Regulatory Committee Agenda - Waipa District Council
Regulatory Committee Agenda - Waipa District Council
Regulatory Committee Agenda - Waipa District Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
12. Rarity: "The frequency with which the historic place can be found."<br />
There are no other Farmers' Clubs in <strong>Waipa</strong> <strong>District</strong> (Mercer 2009:32), albeit the CFC portion of<br />
the building has been subsumed into the RSA building.<br />
13. Integrity: "What is the integrity of the place?"<br />
Architectural integrity:<br />
Poor. The history of the building use has involved substantial modification to earlier building<br />
fabric. The newer work has compromised the architectural integritv of the structure. NZHPT<br />
determined the architectural compromises deemed the building not worthy of registration.<br />
The physical state or condition of the place:<br />
The building is in fair condition, but is not being used.<br />
To what extent is the place vulnerable to modification or destruction:<br />
Not known.<br />
7 SUMMARY<br />
Scheduling of the building in the district plan and the submissions received indicate there is<br />
community sentiment and interest in the building. Some of this sentiment is associated with<br />
the RSA building as a venue and an early historical place. Submitters suggested mitigation<br />
through retention of the building in the district or on the site. The buNding has been vacant for<br />
rnany years and the owner does not wish to continue to maintain an empty building on the<br />
land.<br />
The Historical Society suggested signage on the site as a method for mitigating affects if the<br />
building is removed from the site.<br />
The historical and architectural information documented in the previous sections illustrates<br />
how substantially the building fabric has been compromised by modifications over the years.<br />
The work, particularly during the 1950s through 1990s was required to make the building<br />
usable as an RSA venue.<br />
Major modifications to the building have erased the architectural features associations with the<br />
CfC (1877-1881) and Wells (1881-1936) phases of building use. for example the internal<br />
modifications have left virtually no spatial references to CFC use of the building. The sense of<br />
the place as a domestic structure associated with the Wells occupancy is also lost. Building<br />
33<br />
297