29.08.2018 Views

atw 2018-09v3

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>atw</strong> Vol. 63 (<strong>2018</strong>) | Issue 8/9 ı August/September<br />

RESEARCH AND INNOVATION 460<br />

| | Fig. 4.<br />

Tempearature and Hydrogen Concetration at the Exit of Test Device of Periodic Inspection<br />

(New Catalyst: 3 % hydrogen and air mixture at 60 °C and 1 bar).<br />

shows temperature rise behavior of<br />

new catylists, which shows a similar<br />

trend with time. Therefore, the PAR<br />

supplier suggested the accepatance<br />

criteria of the periodic inspection as<br />

the temperature rise at a given time<br />

(The exact values of temperature rise<br />

and time are not described in this<br />

paper because that information is a<br />

supplier’s proprietary). Figure 5<br />

shows temperature rise bebavior of<br />

catylists that were exposed to containment<br />

air during one overhaul period.<br />

The behavior of temperature rise is<br />

affected by the existence of VOC.<br />

Some catalysts showed delayed startup<br />

of hydrogen recombination and<br />

others showed further increase of<br />

temperature by combustion of VOC<br />

itself. Figure 5 also shows the hydrogen<br />

volume faction of air-hyrogen<br />

mixture at the outlet of the test device.<br />

It showed that the hydrogen recombination<br />

already started although<br />

the temperature does not reach the<br />

required value. Therefore, there is a<br />

possibility of unneccesary failure of<br />

plant inspection with the current<br />

method by temperature rise. This<br />

method requires relatively long test<br />

time because of larger heat capacity of<br />

ceramic structure. In addition, it is<br />

­difficult to correlate the hydrogen<br />

recombination performance with the<br />

amount of temperature rise and test<br />

time. Threfore, we decided to change<br />

the inspection method from the temperature<br />

rise to the direct measurement<br />

of hydrogen concentration with<br />

new acceptance criterion.<br />

Under the VOC-affected conditions,<br />

the performance of PAR is hard<br />

to identify through the current perioic<br />

inspection method because the startup<br />

delayed time and the hydrogen<br />

­removal rate are defined under the<br />

| | Fig. 5.<br />

Tempearature and Hydrogen Concetration at the Exit of Test Device of Periodic Inspection<br />

(After the Exposue of One Overhaul Period to Containment Air, 3 % hydrogen and<br />

air mixture at 60 °C and 1 bar).<br />

natural convection conditions. Therefore,<br />

a number of catalysts are withdrawn<br />

out of containment during an<br />

overhaul period of each plant and<br />

their performance is tested in the PAR<br />

performance test facility (PPTF) under<br />

the natural convection conditions.<br />

A total of 152 tests are performed<br />

with 608 catalyst samples to investigate<br />

the effect of volatile organic<br />

compounds (VOC) on the startup<br />

performance on the hydrogen<br />

removal. The catalyst samples are<br />

taken from seventeen (17) plants with<br />

four (4) different reactor types. For<br />

plants C, D, F, H and M, the tests are<br />

performed twice in the first and<br />

second outage period to compare test<br />

resuts between the first and the<br />

second outages in the same plant.<br />

Figure 6 shows the measured start-up<br />

delay times in conditions of hydrogen<br />

of 3 vol. %, temperature of 60 °C and<br />

pressure of 1.5 bar. These test conditions<br />

are selected because a start-up<br />

delay time is considered after the<br />

hydrogen concentration and the<br />

temperature reached at both 3 vol. %<br />

and 60 °C in the analysis of hydrogen<br />

control to determine the capacity<br />

and locations of PARs as a hydrogen<br />

mitigation system [2]. Fifteen (15)<br />

minutes of the start-up delay time are<br />

assumed in severe accident analyses<br />

while 12 hours of the start-up delay<br />

time is assumed in design basis accident<br />

analysis [12]. For new catalysts a<br />

certain time is required until the flow<br />

is fully developed by naural convection.<br />

This time has been measured as<br />

about 404 sec with a standard deviation<br />

of 66.9 sec. As shown in Fig. 6,<br />

the start-up delay times are well<br />

within 15 minutes except the plants G<br />

and H. The start-up delay times for<br />

plant G and H1 show an average time<br />

of 1,006 sec and 893 sec with a<br />

standard deviation of 160 sec and<br />

215 sec, respectively. The total averaged<br />

start-up delay time for all plants<br />

is estimated as 660.6 sec with a standard<br />

deviation of 237.8 sec. For plants<br />

C, D, F, H and M, the second tests does<br />

not show a noticeable difference<br />

­compared to its first tests.<br />

In the design basis accident such as<br />

a loss-of-coolant-accident (LOCA),<br />

the hydrogen is generated gradually<br />

and the hydrogen concentration could<br />

be reached at 4 vol. % after several<br />

days without a hydrogen mitigation<br />

system after a LOCA takes places. In<br />

the analysis of hydrogen concentration<br />

in the LOCA, twelve (12) hours of<br />

the start-up delay time were assumed<br />

after the hydrogen concentration and<br />

the catalysts temperature reach at<br />

both 3 vol. % and 60 °C. Although the<br />

start-up delays of 12 hours are considered,<br />

there is a sufficient margin to<br />

maintain the hydrogen concentration<br />

below the regulatory limit of 4 vol. %.<br />

However, in the severe accident conditions,<br />

the hydrogen concentration in<br />

the containment abruptly increases at<br />

the timing of the reactor vessel failure<br />

so that the margin for start-up delay<br />

for hydrogen removal may not be<br />

­sufficient compared to the situation of<br />

a design basis accident. The regulatory<br />

position in Korea is that the startup<br />

delay times should be verified and<br />

compared to the assumptions used in<br />

the analysis of hydrogen control in<br />

DBA and severe accident conditions.<br />

In the case of plant G, H and N, the<br />

analysis of hydrogen control in severe<br />

accident conditions has been re-evaluated<br />

with a longer delay time of<br />

30 minutes in consideration of the<br />

results of the start-up delay time<br />

measurement tests in 2014. For the<br />

Research and Innovation<br />

Effects of Airborne Volatile Organic Compounds on the Performance of Pi/TiO 2 Coated Ceramic Honeycomb Type Passive Autocatalytic Recombiner ı Chang Hyun Kim, Je Joong Sung, Sang Jun Ha and Phil Won Seo

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!