atw - International Journal for Nuclear Power | 10.2020

More documents

Info

atw Vol. 65 (2020) | Issue 10 ı October 526 NEWS Top IAEA Report: nuclear power to continue to play key role in low-carbon electricity production (iaea) The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has released its latest projections for energy, electricity and nuclear power trends through 2050. Compared with the previous year, the 2020 projections are largely unchanged. Under the high case scenario, IAEA analysts expect an increase of global nuclear electrical generating capacity by 82 % to 715 GW. Under the low case scenario, it will fall by 7 % to 363 GW. “The latest IAEA annual projections show that nuclear power will continue to play a key role in the world’s low-carbon energy mix, with global nuclear electrical capacity seen nearly doubling by 2050 in our high case scenario. Climate change mitigation remains a key potential driver for maintaining and expanding the use of nuclear power,” IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said. The 40 th edition of Energy, Electricity and Nuclear Power Estimates for the Period up to 2050 provides detailed global trends in nuclear power by region. The report presents its projections for nuclear electrical generating capacity as low and high estimates. They reflect different scenarios for the worldwide deployment of this low carbon energy source. From 2019 to 2050, global electricity generation is expected to more than double, exceeding nuclear generation capacity growth also in the high case scenario. Therefore, IAEA experts expect the share of nuclear power amongst all sources of electricity to remain either stable or decline. In 2019 nuclear power generated 10.4 % of global electricity. According to the report, immediate and concerted action is required for nuclear power to reach a share of @ REFERENCE DATA SERIES No. 1 2020 Edition Energy, Electricity and Nuclear Power Estimates for the Period up to 2050 11 % in electricity production by 2050, as seen in the high case sce nario. In the low case scenario, the share of nuclear energy relative to global electricity production could decline to about 6 %. Operating Results June 2020 Plant name Country Nominal capacity Type gross [MW] net [MW] Operating time generator [h] Energy generated, gross [MWh] Month Year Since commissioning Time availability [%] Energy availability [%] *) Energy utilisation [%] *) Month Year Month Year Month Year OL1 Olkiluoto 1) BWR FI 910 880 543 477 444 3 525 453 272 990 923 75.38 90.99 72.64 87.46 72.08 87.75 OL2 Olkiluoto 1) BWR FI 910 880 720 650 282 3 738 736 263 102 821 100.00 93.86 100.00 93.12 98.17 93.06 KCB Borssele 1) PWR NL 512 484 339 165 638 1 969 845 169 951 279 50.94 88.98 44.36 87.84 44.98 88.25 KKB 1 Beznau 7) PWR CH 380 365 720 272 924 1 348 059 131 656 879 100.00 80.74 100.00 80.46 99.74 81.13 KKB 2 Beznau 7) PWR CH 380 365 720 270 809 1 661 200 138 957 983 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.89 98.98 100.15 KKG Gösgen 1,2,4,7) PWR CH 1060 1010 303 283 006 4 153 577 326 269 812 42.01 90.44 38.03 89.74 37.08 89.73 CNT-I Trillo 1,2) PWR ES 1066 1003 251 250 709 3 612 870 259 360 896 34.82 81.62 32.42 80.69 32.32 77.03 Dukovany B1 PWR CZ 500 473 720 350 616 2 170 129 118 054 312 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.93 97.39 99.39 Dukovany B2 PWR CZ 500 473 720 347 907 2 155 425 113 198 744 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.92 96.64 98.71 Dukovany B3 PWR CZ 500 473 720 348 654 988 528 111 240 264 100.00 46.83 100.00 46.04 96.85 45.27 Dukovany B4 PWR CZ 500 473 720 352 998 1 678 379 112 385 337 100.00 77.01 99.96 76.93 98.06 76.87 Temelin B1 PWR CZ 1080 1030 720 774 754 2 931 378 124 846 191 100.00 62.22 99.95 61.05 99.45 62.04 Temelin B2 1) PWR CZ 1080 1030 285 302 944 4 326 302 121 808 920 39.58 90.04 39.38 89.98 38.89 91.56 Doel 1 2) PWR BE 454 433 529 226 167 226 167 137 962 226 73.49 12.12 67.61 11.15 67.10 11.06 Doel 2 PWR BE 454 433 