16.12.2012 Views

Notas / Notes - Active Congress.......

Notas / Notes - Active Congress.......

Notas / Notes - Active Congress.......

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MIÉRCOLES / WEDNESDAY<br />

84<br />

15.15 - 18.30 h<br />

CADERA / HIP<br />

Cadera de revisión / Hip revision<br />

Moderador: Antonio Coscujuela<br />

SURGICAL TECHNIQUES IN REVISION<br />

HIP ARTHROPLASTY<br />

Peter McLardy-Smith and the Oxford Hip & Knee Group<br />

Nuffielsd Orthopaedic Centre,<br />

Oxford (Great Britian)<br />

Revision hip arthroplasty is an increasingly important problem<br />

with numbers and technical difficulty increasing. One of the<br />

major challenges is bone loss and successful outcome is inversely<br />

related to the extent of bone deficiency.<br />

In the femur weakened or absent bone can be by passed<br />

by devices which rely on distal fixation in the diaphysis, but<br />

this will lead to proximal stress shielding and further weakening<br />

of remaining proximal femoral bone. Impaction allografting<br />

is an established technique aiming to reconstitute the proximal<br />

femoral bone by cementing a polished tapered wedge in to<br />

the graft construct. This paper describes the use of a specific<br />

modular device (the Oxford Universal Hip) in which the metaphyseal<br />

portion slides over the diaphyseal stem, but is not<br />

fixed to its surface so that it is free to sink or rotate on the<br />

stem. The stem can therefore by bypass distal defects and<br />

the bone impaction is needed only in the metaphyseal portion,<br />

where the load transfer occurs.<br />

Using this technique we have studied 173 hips, in which<br />

there were severe metaphyseal defects (Paprosky Grade<br />

3A or worse). Using the Oxford Hip Score there was a highly<br />

significant improvement in score post operatively and the<br />

worst case survivorship is 93%. A mean of only 1.8 femoral<br />

heads were required for the impaction grafting. Post operative<br />

fractures at the tip of the previous failed prosthesis are<br />

eliminated by the long stem and because the polished wedge<br />

was cemented into the graft construct, local antibiotics<br />

delivery is enabled from the cement.<br />

CEMENT-IN-CEMENT REVISION<br />

-DECREASING THE MORBIDITY OF<br />

REVISION SURGERY<br />

A. John Timperley<br />

Princess Elisabeth Orthopeadic Hospital,<br />

Exeter (Great Britain)<br />

IMPACTED BONE GRAFT<br />

IN FEMORAL REVISION<br />

Aaron G. Rosenberg MD<br />

Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery Rush Medical College<br />

Chicago, Illinois (USA)<br />

The revision technique of of impacting allograft bone chips<br />

into the proximal femoral canal and then using cement to fix<br />

the stem in the newly “created” allograft neo-endosteal canal<br />

allows for better cement fixation at the endosteal surface by<br />

improving the quality of the bone present for cement interdigitation<br />

while allowing for bone stock restoration to the<br />

upper end of the femur. This is a particularly appropriate<br />

technique in the patient who has substantially compromised<br />

endosteal bone stock or substantial endosteal expansion<br />

(the so called patulous proximal femur). This technique may<br />

also be helpful when used above long distal cement columns<br />

that may be difficult to remove and can be used to support<br />

the bone packing above. The procedure is technique dependent,<br />

requires appropriate equipment and should be used<br />

after appropriate training.<br />

Several centers have reported intermediate-term results,<br />

most often using stems of a similar geometry: a double-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!