23.12.2012 Views

Regulatory Committee Agenda - Waipa District Council

Regulatory Committee Agenda - Waipa District Council

Regulatory Committee Agenda - Waipa District Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• Heritage buildings should be conserved and history maintained along with<br />

architectural pleasure relating to Cambridge. Should not be throwing away<br />

another significant building for the sake of money.<br />

• Although building was altered over the years, its appearance is still a fine<br />

example of early local colonial architecture and has most of its original exterior<br />

features worth of preserving.<br />

• Built of hard timbers in 1877. It's perfectly sound and has a future life for a range<br />

of purposes. It has been rewired, re-plumbed ad re-piled.<br />

• RSA members voted to sell in 2003 based on the assurance that the 'historic<br />

significance of the building be maintained' (Waikato Times 10 Dec 2003) .<br />

Demolition of the building is not in keeping with that.<br />

• Demolishing the RSA goes against all principles of <strong>Waipa</strong> Heritage <strong>Council</strong> and is<br />

a major departure from WDC's heritage protection regulations/policy. Heritage<br />

buildings need to be protected and not destroyed.<br />

• Building has been given protection by WDC for its value as an early character<br />

structure of significance to the town and therefore needs to be preserved.<br />

• It is situated in the CBD 'character zone'- one of the few remaining examples of<br />

its type.<br />

• It is not up to NZHPT to determine whether heritage buildings in <strong>Waipa</strong> can go or<br />

not. It's the decision of the <strong>Waipa</strong> Community. NZHPT deal with national<br />

buildings.<br />

• Total demolition of the building with no attempt of any salvage would go down<br />

as a sad chapter in Cambridge's history.<br />

5.5 The key decisions/outcomes sought by the submitters include the following:<br />

• The building needs to be saved from demolition or removal.<br />

• <strong>Council</strong> have a duty to stand by our principles and uphold the protection of our<br />

heritage buildings.<br />

• Relocate the building within the CBD or nearby.<br />

• <strong>Council</strong> has to insist that it is offered for removal.<br />

• Building not to be removed from the site as building and site go hand in hand<br />

from historical point of view.<br />

• The assurances given to the RSA upon its sale should be respected .<br />

• If building is demolished, a plague be erected on site to acknowledge the early<br />

significance of the site.<br />

• No commercial housing or cafes to be built on the site- if building is removed.<br />

Report to <strong>Regulatory</strong> <strong>Committee</strong> Meeting- (19 November 2012)<br />

To demolish a Heritage Item- Cambridge RSA<br />

Page 7<br />

LU/0096/12<br />

181

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!