16.12.2012 Views

Notas / Notes - Active Congress.......

Notas / Notes - Active Congress.......

Notas / Notes - Active Congress.......

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

VIERNES / FRIDAY<br />

196<br />

knee designs have as a goal the restoration of knee motion<br />

to the maximum achievable by each patient. Those patients<br />

who can achieve motion greater than 135 degrees can benefit<br />

from the “ high flexion” knees. The key to obtaining optimum<br />

knee flexion is designing the articular surface geometry so<br />

that femoral roll back is achieved with either a retained posterior<br />

cruciate ligament or a ligament substituting cam mechanism.<br />

Optimization of the articular surface position is more critical<br />

for the retained cruciate design. Once the anterior/posterior<br />

curvature of the articular surface and its location is optimized,<br />

the knee joint’s wear rate may be minimized by choosing appropriate<br />

medial/lateral radii of curvature. An additional design<br />

requirement for joint surface curvature is to balance knee joint<br />

laxity against knee joint stability. The choice of materials also<br />

has a major impact on minimizing joint wear.<br />

WEAR ANALYSIS OF RETRIEVED<br />

UHMWPE TIBIAL COMPONENTS FROM<br />

ROTATING PLATFORM TOTAL KNEE<br />

REPLACEMENTS<br />

Victor M. Goldberg, M.D; Ryan Garcia, M.D;<br />

Matthew Kraay, M.D; Clare Rinmac, Ph.D.<br />

Case Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedics<br />

Cleveland, Ohio (USA)<br />

Mobile-bearing total knee replacements (TKRs) were designed<br />

to increase conformity, decrease contact stresses, and decrease<br />

polyethylene damage. Our objective was to evaluate the<br />

performance of retrieved mobile-bearing TKRs with respect<br />

to wear damage of the polyethylene in a series of components<br />

obtained at revision surgery. Tibial component polyethylene<br />

superior and inferior surface damage and radiographic radiolucency<br />

analysis was conducted on 40 retrieved mobile-bearing<br />

TKRs. Higher levels of superior articulating surface damage<br />

were found to be associated with higher levels of inferior surface<br />

damage in this retrieval study. Greater levels of damage<br />

were present on both surfaces in components with greater<br />

radiographic radiolucency scores and mechanically loose component.<br />

The mobile bearing TKR remains vulnerable to polyethylene<br />

wear damage at the superior surface and introduced<br />

an independent inferior surface also vulnerable to wear damage.<br />

MOBILE BEARINGS:<br />

ARE THEY WORTH IT?<br />

Peter Bonutti, MD<br />

Bonutti Clinic. Effingham, Illinois (USA)<br />

Mobile Bearing is a technology which adds additional cost<br />

to Knee Arthroplasty. Are there added clinical benefits to justify<br />

this cost? Numerous factors have been suggested to add<br />

clinical value in MB TKA. However, a critical review of clinical<br />

data may not support this. Alleged clinical benefits for MB<br />

TKA include: 1) “The only knee that bends and rotates” -<br />

False. 2) Improved function - Not accurate. 3) Improved ROM<br />

- False. 4) Improved long term survivorship - unproven. 5)<br />

Reduced polyethylene wear - not proven in in vivo studies.<br />

6) Improved patellofemoral tracking - inaccurate. 7) “Surgical<br />

forgiveness” - actually more challenging. In addition, MB TKA<br />

may have additional complications not found in fixed bearings<br />

such as bearing subluxations, dislocations, and insert fractures.<br />

Two recent clinical studies, Ball et al (2006) and Delport et<br />

al (2006), have suggested possible functional benefit in<br />

flexion and stair climbing, but these may be design or<br />

technique specific.<br />

MB TKA theoretical advantages possibly may be design or<br />

technique specific, but the majority of clinical literature does<br />

not prove benefit associated with MB TKA and there is published<br />

technical complexity and risk. Based on current review<br />

MB TKA is not worth the additional cost.<br />

HIGH FLEXION, ROTATING PLATFORM<br />

TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY:<br />

SCIENTIFIC BASIS AND CLINICAL<br />

EXPERIENCE<br />

Richard “Dickey” Jones, M.D.<br />

U.T. Shoutwestern Medical Center.<br />

Dallas, Texas, (USA)<br />

High flexion in TKA is any flexion beyond 125°. High flexion<br />

lifestyle activities such as kneeling or praying are done with<br />

internal rotation, external rotation, and in neutral. Therefore,<br />

maximum flexion TKA requires a rotating platform. Superior<br />

range of motion and fluoroscopic kinematics of femoral rollback<br />

have been shown with the Sigma RP posterior stabilized<br />

knee. This knee was modified to produce the Sigma RP-F,<br />

a maximum flexion knee, by adding a third contact area at<br />

the post-cam mechanism to significantly increase bearing<br />

conformity and decrease poly stresses in the range of 125-<br />

155. Clinical experience is reported with statistically significant<br />

increase in postoperative range of motion in patients with the<br />

Sigma RP-F. Patient selection criteria for the Sigma RP-F<br />

include patients with high flexion lifestyle, younger, more active<br />

patients demanding a better ROM, and those patients<br />

with less than 100° preoperative ROM. This knee system<br />

shows significant promise in providing maximum flexion and<br />

system longevity is expected.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!