Regulatory Committee Agenda - Waipa District Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

188 8.2.3 Proposed Waipa District Plan Objective - Protection of heritage items 22.3.1 To protect the District's heritage items from inappropriate subdivision, use and development. PoHcy- Providing protection for listed heritage items 22.3.1.1 To protect the heritage values associated with heritage items, (Appendix Nl) so that the national, regional or local significance of the item is retained. The basis of the significance of an item is wide ranging and can be its built features or the role that an item has played in the community over time. The categories that apply are: (c) Category C: Community Significance- Local significance heritage items are of local importance, contribute to the community's history and are noteworthy as community heritage places. Comment: The RSA building is listed as a Category C building. Removal of the building is not consistent with Polley 22.3.1.1. Objective - Maintaining and using heritage items 22.3.2 To protect the District's heritage items by ensuring that heritage items are retained within the District, appropriately maintained, and that any additions, alterations, or signs do not compromise the heritage values of the item. Policy -Demolition, partial demolition and removal of a heritage Item 22.3.2.7 The demolition or removal of a heritage item from its site shall be avoided unless in exceptional circumstances. Partial demolition, that is part of works to achieve an addition or alteration to a heritage item, shall be achieved in a manner that results in no more than minor adverse effect on the character and values of the heritage Item. Comment: In this instance it can be argued that there are exceptional circumstances which could support the removal of the building. These include the renovations and alterations to the building undertaken over the years and the financial requirement to restore the building to its original state. Report to Regulatory Committee Meeting· (19 November 2012) To demolish a Heritage Item-Cambridge RSA Page 14 LU/0096/12
8.2.4 Objectives and Polices Assessment Conclusion - Proposed District Plan I have considered all the relevant objectives and policies of the Proposed District Plan in light of the context of the District Plan and its explanations. The proposal is considered to be inconsistent with Policy 22.3.1.1 but consistent with policy 22.3.2. 7 due to special circumstances applicable to the building. 8.3 Weighting of District Plans The Proposed District Plan has been notified and is now closed for submissions. The rules relating to the protection of historic heritage have legal effect from 31 May 2012 and have therefore been considered in the assessment of the application. 9 PART 2 MATTERS 9.1 Part 2 is the purpose and principles of the RMA. The overall purpose of the RMA is to promote the sustainable management of natural and physical resources. "Sustainable management" is defined to mean 'managing the use, development and protection of such resources in a way that enables people and communities to provide for their social, economic and cultural well-being and their health and safety'. At the same time they must: • Sustain the potential of natural and physical resources to meet the reasonably foreseeable needs of the future generations; • Safeguard the life-supporting capacitY of air, water, soil and ecosystems; • Avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on the environment of the activity. 9.2 Section 6 requires consent authorities to recognise and provide for a number of matters of national importance in exercising powers and functions under the RMA. Of relevance to the current proposal is clause 6(f), which relates to the protection of historic heritage from inappropriate subdivision, use and development. Mitigation measures required for the application, i.e. recording of heritage values in order to retain a record, deemed the proposal to not be inconsistent with section 6. 9.3 The above Part 2 matters must be given effect to in policy, plan and rule making and when making decisions on resource consents. In this instance, the proposal is not considered to be consistent with all the objectives and policies of the Operative District Plan or Proposed District Plan, and although the potential effects (discussed in Section 8.1 of this report) of the proposal are deemed to be significant it is not considered to be inconsistent with the sustainable management principles of Part 2 of the Act. Report to Regulatory Committee Meeting - (19 November 2012) To demolish a Heritage Item- Cambridge RSA Page 15 LU/0096/12 189
