02.10.2019 Views

UploadFile_6417

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

392 Chapter 8 IIR FILTER DESIGN<br />

A quantitative measure of the width of the peak is the 3dB bandwidth of<br />

the filter, denoted as ∆(ω). For values of r close to unity,<br />

∆ω ≈ 2(1 − r) (8.14)<br />

Figure 8.3 illustrates the magnitude and phase responses of a digital resonator<br />

with ω 0 = π/3, r =0.90. Note that the phase response has its<br />

greatest rate of change near the resonant frequency ω r ≈ ω 0 = π/3.<br />

This resonator has two zeros at z =0.Instead of placing zeros at the<br />

origin, an alternative choice is to locate the zeros at z =1and z = −1.<br />

This choice completely eliminates the response of the filter at the frequencies<br />

ω =0and ω = π, which may be desirable in some applications. The<br />

corresponding resonator has the system function<br />

H(z) =<br />

G(1 − z −1 )(1 + z −1 )<br />

(1 − re jω0 z −1 )(1 − re −jω0 z −1 )<br />

and the frequency response characteristic<br />

1 − z −2<br />

= G<br />

1 − (2r cos ω 0 )z −1 + r 2 z −2 (8.15)<br />

H ( e jω) 1 − e −j2ω<br />

= G<br />

[1 − re j(ω0−ω) ][1 − re −j(ω0+ω) ]<br />

(8.16)<br />

where G is a gain parameter that is selected so that ∣ ( )∣ H e<br />

jω 0 ∣ =1.<br />

The introduction of zeros at z = ±1 alters both the magnitude and<br />

phase response of the resonator. The magnitude response may be expressed<br />

as<br />

(<br />

∣ H e<br />

jω )∣ ∣<br />

N(ω)<br />

= G<br />

(8.17)<br />

D 1 (ω)D 2 (ω)<br />

where N(ω) isdefined as<br />

N(ω) = √ 2(1 − cos 2ω) (8.18)<br />

Due to the presence of the zeros at z = ±1, the resonant frequency of the<br />

resonator is altered from the expression given by (8.13). The bandwidth<br />

of the filter is also altered. Although exact values for these two parameters<br />

are rather tedious to derive, we can easily compute the frequency response<br />

when the zeros are at z = ±1 and z =0,and compare the results.<br />

Figure 8.4 illustrates the magnitude and phase responses for the cases<br />

z = ±1 and z =0,for pole location at ω = π/3 and r =0.90. We observe<br />

that the resonator with z = ±1 has a slightly smaller bandwidth than<br />

the resonator with zeros at z =0.Inaddition, there appears to be a very<br />

small shift in the resonant frequency between the two cases.<br />

Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).<br />

Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!