16.12.2012 Views

Notas / Notes - Active Congress.......

Notas / Notes - Active Congress.......

Notas / Notes - Active Congress.......

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

VIERNES / FRIDAY<br />

222<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Christie MJ. Clinical applications of Trabecular Metal. Am<br />

J Orthop. 2002 Apr;31(4):219-20.<br />

2. Cohen R. A porous tantalum trabecular metal: basic science.<br />

Am J Orthop. 2002 Apr;31(4):216-7. Review.<br />

3. Dennis DA, Little LR. The structural allograft composite<br />

in revision total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2005<br />

Sep;28(9):1005-7.<br />

4. Gross AE, Goodman SB. Rebuilding the skeleton: the intraoperative<br />

use of trabecular metal in revision total hip<br />

arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2005 Jun;20(4 Suppl 2):91-3<br />

5. Nelson CL, Lonner JH, Lahiji A, Kim J, Lotke PA. Use of<br />

a trabecular metal patella for marked patella bone loss<br />

during revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty.<br />

2003 Oct;18(7 Suppl 1):37-41.<br />

6. Paprosky WG, O’Rourke M, Sporer SM.The treatment of<br />

acetabular bone defects with an associated pelvic discontinuity.<br />

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Dec;441:216-20.<br />

7. Rosenberg AG. The use of bone graft for managing bone<br />

defects in complex total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee<br />

Surg. 1997 Winter;10(1):42-8.<br />

8. Stiehl JB Trabecular metal in hip reconstructive surgery.<br />

Orthopedics. 2005 Jul;28(7):662-70.<br />

BONE GROWTH ENHACING FACTORS<br />

Thomas J. Moore<br />

Emory University. Scool of Medicine Atlanta,<br />

Georgia (USA)<br />

MANAGEMENT OF PERIPROSTHETIC<br />

FRACTURES IN TOTAL KNEE<br />

ARTHROPLASTY<br />

E. Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán, MD, PhD<br />

Department of Orthopaedics, La Paz University Hospital,<br />

Madrid, (Spain)<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

When a treatment option is chosen in a peri-prosthetic fracture<br />

of the knee, consideration must be given to multiple factors<br />

including:<br />

- The status of the prosthetic fixation<br />

- The degree of comminution of the fracture<br />

- The proximity of the fracture to the prosthetic component<br />

- The longitudinal alignment of the limb<br />

- The degree of displacement of the fracture (table 1)<br />

- The extent of osteoporosis<br />

Table 1. Classification of periprosthetic supracondylar<br />

fractures (Rorabeck et al, Instr Course Lect 1998;<br />

47:449-458)<br />

Type 1 Undisplaced fracture – Prosthesis stable<br />

Type 2 Displaced fracture – Prosthesis stable<br />

Type 3 Displaced or undisplaced fracture – Prosthesis<br />

loose or failing<br />

TYPES OF BONE FIXATION<br />

- Rush rods plus cement<br />

- Condylar blade-plate<br />

- Supracondylar locked rod<br />

- LISS (better, if rapid mobilization is needed<br />

TREATMENT OF TYPE 3 FRACTURES<br />

A displaced or undisplaced supracondylar fracture adjacent<br />

to a loose or failing total knee implant (type 3 fracture) can<br />

be treated in one of two ways: like a displaced supracondylar<br />

fracture (type 2 fracture), with revision of the implant at a<br />

later date, or with revision of the implant as part of the fracture<br />

stabilization.<br />

If the surgeon performs a revision, the implant should be<br />

replaced with a long-stemmed femoral component, a custommade<br />

component or tumor prosthesis, or an allograft-implant<br />

composite that also replaces the damaged distal aspect of<br />

the femur.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!