720 321 607 325 967 136 661 437 100.00 17.47 97.01 16.56 95.33 16.28 Doel 3 PWR BE 1056 1006 720 714 069 4 651 160 267 762 811 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 93.18 100.38 Doel 4 2) PWR BE 1084 1033 118 119 451 4 114 121 273 752 396 16.34 86.21 15.77 85.81 15.00 85.49 Tihange 1 2) PWR BE 1009 962 0 0 0 307 547 424 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tihange 2 PWR BE 1055 1008 720 739 997 4 555 332 262 609 850 100.00 100.00 99.95 99.90 98.24 99.82 Tihange 3 2) PWR BE 1089 1038 147 153 673 4 096 335 284 658 911 20.48 86.89 20.06 86.80 19.68 86.65 Plant name Type Nominal capacity gross [MW] net [MW] Operating time generator [h] Energy generated, gross [MWh] Time availability [%] Energy availability Energy utilisation [%] *) [%] *) Month Year Since Month Year Month Year Month Year commissioning KBR Brokdorf DWR 1480 1410 720 967 463 5 677 362 366 398 384 100.00 100.00 93.63 94.08 90.45 87.48 KKE Emsland DWR 1406 1335 720 1 000 319 5 258 429 362 858 630 100.00 87.60 99.99 87.45 98.82 85.63 KWG Grohnde DWR 1430 1360 720 968 304 4 477 268 392 752 114 100.00 89.32 99.71 89.16 93.46 71.24 KRB C Gundremmingen 1) SWR 1344 1288 293 382 829 4 675 047 345 998 599 40.69 80.98 39.84 79.67 39.20 79.05 KKI-2 Isar DWR 1485 1410 720 1 015 144 6 133 793 371 896 262 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.99 94.47 94.13 GKN-II Neckarwestheim 1,2,4) DWR 1400 1310 448 590 200 5 546 700 345 784 944 62.19 93.77 62.19 93.75 58.54 90.82 News
atw Vol. 65 (2020) | Issue 10 ı October Commitments made under the 2016 Paris Agreement on climate change and other initiatives could support nuclear power development, provided the necessary energy policies and market designs are established to facilitate investments in dispatchable, low carbon technologies. Furthermore, nuclear power could provide solutions for electricity consumption growth, air quality concerns, the security of energy supply and price volatility of other fuels. The report lays out that about two thirds of nuclear power reactors have been in operation for over 30 years, highlighting the need for significant new nuclear capacity to offset retirements. Uncertainty remains regarding the replacement of the large number of reactors scheduled to be retired around 2030 and beyond, particularly in North America and Europe. Ageing management programmes and long term operation are being imple mented for an increasing number of reactors. Operating Results July 2020 Since it was first published 40 years ago, the IAEA projections have been continually refined to reflect an evolving global energy context. Over the past decade, nuclear power development has remained within the range of projections described in prior editions. | www.iaea.org (202621420) World FORATOM underlines key role of nuclear in achieving ambitious climate targets (foratom) FORATOM welcomes the European Commission’s proposal to increase its 2030 CO 2 emission reduction target to at least 55 %. This is essential if the EU is to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050. The nuclear sector stands ready to play its part by providing a stable supply of low-carbon electricity, as well as other energy carriers (e.g. hydrogen). In terms of decarbonising the electricity sector, FORATOM has identified two challenges: ensuring security of supply and costs. “It is clear that by supporting an energy mix which combines both nuclear power and variable renewables, the EU will have access to a low-carbon supply of electricity, 24/7” states Yves Desbazeille, FORATOM Director General. “Such a combination will contribute not only ensuring security of supply, but also keeping the costs of the transition to a minimum”. According to the conclusions of an FTI-CL Energy Consulting study commissioned by FORATOM (“Pathways to 2050: role of nuclear in a low-carbon Europe”), Europe could save more than 440 bn € between 2020 and 2050 by supporting a 25 % share of nuclear in the 2050 electricity mix. Customers