18.05.2018 Views

QHA_May_sm_for web

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS with Lyndsay Balch<br />

DEBATE OVER THE ANNUAL WAGE REVIEW<br />

<strong>QHA</strong> REVIEW | 50<br />

AS TASKED BY THE FAIR WORK ACT 2009 (‘THE<br />

ACT’), THE FAIR WORK COMMISSION (‘FWC’) IS<br />

CURRENTLY UNDERTAKING ITS ANNUAL REVIEW<br />

OF MINIMUM WAGES FOR BOTH AWARD FREE<br />

EMPLOYEES AND THOSE COVERED BY A MODERN<br />

AWARD SUCH AS THE HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY<br />

(GENERAL) AWARD 2010 (‘THE HIGA’).<br />

As with previous years, the wage review involves a<br />

panel consisted of experts in workplace relations,<br />

economics, business and social policy considering<br />

submissions from a range of interested parties against<br />

the minimum wage and modern award objectives<br />

contained in Part 2-6 of the Act.<br />

Employer interest groups have cited inconsistencies<br />

in economic growth across regions and industries,<br />

coupled with the fact that the majority of minimum<br />

wage earners are employed by <strong>sm</strong>all businesses<br />

in asserting that any rise in excess of 2% would be<br />

counter-productive. The Australian Hotels Association<br />

(AHA) offered its support <strong>for</strong> a modest 1.9% increase,<br />

as recommended by the Australian Chamber of<br />

Commerce and Industry (ACCI). Peak retail bodies<br />

including The National Retailers’ Association attempted<br />

to reason away any increase at all on the basis of the<br />

growing wages bill associated with the introduction<br />

of casual overtime payments (which were similarly<br />

inserted in the HIGA from 1 January this year).<br />

Despite this rhetoric, strong counter-arguments have<br />

been put to the FWC in support of “progress toward<br />

a living wage” as touted in the Australian Council of<br />

Trade Unions’ (ACTU) submission <strong>for</strong> a 7.2% increase.<br />

The Queensland Government and its federal labour<br />

counterparts echo the ACTU in calling <strong>for</strong> a rise in<br />

excess of last year’s 3.3% increase on the basis that:<br />

• Data indicates the profit margins <strong>for</strong> businesses<br />

of all sizes have grown, suggesting a generous<br />

increase is af<strong>for</strong>dable even <strong>for</strong> <strong>sm</strong>all businesses<br />

• Disparity between the minimum and median wage<br />

is at an all-time high<br />

• Local and international evidence demonstrates that<br />

increases can be sustained without costing jobs<br />

and FWC assertions that concerns to the contrary<br />

had <strong>for</strong>med an ‘overly cautious’ approach to<br />

previous decisions.<br />

• Low wage growth Australia has been identified<br />

by the Reserve Bank as a contributor to lagging<br />

economic growth<br />

Final consultations are expected to take place mid-<br />

<strong>May</strong> and as per previous years, a decision is likely to<br />

be announced in mid-June, with the date of effect of<br />

any increase granted to be from the first full pay period<br />

on or after 1 July 2018. The <strong>QHA</strong> will keep members<br />

in<strong>for</strong>med of the FWC’s decision.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!