10.08.2017 Views

Illiquid assets

Unwrapping alternative returns Global Investor, 01/2015 Credit Suisse

Unwrapping alternative returns
Global Investor, 01/2015
Credit Suisse

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GLOBAL INVESTOR 1.15 — 59<br />

In the aftermath of the financial crisis, the European securitization<br />

market collapsed. New issuance in European securitization decreased<br />

by more than 75% compared to volumes in 2008 and has<br />

not recovered since then. Primary market activity in 2013 was below<br />

EUR 200 billion, corresponding to only 14% of US issuance over<br />

the same time period (see Figure 1). The lack of a functioning securitization<br />

market is a major disadvantage for European banks, the<br />

economy and investors. Regulatory-forced deleveraging and its negative<br />

impact on lending and economic growth could have been better<br />

mitigated, in our view.<br />

For the European Central Bank (ECB) to be successful in fostering<br />

economic growth, the current pool of <strong>assets</strong> for Quantitative Easing<br />

(QE) might prove to be too narrow, so that the issuance of securitized<br />

investment products based on high-quality <strong>assets</strong> – so-called Qualifying<br />

Securitization (QS) – needs to pick up in order to broaden the<br />

ECB’s investment base. As the ECB is pressuring interest rates and<br />

yields into negative territory, banks are in need of margin expansion.<br />

If structured correctly, this can be achieved by QS and align the banks’<br />

need to earn profits with the ECB’s need for economic growth and<br />

the investors’ need for attractive yield opportunities.<br />

To make the securitization market grow in Europe, it must become<br />

economically attractive for banks. So far, the maths have not quite<br />

worked out, mainly due to regulatory rules with respect to securitization<br />

that result in a lack of “capital relief” for the banks (see box on the<br />

risk capital treatment of different loans and securitizations on p. 61).<br />

Given their need to remain exposed to the part of the securitized <strong>assets</strong><br />

with the highest risk, to which a risk weight of 1,250% is applied, the<br />

transaction simply lacks economic appeal for the banks.<br />

ECB as an asset-backed securities buyer<br />

In 2014, the ECB released details of its asset-backed securities (ABS)<br />

purchase program, which was followed by the release of a legal act<br />

enabling implementation of the purchase program with actual purchases<br />

having started. The ECB has appointed four executing asset<br />

managers for the purchase program. The asset managers will conduct<br />

the purchases on behalf of the Eurosystem and undertake price checks<br />

and due diligence prior to approving the transactions. The program<br />

will involve the purchase of senior tranches and guaranteed mezzanine<br />

tranches of loans originated in the euro area. Greek and Cypriot ABS<br />

will also be included in the purchase, albeit with tighter provisions.<br />

The combined size of the ABS purchase program and covered bond<br />

purchase program will reach EUR 1 trillion.<br />

Several other measures have also been taken in the meantime<br />

to facilitate the development of the securitization market in Europe.<br />

Among them, we would highlight the changes to Solvency II ><br />

Turning an illiquid asset into an investment opportunity takes time<br />

The ECB is in the middle of a multiyear process to regain investors’<br />

and market trust, as well as to foster economic growth. In our view,<br />

the basis for regaining investor trust – including the ECB as an investor<br />

– was provided by the comprehensive asset quality review (AQR)<br />

and the stress test carried out by the ECB and the European Banking<br />

Authority (EBA).<br />

In October 2014, following a yearlong analysis of over a million<br />

pieces of data, the ECB and EBA published the much-awaited results<br />

of the AQR and stress test. The AQR exercise covered 130 banks<br />

within the Eurozone’s 18 countries, with total <strong>assets</strong> of EUR 22.0<br />

trillion accounting for around 82% of total banking <strong>assets</strong> under the<br />

European Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM). The EBA stress<br />

tests covered 123 banks across 22 of the 28 EU countries, including<br />

banks from the UK and the Nordic region. Overall, 25 of the 130 banks<br />

failed, with an identified capital shortfall of EUR 24.6 billion. More<br />

specifically, 13 banks were identified to face capital shortfalls totaling<br />

EUR 9.5 billion.<br />

We believe that the ECB/EBA announcement struck the right balance<br />

between being too harsh and being too lenient, notably highlighting<br />

areas of vulnerability for some of the examined banks. Despite not<br />

forcing them to take immediate action, the ECB made it very clear that<br />

the adjustments would become part of its ongoing supervision of capital<br />

requirements as it continues to forge ahead with the agenda<br />

of improving the quality of European banks’ balance sheets. More<br />

importantly, we believe that the process toward a European Banking<br />

Union has significantly contributed to increased disclosure and transparency,<br />

which is building the basis for a greater investor attraction<br />

toward banking <strong>assets</strong>.<br />

01_Primary market activity of<br />

European and US asset-backed securities<br />

New issuance of asset-backed securities (ABS) remains subdued in<br />

Europe compared to the US. The European market is, however, forecast<br />

to pick up during the course of the year following the launch of the<br />

ECB’s purchase program. Source: AFME, Credit Suisse<br />

in EUR bn<br />

2,500<br />

2,000<br />

1,500<br />

1,000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014<br />

Total European ABS placed Total US ABS placed<br />

European ABS placed in % of US ABS placed (rhs)<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

0%

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!