McDonald - The Arthur Page Society
McDonald - The Arthur Page Society
McDonald - The Arthur Page Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
management is listening for threats by issue/environmental scanning. Once an<br />
issue is identified, the next step is to determine whether it is something that will<br />
affect the organization. If the answer is that it will, then the corporation must give<br />
the issue priority in pro-active, timely strategizing.<br />
Choices of response to issues include:<br />
• Acquiescence to demands of opposition—stop doing what is being<br />
criticized<br />
• Negotiation with oppositional forces—strive for compromise and<br />
consensus<br />
• Confrontation —discredit opposition, put forth arguments against<br />
opposition, and/or take legal action against opposition).<br />
4.3 Teaching Points in the <strong>McDonald</strong>’s Case<br />
1. Issues do not develop overnight. Constant monitoring of an issue provides<br />
opportunity to incorporate proactive, rather than defensive, responses early in the<br />
process.<br />
<strong>McDonald</strong>’s had ample opportunity to realize that the issue of health and nutrition<br />
was gaining momentum and that they were being targeted. As early as 1986, an<br />
executive with a major public relations firm working on the <strong>McDonald</strong>’s account sent a<br />
memo to <strong>McDonald</strong>’s referencing a meeting that had been held on nutrition with the<br />
recommendation that <strong>McDonald</strong>’s “should attempt to deflect the basic negative thrust of<br />
our critics.” 128 Ten years later, the Greenpeace advocacy group in England had specified<br />
that one of the things “wrong” with <strong>McDonald</strong>’s was that their food was unhealthy for<br />
consumers. Issue scanning would have alerted <strong>McDonald</strong>’s to the growing controversy<br />
35