16.12.2012 Views

Notas / Notes - Active Congress.......

Notas / Notes - Active Congress.......

Notas / Notes - Active Congress.......

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

VIERNES / FRIDAY<br />

188<br />

ligament should be released first. This leaves the posterior<br />

oblique portion intact to provide stability both in flexion and<br />

extension.<br />

TIGHT IN EXTENSION, BALANCED IN FLEXION<br />

In some cases the posterior medial structures are tight and<br />

the anterior MCL is normal after insertion of the trial components.<br />

These knees are tight in extension, but balanced normally in<br />

flexion. Knees that are tight only in extension after total knee<br />

arthroplasty first should have release of the posterior oblique<br />

fibers of the MCL, and release of the posterior capsule if medial<br />

contracture persists in extension. This procedure leaves<br />

the anterior portion of the MCL intact to stabilize the knee.<br />

TIGHT MEDIALLY IN FLEXION AND EXTENSION<br />

In many cases with a long-standing varus deformity and<br />

medial ligament contracture, the knee is tight medially both<br />

in flexion and extension. This indicates that the entire MCL<br />

is contracted. The posterior capsule and PCL also may be<br />

contracted, but the primary contracture is the MCL in these<br />

cases. The PCL and posterior capsule cannot be evaluated<br />

until the MCL contracture has been corrected. Knees that<br />

are tight in flexion and extension have release of the anterior<br />

and posterior portions of the medial collateral ligament. This<br />

is done by first stripping the anterior portion of the MCL in<br />

line with the tibial long axis, then directing the osteotome<br />

posteriorly to release the posterior portion of the ligament.<br />

Those knees that remain tight in full extension after release<br />

of the posterior oblique MCL have release of the posterior<br />

medial capsule from the femur and tibia. If inappropriate posterior<br />

femoral rollback occurs, or if medial ligament tightness<br />

remains in flexion after release of the anterior portion of the<br />

MCL, the PCL is released from its tibial attachment.<br />

TIGHT POPLITEUS TENDON<br />

Occasionally the popliteus tendon and its surrounding structures<br />

are tight in the varus knee after the medial side has been<br />

corrected. This often is difficult to detect, but rotational stability<br />

testing of the tibia demonstrates that the tibia is held anteriorly<br />

on the lateral side and pivots around the lateral edge of the<br />

tibial component. The popliteus tendon is released from its<br />

bone attachment when the knee is flexed. It is found just distal<br />

and posterior to the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) attachment,<br />

and care must be taken to avoid release of the LCL<br />

during this procedure.<br />

COMPENSATORY LATERAL RELEASEEXTENSION ONLY<br />

Occasionally, after full MCL release, the knee is excessively<br />

loose on the medial side in extension, and tight laterally.<br />

Compensatory lateral release corrects the imbalance, and<br />

a thicker tibial component brings the knee to correct stability.<br />

COMPENSATORY LATERAL RELEASEFLEXION AND<br />

EXTENSION<br />

In some cases after full release of the MCL, the secondary<br />

stabilizers are inadequate to provide medial stability in flexion<br />

and extension, and the knee is too loose medially after the<br />

tibial component has been sized to bring the lateral ligaments<br />

to their normal tension. In those cases the LCL and popliteus<br />

tendon are released to create more laxity both in flexion and<br />

extension, and a thicker tibial component is used to tension<br />

the medial structures.<br />

MEDIAL PIVOT KNEE ARTHROPLASTY<br />

J. David Blaha, M.D.<br />

University of Michigan. Medical School,<br />

(USA)<br />

Design of total knee prostheses is predicated on knowledge<br />

of the kinematics of the normal knee. Designs that more closely<br />

mimic the normal might reasonably be expected to perform<br />

more normally for the patient. For many years the knee joint<br />

has been viewed as a “four-bar link” in which the ligaments<br />

(specifically the cruciate ligaments) guide the motion of the knee<br />

in such a way that “rollback” occurs. (Rollback is the progressive<br />

posterior movement of the contact point between the femur<br />

and the tibia with increasing flexion.) Proponents of the fourbar<br />

link model point to studies that have shown a decreasing<br />

radius of curvature of the femoral condyles from distal to posterior.<br />

Several recent studies of knee joint kinematics have suggested<br />

that the knee can be modeled as having a single axis of flexion-extension.<br />

Similarly, the internal and external rotation of<br />

the tibia around the femur (i.e., the pivot) of the knee can be<br />

modeled by an axis roughly at the central part of the medial<br />

condyle. (van Dijk et al. 1983, Blankevoort et al. 1988, Hollister<br />

et al. 1993, Mancinelli et al. 1994, Blaha et al. 2003) These<br />

studies show that the normal knee does not roll-back, but<br />

rather remains remarkably constant in position on the medial<br />

side (like a ball in a socket) while varying in contact position<br />

on the lateral side to accommodate internal and external<br />

rotation of the tibia about the femur.<br />

Kinematic studies of total knee prostheses designed respecting<br />

the concept of the “four-bar link” and providing for roll back<br />

have demonstrated paradoxical kinematics. Instead of rolling<br />

back, these knees demonstrate sliding forward of the femur<br />

on the tibia during in vivo fluoroscopic studies. A similar kinematic<br />

study done with a knee joint designed for medial pivot and<br />

medial ball-in-socket kinematics does not demonstrate paradoxical<br />

motion. (Banks et al. 1997, Dennis et al 1997, Blaha et<br />

al. 1998)<br />

The Advance® Medial-Pivot (Wright Medical Technology, Arlington<br />

TN USA) total knee prosthesis has been in clinical use<br />

for 5 years (as of January, 2003). Based on the preliminary results<br />

available at the time of the writing of this abstract the medial<br />

ball-in-socket configuration of the implant appears to provide<br />

a clinical result characterized by enhanced anterior-posterior<br />

stability both to clinical examination and in functional use.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!