23.12.2012 Views

Regulatory Committee Agenda - Waipa District Council

Regulatory Committee Agenda - Waipa District Council

Regulatory Committee Agenda - Waipa District Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12. Rarity: "The frequency with which the historic place can be found."<br />

There are no other Farmers' Clubs in <strong>Waipa</strong> <strong>District</strong> (Mercer 2009:32), albeit the CFC portion of<br />

the building has been subsumed into the RSA building.<br />

13. Integrity: "What is the integrity of the place?"<br />

Architectural integrity:<br />

Poor. The history of the building use has involved substantial modification to earlier building<br />

fabric. The newer work has compromised the architectural integritv of the structure. NZHPT<br />

determined the architectural compromises deemed the building not worthy of registration.<br />

The physical state or condition of the place:<br />

The building is in fair condition, but is not being used.<br />

To what extent is the place vulnerable to modification or destruction:<br />

Not known.<br />

7 SUMMARY<br />

Scheduling of the building in the district plan and the submissions received indicate there is<br />

community sentiment and interest in the building. Some of this sentiment is associated with<br />

the RSA building as a venue and an early historical place. Submitters suggested mitigation<br />

through retention of the building in the district or on the site. The buNding has been vacant for<br />

rnany years and the owner does not wish to continue to maintain an empty building on the<br />

land.<br />

The Historical Society suggested signage on the site as a method for mitigating affects if the<br />

building is removed from the site.<br />

The historical and architectural information documented in the previous sections illustrates<br />

how substantially the building fabric has been compromised by modifications over the years.<br />

The work, particularly during the 1950s through 1990s was required to make the building<br />

usable as an RSA venue.<br />

Major modifications to the building have erased the architectural features associations with the<br />

CfC (1877-1881) and Wells (1881-1936) phases of building use. for example the internal<br />

modifications have left virtually no spatial references to CFC use of the building. The sense of<br />

the place as a domestic structure associated with the Wells occupancy is also lost. Building<br />

33<br />

297

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!