10.08.2017 Views

Illiquid assets

Unwrapping alternative returns Global Investor, 01/2015 Credit Suisse

Unwrapping alternative returns
Global Investor, 01/2015
Credit Suisse

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GLOBAL INVESTOR 1.15 — 49<br />

Largely due to the current low interest rate<br />

environment, institutional investors such<br />

as insurers and pension funds are increasingly<br />

moving toward allocation into longer-term<br />

illiquid <strong>assets</strong>, in particular into infrastructure<br />

as an asset class. This trend has been a<br />

significant one. In fact, global infrastructure<br />

<strong>assets</strong> under management have seen a<br />

300% increase over the past seven years.<br />

Investors are increasingly putting their money<br />

into the transport, tele communications,<br />

technology, energy and resources sectors,<br />

and backing the large-scale construction<br />

projects these sectors require. While not<br />

without risk, such investment is supported by<br />

governments and supranationals alike.<br />

There is clear evidence that insurers and pension funds<br />

with long maturity liabilities are increasing their asset allocation<br />

to infrastructure as an asset class. Other categories<br />

of investors are larger family offices and sovereign wealth<br />

funds. The investment case is that infrastructure projects or businesses<br />

offer long-term yields that are theoretically fairly stable<br />

and normally can provide inflation protection. Typically, investors<br />

are taking a seven- to ten-year view on the risk / reward of investing<br />

in infrastructure <strong>assets</strong>, but frequently the time horizons can be<br />

considerably longer. According to Preqin, global infrastructure<br />

<strong>assets</strong> under management in unlisted funds are at a record high of<br />

USD 282 billion, having increased threefold since 2007. Of the investors<br />

surveyed by Preqin, 25% plan to invest over USD 400 million<br />

each over the next year in infrastructure, and 90% plan to invest at<br />

least USD 50 million. Preqin estimates that “dry powder”, i. e. uncalled<br />

capital already committed, could be USD 107 billion, while insurance<br />

companies are planning to increase their asset allocation to infrastructure<br />

to 3%.<br />

Infrastructure: The different components<br />

Infrastructure covers a range of differing <strong>assets</strong>, but can be broadly<br />

disaggregated into the transport sectors, telecommunications and<br />

technology, energy, social infrastructure, and resources and waste<br />

management. Examples in the transport sector will include the<br />

construction of new railways / mass transit systems and trains, ports<br />

and shipping, airports, roads, bridges and tunnels. Telecommunications<br />

and technology investments range from relatively simple, such<br />

as mobile phone masts and fiber-optic cable, to complex projects,<br />

such as server or other tech cluster farms. The energy sector is very<br />

broad, but will include conventional <strong>assets</strong> such as pipelines, storage<br />

facilities, refineries, support infrastructure for oil and gas fields, the<br />

nuclear sector, energy transmission systems and alternative energy<br />

<strong>assets</strong>. There has been significant investment in alternatives such as<br />

on- and offshore wind farms, hydroelectric systems, solar and biomass<br />

plants. Social investments are typically defined as the construction<br />

and maintenance of schools, universities, hospitals and prisons.<br />

Although there is some overlap with the energy sector, resources<br />

and waste management infrastructure includes water management<br />

systems, sewerage, waste collection and the recycling sector.<br />

Typical infrastructure investment vehicles<br />

In an unlisted fund, it is normal for the general partners to manage the<br />

infrastructure <strong>assets</strong> and to appoint management teams as relevant<br />

to the day-to-day management of individual <strong>assets</strong> or projects. Limited<br />

partners will have made an initial capital commitment, and capital<br />

will be called as and when funds are invested. There is typically an<br />

initial investment period, and if the general partner has not invested<br />

funds prior to the maturity of this investment period, then capital<br />

commitments are waived or the limited partners can vote on granting<br />

an extension. There will be clear guidelines on the fund’s turnover,<br />

on investment concentration, leverage, planned repayments to limited<br />

partners, and how, if necessary, the limited partners can vote on<br />

a change in asset manager or general partner. Leverage has to be<br />

carefully monitored since funding can be at the fund level or more<br />

normally embedded in the actual projects or <strong>assets</strong> being invested<br />

in. Leverage levels will typically be higher than what is normally found<br />

in the private equity industry on the assumption that cash flows have<br />

a lower degree of volatility than that in private equity. Sources of >

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!