Theoretical and Experimental DNA Computation (Natural ...
Theoretical and Experimental DNA Computation (Natural ...
Theoretical and Experimental DNA Computation (Natural ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
5.8 <strong>Experimental</strong> Investigations 131<br />
Experiment 13. Comparisons of the two sets of samples showed that digestion<br />
with Sau3A made no difference to the detection limit of the PCR<br />
reactions. As a further control, the products of the above reactions were gel<br />
purified <strong>and</strong> split in two. One half was digested with Sau3A <strong>and</strong> visualized<br />
alongside the other (undigested) control on 2% agarose. The undigested <strong>DNA</strong><br />
ran as a distinct b<strong>and</strong>, whereas the digested half appeared as a high molecular<br />
weight smear.<br />
Experiments 14 <strong>and</strong> 15. An overnight 37 ◦ C digestion using 20U of enzyme<br />
was found to completely destroy the template (i.e., to reduce the level of template<br />
below the limit of PCR detection).<br />
Experiment 16. Nothing could be concluded from this set of reactions since<br />
the positive PCR controls failed.<br />
Experiment 17. The positive <strong>and</strong> negative detection PCR controls worked,<br />
but all other reactions failed. The problem seemed to be due to inefficient<br />
harvesting of the excluded template from the Dynabeads prior to detection<br />
PCR. To get round this problem an unbiotinylated v8 primer was ordered.<br />
Using this primer, detection PCRs could be set up directly from templates<br />
bound to the Dynabeads.<br />
Experiment 18. The results of this experiment gave the first evidence that<br />
the exclusion method could work. The intensity of the specific PCR product<br />
b<strong>and</strong> decreased with increased number of exclusion cycles, although the exclusion<br />
never reached completion. The template was still detectable after 85<br />
cycles of primer extension.<br />
Experiment 19. The use of Klenow produced the same effect as ∼30 to<br />
40 cycles of Taq-based exclusion (i.e., exclusion was not complete), showing<br />
that Klenow offered no advantage over Taq. Detection PCR showed specific<br />
exclusion of v2 = green <strong>and</strong> v2 = blue sequences, but not v2 = red. Thegel<br />
is depicted in Fig. 5.12. A summarized interpretation of this gel is presented<br />
in Table 5.4.<br />
Lanes 1 to 3 show the result of the removal of str<strong>and</strong>s encoding v2 = red. Lane<br />
1, corresponding to v2 = red should be empty, but a faint b<strong>and</strong> is visible. Lanes<br />
2 <strong>and</strong> 3, corresponding to v2 = green <strong>and</strong> v2 = blue primers respectively contain<br />
normal length product, showing that str<strong>and</strong>s not containing the sequence<br />
v2 = red were not removed.<br />
We believe that the incomplete removal of v2 = red str<strong>and</strong>s is due to the<br />
sequence chosen to represent red (AAAAAA). Because adenine only forms<br />
two hydrogen bonds with thymine, the optimum annealing temperature between<br />
str<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> red primers is lower than that for green (CCCCCC) <strong>and</strong><br />
blue (GGGGGG) primers. We believe a simple modification to the encoding<br />
sequence (described later) will solve this problem.