QHA_May_sm_for web
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS with Lyndsay Balch<br />
DEBATE OVER THE ANNUAL WAGE REVIEW<br />
<strong>QHA</strong> REVIEW | 50<br />
AS TASKED BY THE FAIR WORK ACT 2009 (‘THE<br />
ACT’), THE FAIR WORK COMMISSION (‘FWC’) IS<br />
CURRENTLY UNDERTAKING ITS ANNUAL REVIEW<br />
OF MINIMUM WAGES FOR BOTH AWARD FREE<br />
EMPLOYEES AND THOSE COVERED BY A MODERN<br />
AWARD SUCH AS THE HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY<br />
(GENERAL) AWARD 2010 (‘THE HIGA’).<br />
As with previous years, the wage review involves a<br />
panel consisted of experts in workplace relations,<br />
economics, business and social policy considering<br />
submissions from a range of interested parties against<br />
the minimum wage and modern award objectives<br />
contained in Part 2-6 of the Act.<br />
Employer interest groups have cited inconsistencies<br />
in economic growth across regions and industries,<br />
coupled with the fact that the majority of minimum<br />
wage earners are employed by <strong>sm</strong>all businesses<br />
in asserting that any rise in excess of 2% would be<br />
counter-productive. The Australian Hotels Association<br />
(AHA) offered its support <strong>for</strong> a modest 1.9% increase,<br />
as recommended by the Australian Chamber of<br />
Commerce and Industry (ACCI). Peak retail bodies<br />
including The National Retailers’ Association attempted<br />
to reason away any increase at all on the basis of the<br />
growing wages bill associated with the introduction<br />
of casual overtime payments (which were similarly<br />
inserted in the HIGA from 1 January this year).<br />
Despite this rhetoric, strong counter-arguments have<br />
been put to the FWC in support of “progress toward<br />
a living wage” as touted in the Australian Council of<br />
Trade Unions’ (ACTU) submission <strong>for</strong> a 7.2% increase.<br />
The Queensland Government and its federal labour<br />
counterparts echo the ACTU in calling <strong>for</strong> a rise in<br />
excess of last year’s 3.3% increase on the basis that:<br />
• Data indicates the profit margins <strong>for</strong> businesses<br />
of all sizes have grown, suggesting a generous<br />
increase is af<strong>for</strong>dable even <strong>for</strong> <strong>sm</strong>all businesses<br />
• Disparity between the minimum and median wage<br />
is at an all-time high<br />
• Local and international evidence demonstrates that<br />
increases can be sustained without costing jobs<br />
and FWC assertions that concerns to the contrary<br />
had <strong>for</strong>med an ‘overly cautious’ approach to<br />
previous decisions.<br />
• Low wage growth Australia has been identified<br />
by the Reserve Bank as a contributor to lagging<br />
economic growth<br />
Final consultations are expected to take place mid-<br />
<strong>May</strong> and as per previous years, a decision is likely to<br />
be announced in mid-June, with the date of effect of<br />
any increase granted to be from the first full pay period<br />
on or after 1 July 2018. The <strong>QHA</strong> will keep members<br />
in<strong>for</strong>med of the FWC’s decision.