- Page 4:
LIJ Waipa DISTRICT COUNCIL Regulato
- Page 7:
LLI Waipa DISTRICT COUNCIL Regulato
- Page 10:
LIJ ""aipa DISTRICT COUNCIL Regulat
- Page 14 and 15:
14 LIJ Waip a DISTRICT COUNCIL Regu
- Page 16 and 17:
16 LLI Waipa DISTRICT COUNCIL Regul
- Page 18:
18 Certificate AWAMUTU Renewal 016J
- Page 23:
Planning Regulatory Report Landuse
- Page 29: TeAwamutu Decision Waste Storm AppN
- Page 33: TeAwamutu Decision Waste Storm AppN
- Page 37: KEY SLCA Special Landscape Characte
- Page 41: 5 REPORT 5.1 Complaints 5.2 The tot
- Page 44 and 45: 44 Staff responded to 20 nuisance c
- Page 49 and 50: LLI Waipa To: DISTRICT COUNCIL From
- Page 51: l Figure 3: Proposed District Plan,
- Page 60: 60 On the basis that approximately
- Page 64 and 65: 64 1.2 The property is adjacent to
- Page 67 and 68: {2) Repealed. (a) the holder of a s
- Page 69: consent authority considers relevan
- Page 73 and 74: 7.3.4 Weighting of District Plans T
- Page 78: 78 Appendix 2 SP/0106/11 Approved S
- Page 82 and 83: 82 Planning Conditions General Sche
- Page 84 and 85: 84 'holding' when the applicant has
- Page 86 and 87: 86 Schedule 2 Reasons for Decision
- Page 89: We seek that you grant us a variati
- Page 96: 96 2.4 The subdivision was granted
- Page 101 and 102: Objective SU3 To ensure that when l
- Page 103 and 104: Therefore it is considered the appl
- Page 106: 106 Terrena Kelly AUTHORISED OFFICE
- Page 111: Appendix 3 SP/0113/12 Decision Repo
- Page 116 and 117: 116 that the water supply to lot 2
- Page 118: 118 Appendix 4 Section 127 Applicat
- Page 127 and 128:
Reason: The applicants demonstrated
- Page 130:
130 (ii) The contractor must immedi
- Page 133 and 134:
I. ' To: From: Subject: Meeting Dat
- Page 135:
that any proposed dwelling would be
- Page 138 and 139:
138 passes through either of the se
- Page 140:
140 Assessment of Environmental Eff
- Page 146:
146 contrary. Where policies are ge
- Page 149:
participation of, and consultation
- Page 155 and 156:
• The internal access to Lot 1 be
- Page 157:
(iii) The consent holder must consu
- Page 160:
160
- Page 164:
164
- Page 170 and 171:
170
- Page 172 and 173:
172 To: Phil Cogswell Subject: RE:
- Page 174:
174
- Page 177 and 178:
Operative District Pion 1.1.4 The s
- Page 179 and 180:
library with west facing bay window
- Page 181 and 182:
• Heritage buildings should be co
- Page 183 and 184:
detailing the history of the buildi
- Page 185 and 186:
8 SECTION 104 ASSESSMENT A consent
- Page 188 and 189:
188 8.2.3 Proposed Waipa District P
- Page 190 and 191:
190 10 CONCLUSION 10.1 The applican
- Page 192 and 193:
192 plans must be provided with the
- Page 194:
194 Appendixl Site location Map
- Page 222:
222 Appendix 3 Authorisation from N
- Page 228:
22& 11. The Authority Holder must e
- Page 231:
From: Tony and Jennie fmailto:gford
- Page 234 and 235:
234 Ff'OM: Chris & Robin Astrtdge [
- Page 237 and 238:
can be avoided, remedied or mitigat
- Page 239:
uilding demolition/removal. 21.1.22
- Page 242:
242 Appendix 6 Submissions Received
- Page 261:
Name Heard - Oppose Addressl Hamish
- Page 267 and 268:
CAMBRIDGE (FORMER) RETURNED SERVICE
- Page 269 and 270:
3 SUBMISSIONS ON THE RESOURCE CONSE
- Page 273 and 274:
S.l Maori Land Use Before European
- Page 276 and 277:
276 Estate, Gwynn lands, Marshmeado
- Page 278 and 279:
278 "This building, which has been
- Page 280:
280 !wells addition 1881 CFC Lectur
- Page 284 and 285:
284 figure 9 Possible CFC room or s
- Page 286 and 287:
286 figure 11 Southeast corner of t
- Page 289:
surrounding landscape Into a notabl
- Page 293:
1942-2004 Cambridge Returned Servic
- Page 299:
Copies of the report information sh
Change language