10.08.2017 Views

Illiquid assets

Unwrapping alternative returns Global Investor, 01/2015 Credit Suisse

Unwrapping alternative returns
Global Investor, 01/2015
Credit Suisse

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GLOBAL INVESTOR 1.15 — 52 ><br />

Advising on illiquid <strong>assets</strong><br />

Looking<br />

beyond<br />

liquidity<br />

Global Investor asked two Credit Suisse wealth managers<br />

to describe the illiquid asset landscape from the point of<br />

view of investors. Do clients feel it is worth trading liquidity<br />

for additional returns? How much of their portfolios do clients<br />

allocate to illiquid <strong>assets</strong>? Are some <strong>assets</strong> more popular<br />

than others? And how does culture affect asset choices?<br />

INTERVIEW BY MANUEL MOSER Senior Financial Editor, Credit Suisse<br />

Manuel Moser: What does a typical client’s<br />

portfolio allocation look like?<br />

Felix Baumgartner: My perception<br />

is that “this” client is invested approximately<br />

40% to 50% in equities and 30% in cash.<br />

The cash tends to come from fixed income.<br />

In other words, when a bond expires, the<br />

money goes into the cash portion of the<br />

account owing to the lack of opportunities<br />

in fixed income. Now, clients are a bit<br />

worried about staying in cash, and consequently<br />

they’re looking for other opportunities,<br />

including illiquid <strong>assets</strong>.<br />

Are some investors more open<br />

to illiquid <strong>assets</strong> than others?<br />

Patrick Schwyzer: There are different<br />

ways of characterizing investor preferences:<br />

by geography, by what stage investors are<br />

in in their lifecycle, by their background<br />

and by the country they live in. For example,<br />

the USA is certainly more open to illiquid<br />

asset investment. Switzerland not so much.<br />

There are a number of reasons for the difference,<br />

one of which could be that in the<br />

USA, people have to administer their own<br />

pension money. That means thinking through<br />

the range of investments for the best yield<br />

and return, whereas in Switzerland we<br />

still delegate the entire business of pensions<br />

to outside parties or the companies’<br />

pension scheme.<br />

What about preferences for various kinds<br />

of illiquid <strong>assets</strong>, such as real estate or<br />

hedge funds?<br />

Felix Baumgartner: The order of<br />

pre ference that we observe is: real estate,<br />

then hedge funds, followed by private equity.<br />

Traditional Swiss investors, in particular,<br />

look for real estate in Switzerland. But there<br />

is not much left here. It’s all been bought<br />

up. Some traditional investors still like gold,<br />

which is not an illiquid asset, of course,<br />

but still very volatile.<br />

How satisfied are clients with the<br />

returns on their investments in illiquid<br />

<strong>assets</strong>?<br />

Felix Baumgartner: I’d say they’re<br />

satisfied with real estate, and with hedge<br />

funds. Private equity could be the next<br />

boom in the coming years because it offers<br />

a long-term investment, diversification and<br />

good returns. But clients are too little invested<br />

in it at present to reap the benefits.<br />

For Swiss-based investors, I would estimate<br />

that private equity currently represents<br />

only about 1% or 2% of their portfolio.<br />

Patrick Schwyzer: I would say it’s more<br />

like 0.5%!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!