Regulatory Committee Agenda - Waipa District Council
Regulatory Committee Agenda - Waipa District Council
Regulatory Committee Agenda - Waipa District Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
238<br />
reuse or relocated either within the<br />
site or off site, in preference to<br />
demolition, to retain the significance<br />
of the building for future<br />
generations.<br />
(d) The extent to which any<br />
alteration to the building can be<br />
made that retains the heritage item.<br />
(e) The extent to which the materials<br />
of the item can be reused and<br />
incorporated into future buildings on<br />
the site.<br />
(f) The extent to which the item in its<br />
current state poses a significant<br />
safety risk.<br />
(g) The extent to which the heritage<br />
significance of the site, group or<br />
precinct to which the heritage<br />
feature relates Is compromised.<br />
(h) The extent to which the<br />
significance of the item to the<br />
community has been considered and<br />
the outcomes of any consultation<br />
undertaken.<br />
(I) The extent to which the effects of<br />
demolition can be mitigated by<br />
requiring the applicant to provide an<br />
accurate historical record of the<br />
building/structure.<br />
U) The extent to which there are<br />
extenuating drcumstances, such as<br />
the building presenting a danger to<br />
the public from being instable, or the<br />
cost of repair would be so great that<br />
it would exceed the lfkely value of<br />
the restored building.<br />
(k) If demolitJon or removal is<br />
approved, the Historic Building<br />
Documentation (HBD) should<br />
include: the structure's history,<br />
photocraphrc documentation and<br />
plans of the buildlne/structure as<br />
prepared by a slitably qualified<br />
person in refatlon to heritage. The<br />
documentation must be completed<br />
and accepted by the <strong>Council</strong> prior to<br />
and the extend of alterations<br />
undertaken over the years, it is<br />
my opinion that substantial<br />
financial Input would be<br />
require to restore the building.<br />
(d) Due to the scale of alterations<br />
it Is concluded in the report<br />
prepared by Alexy Simmons<br />
that the architectural features<br />
have been erased.<br />
(e) See (d)<br />
(f) It Is not believed the building<br />
poses a safety risk.<br />
(g) Removal of the building will<br />
not affect the integrity of the<br />
immediate area, but will leave<br />
a vacant site which previously<br />
had a historic connotation.<br />
(h) The application has been<br />
publidy notified and the<br />
comments from the submitters<br />
are noted.<br />
(i) A condition will be Imposed<br />
requiring that the applicant<br />
provide an historic remrd of<br />
the building and site.<br />
U) It is my opinion that the costs<br />
to restore the building to its<br />
former character would be high<br />
based on the fact that almost<br />
all the original features have<br />
been removed over the years.<br />
(k) A condition will be Imposed<br />
accordingly.
Change language