Notas / Notes - Active Congress.......

MIÉRCOLES / WEDNESDAY
60
if the stem anteversion is 10-20 degrees, the cup anteversion
should be 20 degrees, whereas if the stem anteversion is 5
degrees, the cup anteversion should be close to 30 degrees.
We rarely exceed 30 degrees of cup anteversion because
exceeding 30 degrees increases the risk of impingement in
external rotation and abduction and extension in external
rotation.
REFERENCES
1. Barrack, R. L.: Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty:
implant design and orientation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg,
11(2): 89-99, 2003.
2. D’Lima, D. D.; Chen, P. C.; and Colwell, C. W., Jr.: Optimizing
acetabular component position to minimize impingement
and reduce contact stress. J Bone Joint Surg
Am, 83-A Suppl 2 Pt 2: 87-91, 2001.
3. D’Lima, D. D.; Urquhart, A. G.; Buehler, K. O.; Walker,
R. H.; and Colwell, C. W., Jr.: The effect of the orientation
of the acetabular and femoral components on the range
of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone
Joint Surg Am, 82(3): 315-21, 2000.
4. Dorr LD: Hip arthroplasty. Minimally invasive techniques
and computer navigation, 1st edition. Philadelphia, PA,
Saunders Elsevier, 2006.
5. Dorr, L. D.; Malik, A.; Wan, Z.; Long, W. T.; and Harris,
M.: Precision and Bias of Imageless Computer Navigation
and Surgeon Estimates for Acetabular Component Position.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2007 Dec; 465:92-9.
6. Jolles, B. M.; Genoud, P.; and Hoffmeyer, P.: Computerassisted
cup placement techniques in total hip arthroplasty
improve accuracy of placement. Clin Orthop Relat Res,
(426): 174-9, 2004.
7. Kalteis, T.; Handel, M.; Bathis, H.; Perlick, L.; Tingart, M.;
and Grifka, J.: Imageless navigation for insertion of the
acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: is it as
accurate as CT-based navigation? J Bone Joint Surg Br,
88(2): 163-7, 2006.
8. Lucas DH, S. R.: The Ranawat sign. A specific maneuver
to assess component positioning in total hip arthroplasty.
J Orthop Tech., 2: 59-61, 1994.
9. Malik, A., and Dorr, L. D.: The science of minimally invasive
total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 463: 74-84,
2007.
10. Malik, A.; Maheshwari, A.; and Dorr, L. D.: Impingement
with total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 89(8):
1832-42, 2007.
11. Maruyama, M.; Feinberg, J. R.; Capello, W. N.; and D’Antonio,
J. A.: The Frank Stinchfield Award: Morphologic features
of the acetabulum and femur: anteversion angle and implant
positioning. Clin Orthop Relat Res, (393): 52-65, 2001.
12. McCollum, D. E., and Gray, W. J.: Dislocation after total
hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat
Res, (261): 159-70, 1990.
13. McKibbin, B.: Anatomical factors in the stability of the hip
joint in the newborn. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 52(1): 148-
59, 1970.
14. Parratte, S., and Argenson, J. N.: Validation and usefulness
of a computer-assisted cup-positioning system in
total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, controlled
study. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 89(3): 494-9, 2007.
15. Pierchon, F.; Pasquier, G.; Cotten, A.; Fontaine, C.; Clarisse,
J.; and Duquennoy, A.: Causes of dislocation of total
hip arthroplasty. CT study of component alignment. J Bone
Joint Surg Br, 76(1): 45-8, 1994.
16. Widmer, K. H., and Zurfluh, B.: Compliant positioning of
total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop
Res, 22(4): 815-21, 2004.
17. Wines, A. P., and McNicol, D.: Computed tomography
measurement of the accuracy of component version in total
hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 21(5): 696-701, 2006.
18. Yoshimine, F.: The safe-zones for combined cup and neck
anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and
their optimum combination in total hip replacements. J Biomech,
39(7): 1315-23, 2006.