13.12.2012 Views

Theoretical and Experimental DNA Computation (Natural ...

Theoretical and Experimental DNA Computation (Natural ...

Theoretical and Experimental DNA Computation (Natural ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

148 6 Cellular Computing<br />

of truly interdisciplinary scientists who are equally at home at the lab bench<br />

or writing software at the computer.<br />

However, the seeds of the relationship between biology <strong>and</strong> computer science<br />

were sown over fifty years ago, when the latter discipline did not even<br />

exist. When, in the 17th century, the French mathematician <strong>and</strong> philosopher<br />

René Descartes declared to Queen Christina of Sweden that animals could be<br />

considered a class of machines, she challenged him to demonstrate how a clock<br />

could reproduce. Three centuries later in 1951, with the publication of “The<br />

General <strong>and</strong> Logical Theory of Automata” [151] John von Neumann showed<br />

how a machine could indeed construct a copy of itself. Von Neumann believed<br />

that the behavior of natural organisms, although orders of magnitude more<br />

complex, was similar to that of the most intricate machines of the day. He<br />

believed that life was based on logic.<br />

Twenty years later, the Nobel laureate Jacques Monod identified specific<br />

natural processes that could be viewed as behaving according to logical principles:<br />

“The logic of biological regulatory systems abides not by Hegelian<br />

laws but, like the workings of computers, by the propositional algebra<br />

of George Boole.” [109]<br />

This conclusion was drawn from earlier work of Jacob <strong>and</strong> Monod [110]. In<br />

addition, Jacob <strong>and</strong> Monod described the “lactose system” [82], which is one<br />

of the archetypal examples of a Boolean system. We now describe this system<br />

in detail.<br />

Genes are composed of a number of distinct regions, which control <strong>and</strong><br />

encode the desired product. These regions are generally of the form promoter–<br />

gene–terminator (Fig. 6.1). Transcription may be regulated by effector<br />

molecules known as inducers <strong>and</strong> repressors, which interact with the promoter<br />

<strong>and</strong> increase or decrease the level of transcription. This allows effective<br />

control over the expression of proteins, avoiding the production of unnecessary<br />

compounds. It is important to note at this stage that genetic regulation does<br />

not conform to the digital “on-off” model that is popularly portrayed; rather,<br />

it is continuous or analog in nature.<br />

One of the most well-studied genetic systems is the lac operon. Anoperon<br />

is a set of functionally related genes with a common promoter. An example of<br />

this is the lac operon, which contains three structural genes that allow E.coli<br />

to utilize the sugar lactose.<br />

When E.coli is grown on the common carbon source glucose, the product<br />

of the lacI gene represses the transcription of the lacZYA operon (Fig. 6.2).<br />

However, if lactose is supplied together with glucose, a lactose by-product<br />

is produced which interacts with the repressor molecule, preventing it from<br />

repressing the lacZYA operon. This de-repression does not itself initiate transcription,<br />

since it would be inefficient to utilize lactose if the more common<br />

sugar glucose were still available. The operon is positively regulated by the<br />

CAP-cAMP (catabolite activator protein: cyclic adenosine monophosphate)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!