would save around 350 bn € in costs, with 90 % of these savings occuring before 2035 thanks primarily to the life-time extension of *) Net-based values (Czech and Swiss nuclear power plants gross-based) 1) Refueling 2) Inspection 3) Repair 4) Stretch-outoperation 5) Stretch-inoperation 6) Hereof traction supply 7) Incl. steam supply BWR: Boiling Water Reactor PWR: Pressurised Water Reactor Source: VGB 527 NEWS Plant name Country Nominal capacity Type gross [MW] net [MW] Operating time generator [h] Energy generated, gross [MWh] Month Year Since commissioning Time availability [%] Energy availability [%] *) Energy utilisation [%] *) Month Year Month Year Month Year OL1 Olkiluoto BWR FI 910 880 744 674 376 4 199 829 273 665 299 100.00 92.30 100.00 89.28 98.52 89.32 OL2 Olkiluoto BWR FI 910 880 744 667 275 4 406 011 263 770 096 100.00 94.75 99.93 94.11 97.49 93.70 KCB Borssele PWR NL 512 484 653 321 983 2 291 828 170 273 262 86.84 88.67 86.91 87.70 84.42 87.69 KKB 1 Beznau 7) PWR CH 380 365 744 273 800 1 621 859 131 930 679 100.00 83.55 100.00 83.30 96.72 83.40 KKB 2 Beznau 7) PWR CH 380 365 744 271 729 1 932 929 139 229 712 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.90 96.00 99.55 KKG Gösgen 7) PWR CH 1060 1010 744 775 109 4 928 686 327 044 921 100.00 91.83 99.99 91.23 98.28 90.97 CNT-I Trillo PWR ES 1066 1003 744 782 497 4 395 367 260 143 393 100.00 84.29 100.00 83.50 97.80 80.05 Dukovany B1 PWR CZ 500 473 744 360 826 2 530 955 118 415 138 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.94 97.00 99.04 Dukovany B2 PWR CZ 500 473 738 349 089 2 504 515 113 547 833 99.19 99.88 97.88 99.62 93.84 98.00 Dukovany B3 PWR CZ 500 473 744 359 231 1 347 758 111 599 495 100.00 54.57 100.00 53.89 96.57 52.74 Dukovany B4 PWR CZ 500 473 744 363 372 2 041 751 112 748 708 100.00 80.36 100.00 80.29 97.68 79.90 Temelin B1 PWR CZ 1080 1030 744 799 584 3 730 962 125 645 775 100.00 67.72 99.97 66.72 99.33 67.47 Temelin B2 1) PWR CZ 1080 1030 0 0 4 326 302 121 808 920 0 76.93 0 76.88 0 78.23 Doel 1 PWR BE 454 433 744 345 072 571 238 138 307 298 100.00 24.91 99.95 24.07 99.44 23.93 Doel 2 PWR BE 454 433 744 342 203 668 170 137 003 640 100.00 29.49 99.07 28.80 98.25 28.44 Doel 3 2) PWR BE 1056 1006 403 357 244 5 008 404 268 120 054 54.22 93.34 53.92 93.29 44.82 92.30 Doel 4 PWR BE 1084 1033 694 719 111 4 833 232 274 471 507 93.31 87.24 89.61 86.36 87.39 85.77 Tihange 1 2) PWR BE 1009 962 0 0 0 307 547 424 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tihange 2 PWR BE 1055 1008 540 541 079 5 096 411 263 150 929 72.61 96.01 70.66 95.64 69.41 95.39 Tihange 3 2) PWR BE 1089 1038 0 0 4 096 335 284 658 911 0 74.24 0 74.16 0 74.04 Plant name Type Nominal capacity gross [MW] net [MW] Operating time generator [h] Energy generated, gross [MWh] Time availability [%] Energy availability Energy utilisation [%] *) [%] *) Month Year Since Month Year Month Year Month Year commissioning KBR Brokdorf DWR 1480 1410 744 988 479 6 665 841 367 386 864 100.00 100.00 94.31 94.11 89.33 87.75 KKE Emsland DWR 1406 1335 744 1 025 986 6 284 415 363 884 616 100.00 89.40 100.00 89.28 98.07 87.44 KWG Grohnde DWR 1430 1360 744 995 246 5 472 514 393 747 360 100.00 90.87 98.98 90.59 92.93 74.40 KRB C Gundremmingen 1) SWR 1344 1288 494 618 401 5 293 448 346 617 000 66.36 78.85 62.62 77.19 61.35 76.47 KKI-2 Isar 1,2) DWR 1485 1410 240 332 429 6 466 222 372 228 691 32.27 90.14 31.41 90.01 29.91 84.78 GKN-II Neckarwestheim 1,2) DWR 1400 1310 373 508 100 6 054 800 346 293 044 50.13 87.42 48.87 87.21 48.87 84.71 News
Page 1 and 2:
nucmag.com 2020 10 ISSN · 1431-525
Page 3 and 4:
atw Vol. 65 (2020) | Issue 10 ı Oc
Page 5 and 6:
Kommunikation und Training für Ker
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12: atw Vol. 65 (2020) | Issue 10 ı Oc
Page 61: atw Vol. 65 (2020) | Issue 10 ı Oc
Page 67 and 68: Kommunikation und Training für Ker
show all

atw - International Journal for Nuclear Power | 10.2020

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?