27.09.2017 Views

Group Analytic Contexts, Issue 77, September 2017

Newsletter of the Group Analytic Society International

Newsletter of the Group Analytic Society International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Newsletter – Autumn <strong>2017</strong> 81<br />

meaning of his Army mythology, of his "neurosis" in the reality of his<br />

life" (1948).<br />

In the time after Northfield, it seemed that the two disciplines<br />

of psychotherapy and social psychiatry approached each other. At the<br />

inaugural meeting symposium of the newly founded Section of<br />

Psychotherapy and Social Psychiatry of the Royal Medico-<br />

Psychological Association in 1949, Rickman said that the joint<br />

development of the two disciplines would remain dependent on these<br />

basic principles:<br />

"To give priority to the client's need and let the doctor's<br />

curiosity and therapeutic ambition come second".<br />

(Rickman 1950, 2003)<br />

Only a few years later, in 1965, the two disciplines had moved<br />

far away from each other. In his role as chairman of the joint section,<br />

Foulkes organized a series of lectures published in 1969 under the title<br />

"Psychiatry in a changing society". He himself wrote in the preface:<br />

“To me it seems that there is a need for a new<br />

orientation in social psychiatry as well as in<br />

psychotherapy; that psychiatry itself will be subjected<br />

to change in view of changing social and cultural<br />

conditions, with the result that the whole of psychiatry<br />

will have to become more conscious of social and<br />

cultural factors. In this sense, the whole of psychiatry is<br />

social psychiatry as well.” (Foulkes, 1969)<br />

And further:<br />

"The antithesis between social and intrapsychic is<br />

misleading. The implication of the individual has been<br />

a psyche, which is his innermost private self and<br />

possession, and that the social and cultural are external<br />

forces, the individual interacting with them, is wrong,<br />

but it is a traditional notion and still reigning - often<br />

quite unconsciously."<br />

The difference between an allegedly objective and a more<br />

personal psychiatry is that "the latter is a dynamic pursuit, entailing<br />

involvement and change in one's own person, and threatening values<br />

and attitudes. There is resistance against such change. " (Foulkes,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!