Regulatory Committee Agenda - Waipa District Council
Regulatory Committee Agenda - Waipa District Council
Regulatory Committee Agenda - Waipa District Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
190<br />
10 CONCLUSION<br />
10.1 The applicant is seeking consent from <strong>Council</strong> to demolish/remove an existing<br />
building from the site which is listed as a historic building in the Operative <strong>District</strong><br />
Plan and as a Heritage Item in the Proposed <strong>District</strong> Plan.<br />
10.2 To demolish a historic/heritage building is a Discretionary Activity in both the<br />
Operative and Proposed <strong>District</strong> Plans.<br />
10.3 After having considered the application in accordance with the matters required by<br />
Section 104, and based on the assessment undertaken by Alexy Simmons, I conclude<br />
that:<br />
• An assessment of the environmental effects of the proposal including concerns<br />
raised by the submitters have been considered in this report. The conclusion of<br />
that assessment is that the actual and potential adverse effects of allowing the<br />
activity can be adequately mitigated subject to appropriate conditions.<br />
Specifically, if the <strong>Committee</strong> was of the mind to approve the consent then<br />
conditions would need to be imposed that ensure the history of the building and<br />
site is recorded and kept for the public access.<br />
• The objectives and policies of both Operative and Proposed <strong>District</strong> Plan have<br />
been considered in this assessment. That assessment has concluded that the<br />
proposal is generally inconsistent with the objectives and policies of both plans<br />
which relates to the protection and preservation of historic/heritage buildings.<br />
However, based on the investigation undertaken by an expert professional (Alexy<br />
Simmons, Simmons and Associates Ltd) special circumstances are considered to<br />
apply to the building which supports the demolition.<br />
10.4 On the basis of the conclusions reached within Section 8.1 of this report I consider<br />
any potential effects associated with the proposal to be more than minor. I have<br />
however used my judgement and discretion provided by Section 104B to recommend<br />
that land use consent be granted subject to the recommended conditions, to avoid,<br />
remedy and/or mitigate the identified potential adverse effects, in section 11 of this<br />
report. The recommended conditions are based on the recommendations of the<br />
report prepared by Alexy Simmons, Simmons and Associates Ltd.<br />
Report to <strong>Regulatory</strong> <strong>Committee</strong> Mel!ting • ( 19 November 2012)<br />
To demolish a Herltase Item-Cambridse RSA<br />
Page 16<br />
LU/0096/12