse

Unwrapping alternative returns
Global Investor, 01/2015
Credit Suisse

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GLOBAL INVESTOR 1.15 — 45<br />

Hints for investors<br />

1 / Adopt a long investment<br />

horizon. Transaction costs<br />

are best absorbed by having a<br />

long investment horizon.<br />

2 / Mind the leverage. Sufficient<br />

own funds help to avoid<br />

fire sales as price and liquidity<br />

cycles can be long.<br />

3 / Know your product.<br />

Legis lation is very different for<br />

distinct types of real estate<br />

funds and country-dependent.<br />

Some setups are more<br />

exposed to liquidity problems.<br />

4 / Take your time. Avoid<br />

making your decision to buy<br />

or sell too quickly. This could<br />

turn out to be very costly.<br />

5 / Add real estate to your<br />

port folio. Do not be frightened<br />

of illiquidity. Real estate is<br />

a good diversifier in portfolios.<br />

01_Allocation to property in<br />

UHNWI investment portfolios<br />

While residential property (main residence and<br />

any second homes) makes up almost 30% of<br />

the total net worth of UHNWIs, real estate also<br />

plays an important role when it comes to making<br />

investments. On average, property accounts<br />

for 24% of UHNWI investment portfolios.<br />

In over 40% of all cases, this share has even<br />

increased in recent years.<br />

Source: Knight Frank, The Wealth Report 2014<br />

in percent<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Australasia<br />

Asia<br />

Russia/CIS<br />

Africa<br />

Global<br />

Europe<br />

Middle East<br />

North America<br />

Latin America<br />

When talking about illiquid <strong>assets</strong>,<br />

real estate is at the forefront as<br />

it belongs to the most prominent<br />

of illiquid <strong>assets</strong>. In developed<br />

markets, real estate is the most important<br />

wealth contributor in household portfolios and<br />

adds up to enormous amounts of wealth. It is<br />

not surprising that regulators and central<br />

banks pay a lot of attention to real estate<br />

markets. Residential real estate accounts<br />

for almost 30% of net worth in portfolios of<br />

ultrahigh-net-worth individuals (UHNWIs) (see<br />

Figure 1), and pension funds also have a substantial<br />

share of their allocation in real estate<br />

(see Figure 2).<br />

Causes of illiquidity of real estate <strong>assets</strong><br />

The illiquidity feature of real estate results<br />

from a combination of several characteristics.<br />

To begin with, real estate <strong>assets</strong> are always<br />

tied to a certain location. The combination of<br />

a particular location and a specific object<br />

quality creates a unique tangible asset. Consequently,<br />

every building requires a one-off<br />

analysis and, on a microlevel, prices can even<br />

differ heavily on the basis of, for example,<br />

exposure to noise or view. All this is reflected<br />

in the valuation of a property: there is no true<br />

02_Asset allocation of<br />

Swiss pension funds as<br />

of September 2014<br />

Swiss pension funds traditionally have a substantial<br />

allocation to real estate. As of September<br />

2014, almost 20% of their funds were invested<br />

in real estate. This number typically decreases to<br />

some degree when equity markets are doing<br />

particularly well and therefore make up a larger<br />

part of the asset allocation.<br />

Source: Credit Suisse Swiss Pension Fund Index, Q3 2014<br />

2.1%<br />

19.7%<br />

4.9%<br />

31.3%<br />

Liquidity Bonds Equities<br />

Alternative investments Real estate<br />

Mortgages Rest<br />

1.2%<br />

7.0%<br />

33.7%<br />

or objective price. Target prices depend on the<br />

type of valuation model used and on investorspecific<br />

preferences. Finding a price becomes<br />

even more difficult when there is only limited<br />

data available on similar transactions and if<br />

<strong>assets</strong> have rare characteristics. This often<br />

makes price negotiations time-consuming, and<br />

adds to illiquidity. Determining a fair price is<br />

especially important when one considers the<br />

large size of the transaction.<br />

Several other real estate characteristics<br />

contribute to illiquidity, mostly from a cost<br />

perspective. For example, the design and, to<br />

some degree, the location of a building predetermine<br />

its suitability for certain activities.<br />

The conversion of a big department store<br />

into many small retail units is relatively costly,<br />

and regulation must also be taken into account.<br />

Changing the use of a property from<br />

a legal point of view, such as the conversion<br />

of apartments into shops and vice versa, may<br />

be difficult or even impossible. Investors must<br />

bear this in mind and should therefore have a<br />

clear strategy when investing in real estate.<br />

Other costs include legal expenses and taxes<br />

at the transaction stage. In total, there are<br />

five steps in the acquisition of a commercial<br />

building (see Figure 3). At each step, different<br />

types of costs occur. Purchasing a commercial<br />

real estate building typically needs a<br />

negotiation time of about three months, plus<br />

several months to conclude the transaction.<br />

One last reason for the illiquidity of real estate<br />

is simply the state of the market, which can<br />

dry up quickly in periods of excess demand<br />

(when nobody wants to sell a property) or,<br />

more seriously, in a situation of weak demand.<br />

Investors are facing difficult decisions<br />

The main question for investors is whether it<br />

is worth accepting this disadvantage from<br />

a risk-return perspective. This depends on<br />

the time horizon. As high transaction costs<br />

associated with illiquidity are fixed costs,<br />

it makes sense to hold such an asset for a<br />

longer period. Therefore, pension funds and<br />

other institutional or private investors with<br />

a long time horizon are typical real estate investors.<br />

In addition, these investors need to<br />

accept that their real estate positions may not<br />

be 100% liquid at any time. For wealthy investors,<br />

these constraints are easier to cope with<br />

(a fact that is reflected in the higher real estate<br />

allocations of UHNWIs, see Figure 1). For<br />

these investors, it makes sense to accept the<br />

illiquidity and be compensated for it. For example,<br />

the historical average premium to the<br />

intrinsic net asset value (NAV) for listed >

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!