13.12.2012 Views

Theoretical and Experimental DNA Computation (Natural ...

Theoretical and Experimental DNA Computation (Natural ...

Theoretical and Experimental DNA Computation (Natural ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.8 <strong>Experimental</strong> Investigations 131<br />

Experiment 13. Comparisons of the two sets of samples showed that digestion<br />

with Sau3A made no difference to the detection limit of the PCR<br />

reactions. As a further control, the products of the above reactions were gel<br />

purified <strong>and</strong> split in two. One half was digested with Sau3A <strong>and</strong> visualized<br />

alongside the other (undigested) control on 2% agarose. The undigested <strong>DNA</strong><br />

ran as a distinct b<strong>and</strong>, whereas the digested half appeared as a high molecular<br />

weight smear.<br />

Experiments 14 <strong>and</strong> 15. An overnight 37 ◦ C digestion using 20U of enzyme<br />

was found to completely destroy the template (i.e., to reduce the level of template<br />

below the limit of PCR detection).<br />

Experiment 16. Nothing could be concluded from this set of reactions since<br />

the positive PCR controls failed.<br />

Experiment 17. The positive <strong>and</strong> negative detection PCR controls worked,<br />

but all other reactions failed. The problem seemed to be due to inefficient<br />

harvesting of the excluded template from the Dynabeads prior to detection<br />

PCR. To get round this problem an unbiotinylated v8 primer was ordered.<br />

Using this primer, detection PCRs could be set up directly from templates<br />

bound to the Dynabeads.<br />

Experiment 18. The results of this experiment gave the first evidence that<br />

the exclusion method could work. The intensity of the specific PCR product<br />

b<strong>and</strong> decreased with increased number of exclusion cycles, although the exclusion<br />

never reached completion. The template was still detectable after 85<br />

cycles of primer extension.<br />

Experiment 19. The use of Klenow produced the same effect as ∼30 to<br />

40 cycles of Taq-based exclusion (i.e., exclusion was not complete), showing<br />

that Klenow offered no advantage over Taq. Detection PCR showed specific<br />

exclusion of v2 = green <strong>and</strong> v2 = blue sequences, but not v2 = red. Thegel<br />

is depicted in Fig. 5.12. A summarized interpretation of this gel is presented<br />

in Table 5.4.<br />

Lanes 1 to 3 show the result of the removal of str<strong>and</strong>s encoding v2 = red. Lane<br />

1, corresponding to v2 = red should be empty, but a faint b<strong>and</strong> is visible. Lanes<br />

2 <strong>and</strong> 3, corresponding to v2 = green <strong>and</strong> v2 = blue primers respectively contain<br />

normal length product, showing that str<strong>and</strong>s not containing the sequence<br />

v2 = red were not removed.<br />

We believe that the incomplete removal of v2 = red str<strong>and</strong>s is due to the<br />

sequence chosen to represent red (AAAAAA). Because adenine only forms<br />

two hydrogen bonds with thymine, the optimum annealing temperature between<br />

str<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> red primers is lower than that for green (CCCCCC) <strong>and</strong><br />

blue (GGGGGG) primers. We believe a simple modification to the encoding<br />

sequence (described later) will solve this problem.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!