16.12.2012 Views

Notas / Notes - Active Congress.......

Notas / Notes - Active Congress.......

Notas / Notes - Active Congress.......

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MIÉRCOLES / WEDNESDAY<br />

88<br />

REVISION STRATEGY AT<br />

THE FEMORAL LEVEL<br />

Laurent Sedel<br />

Hôpital Lariboisiere (APHP) and University<br />

of Paris (France)<br />

Femoral revision is frequent, due to femoral loosening , thigh<br />

pain, recurrent dislocation, osteolysis or sepsis. Whatever<br />

the reason, with the exception of some difficult septic cases,<br />

our strategic approach is similar. Some of our expertise concern<br />

femoral stem retrieval. Our reconstruction strategy is<br />

different if we are revising total hip in active and young patient<br />

or if it is an old and inactive one.<br />

First step is always a large “en bloc” tissue excision. For old<br />

and inactive, it is sometimes possible to retain the stem if<br />

not loosened and perform an “in cement” cementation; In<br />

this group we select usually metal or alumina on polyethylene<br />

couple and cemented implants; In young and active, we select<br />

alumina on alumina combination which resumed in<br />

cementless acetabular fixation, and cementless or cemented<br />

stem depending on stem retrieval method.<br />

Stem retrieval of a well fixed cementless stem is performed<br />

via a large transtrochanteric approach associated with a transfemoral<br />

one. Repair is performed using cerclage and long<br />

cemented stem with or without HA/TCP granules impacted.<br />

Cement retrieval is at the moment performed since 4 years<br />

using Ultra sound (Oscar*) material, which in our hand is very<br />

successful specially for retractor retrieval. This allows easy<br />

retrieval without fenestration. Then medullary canal is reamed<br />

in order to receive either a cemented or sometimes a cementless<br />

stem, depending on the bone quality.<br />

Frequently we used a modified Link technique replacing<br />

allogenic morcellised bone by hydroxyapatite granules (45<br />

cases). This can be done either with a cemented or a cementless<br />

stem.<br />

In case of very severe bone loss and osteolysis, we performed<br />

massive allogenic bone transplant associated with long cemented<br />

stem and distal HA granules with cement. (18 cases).<br />

As we usually performed one stage revision for septic cases,<br />

strategy is not different; It is only in selected cases with many<br />

sepsis recurrences and specially aggressive bacteria that<br />

we performed a two stage procedure.<br />

Our goal is always to get a step down to keep the maximum<br />

living bone; and also to get the best functional outcome permitted.<br />

RESULTS WITH CEMENTLESS STEM<br />

REVISION<br />

Karl Zweymüller<br />

Orthopädische Krankenhaus Gersthof,<br />

Wien (Austria)<br />

THE MANAGEMENT OF PERIPROSTHETIC<br />

FEMORAL FRACTURES UTILIZING<br />

A CEMENTLESS TOTAL HIP REVISION<br />

SYSTEM WITH MODULAR DISTAL<br />

FIXATION<br />

Robert A. Fada, MD; Jose A. Rodriguez, MD; Thomas K.<br />

Tkach, MD; Tyler McKee, DO; Jodi F. Hartman, MS; and<br />

Michelle L. Wright, BS<br />

Lenox Hill Hospital. New York (USA)<br />

Periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty<br />

are increasing in frequency and pose a significant technical<br />

challenge to the orthopaedic surgeon. The purpose of this<br />

study was to perform a multi-center, retrospective review of<br />

periprosthetic femoral fractures managed with a specific<br />

cementless, corundumized, modular revision femoral component<br />

and report the results at a minimum 1-year follow-up.<br />

Pre op planning is performed to try and predict the implant<br />

length and depth of penetration. When possible, a 5 cm extent<br />

of bone contact is sought within the distal fragment. The<br />

surgical technique involves removal of the implant in place,<br />

using the fracture site to gain access to any remaining points<br />

of fixation. When necessary for proximal spot welds, the<br />

proximal fragment can be split longitudinally as in a Wagner<br />

technique to allow access to the fixation points. The fracture<br />

is exposed only to the extent necessary to allow implant extraction<br />

and obtain reduction. Every attempt is made to protect<br />

the quadriceps fibers attachment, particularly to the distal<br />

fragment. The distal fragment is reamed through the fracture<br />

site to assure proper positioning, and checking the reamer<br />

position using an image intensifier. Once distal fragment<br />

position and contact is assured, the proximal fragment is<br />

reamed to allow clear implant passage. The distal stem is<br />

then inserted to the predetermined position while maintaining

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!