Page 4:
LIJ Waipa DISTRICT COUNCIL Regulato
Page 7:
LLI Waipa DISTRICT COUNCIL Regulato
Page 10:
LIJ ""aipa DISTRICT COUNCIL Regulat
Page 14 and 15:
14 LIJ Waip a DISTRICT COUNCIL Regu
Page 16 and 17:
16 LLI Waipa DISTRICT COUNCIL Regul
Page 18:
18 Certificate AWAMUTU Renewal 016J
Page 23:
Planning Regulatory Report Landuse
Page 29:
TeAwamutu Decision Waste Storm AppN
Page 33:
TeAwamutu Decision Waste Storm AppN
Page 37:
KEY SLCA Special Landscape Characte
Page 41:
5 REPORT 5.1 Complaints 5.2 The tot
Page 44 and 45:
44 Staff responded to 20 nuisance c
Page 49 and 50:
LLI Waipa To: DISTRICT COUNCIL From
Page 51:
l Figure 3: Proposed District Plan,
Page 60:
60 On the basis that approximately
Page 64 and 65:
64 1.2 The property is adjacent to
Page 67 and 68:
{2) Repealed. (a) the holder of a s
Page 69:
consent authority considers relevan
Page 73 and 74:
7.3.4 Weighting of District Plans T
Page 76:
76 Appendix 1 Site location Map Rep
Page 80:
80 Appendix 3 SP/0106/11 Decision R
Page 83 and 84:
Where telephone cables serving any
Page 85 and 86:
i) All earthworks must be carried o
Page 87:
Appendix 4 Section 127 Application
Page 94:
94 1.2 The topography of the land i
Page 100 and 101:
100 There will be no adverse visual
Page 102 and 103:
102 plans, and future settlement pa
Page 104:
104 and subject to those costs whic
Page 109:
Appendix 2 SP/0113/12 Approved Subd
Page 114:
114 C4 That Lot 3 hereon be transfe
Page 117 and 118:
Schedule 2 Reasons for Decision Res
Page 120:
120 With our proposed new tubdivisi
Page 128:
128 waste water disposal system. Re
Page 132 and 133:
132
Page 134 and 135:
134 2. BACKGROUND 2.1 A previous ap
Page 137 and 138: 7.2 A copy of the application was f
Page 139 and 140: Rural Residential Density and Varie
Page 145 and 146: Objective- Giving effect to the Wai
Page 148 and 149: 148 defines the Waikato River as: "
Page 154 and 155: 154 Such Consent Notice must be eit
Page 156 and 157: 156 b) that all water supply pipeli
Page 159 and 160: Appendix 1 Amended Scheme Plan Repo
Page 162: 162
Page 169 and 170: Appendix 3 Consultation with Submit
Page 171 and 172: Tanya Running From: Sent: To: Phil
Page 173 and 174: condition) along their Northern bou
Page 176 and 177: 176 1 THE SITE 1.1 DESCRIPTION OF T
Page 178 and 179: 178 Figure 3: Zoning and Overlay- P
Page 180 and 181: 180 3 THE PROPOSAL 3.1 The proposal
Page 182 and 183: 182 5.6 The majority of the above i
Page 184 and 185: 184 7.2.3 The application was publi
Page 186: 186 8.1.5 It is acknowledged that t
Page 191 and 192: 11 RECOMMENDATION That a) The repor
Page 193 and 194: List of Appendices Appendix 1 Site
Page 219: Rgure 9 (top left}. Detail of the g
Page 227 and 228: archaeological sites dwi.ng earthwo
Page 230 and 231: 230 Appendix 4 Comments from Cambri
Page 233 and 234: From: John Bishop Sent: Wednesday,
Page 235: -------- AppendixS Assessment of th
Page 238 and 239:
238 reuse or relocated either withi
Page 241 and 242:
and educational value, and its pote
Page 249:
HN1rin1: - ------ - [] I do wish to
Page 264:
264 Appendix 7 Assessment undertake
Page 268 and 269:
268 • The objectives and polices
Page 270:
270 I MrsV 43 Burns Street, Not Ind
Page 274:
274 5.2 Waikato Campaien of the New
Page 277 and 278:
Club-house- "The contractor is gett
Page 279 and 280:
and serviceable. Frequently the fro
Page 282:
282 Figure 8 Floor boards 5 3/81nch
Page 285 and 286:
5.4.2.4 Ceiling Investigations Nort
Page 287:
5.4.3 Summary Cambridge Farmers Clu
Page 292 and 293:
292 Historical: "The extent to whic
Page 297:
12. Rarity: "The frequency with whi
show all

Regulatory Committee Agenda - Waipa District Council

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?