27.09.2017 Views

Group Analytic Contexts, Issue 77, September 2017

Newsletter of the Group Analytic Society International

Newsletter of the Group Analytic Society International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

52 <strong>Group</strong>-<strong>Analytic</strong> Society International - <strong>Contexts</strong><br />

and therefore interesting in itself. Is that the main contribution the<br />

large group can offer, a mirror of society?<br />

For me group analysis is a larger project than that. It is about<br />

understanding, but also about transformation and change. In the small<br />

group and the median group this obviously takes place, i.e.<br />

transformation and change. However, it is something the large group<br />

also can contribute to under certain circumstances. One key factor is<br />

the number of members. According to some research results human<br />

beings are able to remember the names of about 150, or at the most<br />

200 persons in an organization or at a work place. It is equivalent to<br />

the number of members in a clan or a tribe, which from a<br />

developmental biology perspective makes sense. In the early history<br />

of human beings, it was important for the survival of the individual to<br />

recognize the members of the large group to which one belonged, to<br />

separate enemies from friends. In a large group with about 150<br />

members it is possible to develop bonds between people where<br />

dialogue can develop. But it will not happen in a group of 400 people.<br />

This simply reflects the basic biological and existential conditions of<br />

being human.<br />

I realize that I probably write this in vain. However, my hope<br />

is that the organizers of the Barcelona symposium will have the<br />

courage to start a new tradition, i.e. to have more than one large group,<br />

preferably three. When I talk about this, many friends have told me<br />

that it would be such a loss not to have the whole symposium dynamic<br />

represented in the large group. This conclusion is wrong; the dynamic<br />

of the larger context will be possible to experience and observe in the<br />

three large groups. That is almost a basic tenet of group analysis. And<br />

all members will meet at opening and closing sessions and during keynote<br />

lectures. What is the point of having a large group consisting of<br />

50% audience and 50% performers, where little development takes<br />

place? One can question if much or anything is learned from the<br />

experience at all.<br />

Christer Sandahl<br />

Stockholm<br />

Christer.Sandahl@ki.se

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!